Cui Bono?
- Alex Jacob
- Posts: 1671
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 2:10 am
- Location: Meta-Rabbit Hole
Re: Cui Bono?
The unexamined material is a projection onto 'Jews' a power that they don't have. What is not examined is the underpinning, psychological 'reasoning' that allows such an outrageous assertion to be expressed. Maybe you-all believe that 'the Jews' totally control 'the media' and that they have a sort of stranglehold on the mind of humanity and literally dictate how the world is seen and interpreted, and have so much power that they are manipulating the most giant military and economic force ever to arise on the planet so that it does the will of Israel (or 'the Jews')...
This is more or less the story line, Trevor. This is a common idea and many people seem to have it. Just by dropping some of these terms into Google you'd get thousands of different pages that say essentially the same thing. And people seem to drink it up. What does that say, Trevor?
AJ: "...actually refers to a mythic force, a mysterious potency, a metaphysical idea with links to a Machiavellian-demonic-Earth power with inconceivable potency, and is opposed by other 'angelic' ideas and ideals..."
Leyla: "Don't be silly! Clearly, that's a description of the Muslims."
But the stereotypical notion about the Muslims is so much more simple, and so much more realistic. For a certain number of centuries there has been a struggle between one power center and another, both attempting to dominate the other. The fact is that the West does not ascribe to the Muslims anything approaching mythical potency, and the story line seems to run that with enough pressure, these Muslim nations can be forced into the fold of the West and become integrated into the world system, which is really the essence of the Chomskian view. In respect to the religion and philosophy of the Muslims, it has been universally ridiculed in the West, speaking generally. I have an Oxford edition of the Koran and the prologue is embarrassingly short, and the author more or less outrightly dismisses the book as being incomparable to the Bible, for example.
But to refer to Muslims as having a single-minded desire to do harm to the West out of jealousy and rage, now that is a story that is certainly told (lied about, presented in propaganda).
This is more or less the story line, Trevor. This is a common idea and many people seem to have it. Just by dropping some of these terms into Google you'd get thousands of different pages that say essentially the same thing. And people seem to drink it up. What does that say, Trevor?
AJ: "...actually refers to a mythic force, a mysterious potency, a metaphysical idea with links to a Machiavellian-demonic-Earth power with inconceivable potency, and is opposed by other 'angelic' ideas and ideals..."
Leyla: "Don't be silly! Clearly, that's a description of the Muslims."
But the stereotypical notion about the Muslims is so much more simple, and so much more realistic. For a certain number of centuries there has been a struggle between one power center and another, both attempting to dominate the other. The fact is that the West does not ascribe to the Muslims anything approaching mythical potency, and the story line seems to run that with enough pressure, these Muslim nations can be forced into the fold of the West and become integrated into the world system, which is really the essence of the Chomskian view. In respect to the religion and philosophy of the Muslims, it has been universally ridiculed in the West, speaking generally. I have an Oxford edition of the Koran and the prologue is embarrassingly short, and the author more or less outrightly dismisses the book as being incomparable to the Bible, for example.
But to refer to Muslims as having a single-minded desire to do harm to the West out of jealousy and rage, now that is a story that is certainly told (lied about, presented in propaganda).
Ni ange, ni bête
- Trevor Salyzyn
- Posts: 2420
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:52 pm
- Location: Canada
Re: Cui Bono?
Okay, then let us turn to daybrown.Alex Jacob wrote:What is not examined is the underpinning, psychological 'reasoning' that allows such an outrageous assertion to be expressed.
Daybrown, are you aware of any psychological reasons that may accompany or underpin your assertions about Judaism? If not, might there exist such? Or alternatively: if you are conscious of such, have you examined them?
- Alex Jacob
- Posts: 1671
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 2:10 am
- Location: Meta-Rabbit Hole
Re: Cui Bono?
You've been upstaged by a 68-year old geezer from Arkansas. Ain't philosophy a bitch.Alex Jacob wrote:Daybrown?
Good Citizen Carl
Re: Cui Bono?
.
The "geezer" is aged-69 and originally from Minnesota...
Tomas
.
Carl G wrote:You've been upstaged by a 68-year old geezer from Arkansas. Ain't philosophy a bitch.Alex Jacob wrote:Daybrown?
The "geezer" is aged-69 and originally from Minnesota...
Tomas
.
- Trevor Salyzyn
- Posts: 2420
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:52 pm
- Location: Canada
Re: Cui Bono?
Hey, I'm not trying to let him upstage anyone. I'd just like to give him an opportunity to defend himself.
I mean, notwithstanding my bias against Jews runs pretty deep. My grandmother is a bitch, and tried to take away my university funding (back when I cared about university) because I decided to skip Jewish New Years one year. Another of my relatives, second cousins from South Africa, were not allowed to play with me when I was little because only my mom is "Jewish" (even though my father, a Catholic from Ukraine, obeys Jewish law with a lot more tenacity). It's seemingly trivial actions like that -- when exercised by a large group of people -- that create conspiracies. Racism, pressure to conform, and large quantities of wealth controlled by gossipy old women with nothing to do with their time.
Also, Fiddler on the Roof sucked. If that's the pinnacle of Jewish culture, I don't want any. The nadir of my life is when I couldn't get "yaddle deedle daddle dum" out of my head.
I mean, notwithstanding my bias against Jews runs pretty deep. My grandmother is a bitch, and tried to take away my university funding (back when I cared about university) because I decided to skip Jewish New Years one year. Another of my relatives, second cousins from South Africa, were not allowed to play with me when I was little because only my mom is "Jewish" (even though my father, a Catholic from Ukraine, obeys Jewish law with a lot more tenacity). It's seemingly trivial actions like that -- when exercised by a large group of people -- that create conspiracies. Racism, pressure to conform, and large quantities of wealth controlled by gossipy old women with nothing to do with their time.
Also, Fiddler on the Roof sucked. If that's the pinnacle of Jewish culture, I don't want any. The nadir of my life is when I couldn't get "yaddle deedle daddle dum" out of my head.
- Alex Jacob
- Posts: 1671
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 2:10 am
- Location: Meta-Rabbit Hole
Re: Cui Bono?
Never, ever trust a philosopher, of any stripe. That is the first rule of philosophy. Or as Tata used to say, 'Better a hometown thief than an out-of-town rabbi'. (Ashkenazi wisdom there, folks, the sort that won the Sild Road).
;-)
And here is the pinnacle of Jewish culture:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fA8OmK3q ... ed&search=
;-)
And here is the pinnacle of Jewish culture:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fA8OmK3q ... ed&search=
Ni ange, ni bête
- Trevor Salyzyn
- Posts: 2420
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:52 pm
- Location: Canada
Re: Cui Bono?
AJ,
Also: if it wasn't for the contortions of her face, Streissand would be a head-turner.
I'd say the second rule, then, would be "you have a stripe, so don't trust yourself either."Never, ever trust a philosopher, of any stripe. That is the first rule of philosophy.
Also: if it wasn't for the contortions of her face, Streissand would be a head-turner.
Re: Cui Bono?
Oh, of course. Nobody denies that the Japs killed 12 million, or that the Commies in Russia and China each killed several times that many. Why else would people doubt that the Nazis killed a mere 6 million Jews?Daybrown, are you aware of any psychological reasons that may accompany or underpin your assertions about Judaism? If not, might there exist such? Or alternatively: if you are conscious of such, have you examined them?
But of all these groups, it is the Jews who've had such a powerful narrative in the Old Testament. As political propaganda, originally crafted to unite the Jews to face the threat of Persian invasion, it is a masterwork. As, I mite note, Homer's Illiad, created to unite the Greeks for the same purpose.
But if you add up all the Greek & Levantine documents ever found, it'd all fit in a broom closet. The people who were *really* literate were running the Silk Road. http://www.silk-road.com/newsletter/vol ... _bloom.php makes mention of a mail bag found in the Kara Kum desert. From 331 AD. With letters written on *paper*. Which we didnt even know existed back then. The website also mentions a collaborative effort between the Brits & Chinese to put the entire canon of their collection, 100,000 jpgs of artifacts and documents online. 100 years ago, British, French, & German expeditions to the Kara Kum and Taklamakhan deserts brought back *truckloads* of documents dating from even before Christ written in 20 different languages- Persian, Sogdian, Tocharian, Chinese, Sanskrit, etc.
Much of all this was written by the ancestors of the people we know as the Ashkenazic Jews. They have been in business and political negotiations for millennia, and they are damn good at it. They created translations among these languages of the Vedic, Buddhist, Taoist, Confucian, Manichean, Zoroastrian, and other religious sacred texts. These people are the Magi.
They are not stupid enuf to try to form a monolithic conspiracy to control the planet. Their own letters show that they are merely in business and trying to cope with a world full of dysfunctional fools. And now, they have brought that management skill to Wall Street and the Corporate media. From the put calls on American Airlines (reported by Swiss financial analysts) and other important stocks, we know that *some* on Wall Street knew what was coming down, and at the top of that list is Silverstein who had the lease on the WTC complex insured up to the hilt. Had he owned merely a chain of delis that all went up in smoke, the investigators would have been all over his ass. But the scope of this plot surpasses all others in history, which made it seem impossible.
Its not that the Jews control the media so much as their skill at manipulating it, aware of how emotional the masses are, sets the group think of the editorial boards. And in the case of 911, they all understood how this created really juicy media that got them terrific ratings and thus ad revenues, for effects that they did not have to pay for. The fact that it also led to the Mid-East wars was gravy, would have been destroyed by actually unraveling the plot. By not doing so, they got lots more video of shit blowing up - like a war movie, that again, they did not have to pay for.
I have argued that this was a short sighted view, and we now run a serious risk of a run on the dollar because of these costs, which were not borne by the media operations which profited by them, but the American Taxpayers and their credit. Which we see is maxed.
The Magi and their descendants are smart, but they were not prophets. Had they looked far enuf ahead, they would have seen the risk in the narrative of the Koran, and united to meet that threat. The other thing you notice when you look at the Silk Road documents, is how most of it was written in a feminine hand. Part of their problem was that increased travel was spreading STDs which was killing the women in the brothels. So- if the men were not going to be laid, then it made more sense for them to listen to Mohammed, who promised them 12 year old virgins in heaven.
Goddess made sex for company.
- Trevor Salyzyn
- Posts: 2420
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:52 pm
- Location: Canada
Re: Cui Bono?
daybrown: since you've covered historical roots and modern ethical problems with this control, how do you predict this situation will continue?
Re: Cui Bono?
A bimodal, two humped camel curve seems the best bet. We are not going back to the stone age; there's too much metal left laying around. Neither is the globe headed for universal prosperity; the chaos in the more masochistic, high birth rate impoverished areas will prolly get worse as oil becomes costly.
Some empires, like the Chinese, repeatedly collapsed rapidly and catastrophically down to warlordism, with things run by the tribal goon squads as outlined by LeBlanc in "Constant Battles". Other empires, like the Byzantine, gradually kept shedding provinces to barbarism for centuries with life going on in Constantinople pretty much like it always had right down to the point where the empire ended at the city walls.
The global financial market is basically free, with no single power having that much control over it. There's a good case to be made that the value of the dollar can fall in a controlled fashion to bring the trade back in balance with US production. The abandonment of some of the more unstable and impoverished cultures to barbarism will free up oil and other critical resources to be directed to the developed economies, letting millions of poor people die of disease, starvation, and violence while the powers that be work out how to get a better handle on how to control the situation.
But since it is a free market, it could collapse in panic at any time, even tho that would not be wise. Markets are not always rational, which is why they speak of "market sentiment". But maybe psychology and sociology will get a better handle on the group think that sets off crisis and "unwarranted exhuberance".
While the discussions here are carried on in a reasonable fashion, we all know the net is full of insane rants, ad hominum, and psychological denial, and that many of the postings are not rational discourse, but simply partisans talking past each other trying to score points rather than looking for common ground. The question is whether the power elites are just as irrational. I dont see any way that we can determine how wise, or foolish, they are. The global corporate culture also suffers from group think.
In many ways the global situation looks like some kind of "sim city", with fundamentals in the software to maximize the variation of some variables in order to make the game more challenging & interesting. If you track the history and prehistory from the Jade Gate west to the Atlantic at 40-45 deg N. Lat, going all the way back to the Neanderthal, it looks like a pot boiler crafted to pander to the sensibilities of Aryan supremacists- but for the largely hidden power of women in that evolution.
How do we evaluate the effect of the Hand Of Fate? In many ways, the struggle we see going on now looks a lot like the Bagavad Gita, in which Arjuna is told of the mighty forces gathering, but then told it is all an illusion. A 3D video game. Arjuna is also told that some of what he sees are divinely created and animated forms which exist only to challenge the fulfillment of his Kharma. But the Gita dont say why he has to try to fullfill it.
The Gita calls these forms "avatars". And like the figures in a video game, they are programmed to act as they do. You can learn from an avatar, but you cannot teach one anything. You are the only sentient being with free will. The rest of us are all avatars. I have not been scripted to say how this will all unfold. I can see that no matter which hump the future comes to rest on, either that with continued economic and technological development, or that which has a massive die off, that there are certain places on the stage of history where life can still be lived well, that will be on top of one hump, or the other.
Some avatars in the game you must defeat, others offer clues. http://www.paulekman.com offers a CD you can use to learn to read faces that are trying to deceive you. "Never Be Lied To Again" by Lieberman is cheaper, and just as useful, instructive in how to read body language and the way people think. The insights these resources offer may save your life in a crisis, or if not, save your career.
You mite also, as I have, go to your county health service and get tested for STDs. The documentation will prove you are responsible to any potential sex partners now, but go a long ways twards proving you would be an asset to any community you wished to join later.
My point is, that you do not have to decide which way it will all unfold; there are things you can do what will prove valuable either way. The ancient sages had a high regard for altered states of consciousness. If you find meditation does not work for you, you could still order Amanita Muscaria online, slather a gram of the dried shroom with butter for every 25 lb of body weight, and have an enlightening experience. I must say, however, that these entheogenic potions have a habit of destroying neurotic delusions, which have, in turn, destroyed Christian faith, dysfunctional marriages, and made people realize it was time for a career change. Academics, with so much invested in a career, have understandably taken a dim view. But if you learn to meditate like a Zen master, it has all of the same results.
But- another result beaks you out of group think and lets you see unfolding events with greater levels of understanding. Ergo, if crisis emerges, you'll see it sooner. Share Soma (A. Muscaria) some nite, and you will know who you can trust. The altered state of consciousness prevents liars from keeping their stories straight.
Some empires, like the Chinese, repeatedly collapsed rapidly and catastrophically down to warlordism, with things run by the tribal goon squads as outlined by LeBlanc in "Constant Battles". Other empires, like the Byzantine, gradually kept shedding provinces to barbarism for centuries with life going on in Constantinople pretty much like it always had right down to the point where the empire ended at the city walls.
The global financial market is basically free, with no single power having that much control over it. There's a good case to be made that the value of the dollar can fall in a controlled fashion to bring the trade back in balance with US production. The abandonment of some of the more unstable and impoverished cultures to barbarism will free up oil and other critical resources to be directed to the developed economies, letting millions of poor people die of disease, starvation, and violence while the powers that be work out how to get a better handle on how to control the situation.
But since it is a free market, it could collapse in panic at any time, even tho that would not be wise. Markets are not always rational, which is why they speak of "market sentiment". But maybe psychology and sociology will get a better handle on the group think that sets off crisis and "unwarranted exhuberance".
While the discussions here are carried on in a reasonable fashion, we all know the net is full of insane rants, ad hominum, and psychological denial, and that many of the postings are not rational discourse, but simply partisans talking past each other trying to score points rather than looking for common ground. The question is whether the power elites are just as irrational. I dont see any way that we can determine how wise, or foolish, they are. The global corporate culture also suffers from group think.
In many ways the global situation looks like some kind of "sim city", with fundamentals in the software to maximize the variation of some variables in order to make the game more challenging & interesting. If you track the history and prehistory from the Jade Gate west to the Atlantic at 40-45 deg N. Lat, going all the way back to the Neanderthal, it looks like a pot boiler crafted to pander to the sensibilities of Aryan supremacists- but for the largely hidden power of women in that evolution.
How do we evaluate the effect of the Hand Of Fate? In many ways, the struggle we see going on now looks a lot like the Bagavad Gita, in which Arjuna is told of the mighty forces gathering, but then told it is all an illusion. A 3D video game. Arjuna is also told that some of what he sees are divinely created and animated forms which exist only to challenge the fulfillment of his Kharma. But the Gita dont say why he has to try to fullfill it.
The Gita calls these forms "avatars". And like the figures in a video game, they are programmed to act as they do. You can learn from an avatar, but you cannot teach one anything. You are the only sentient being with free will. The rest of us are all avatars. I have not been scripted to say how this will all unfold. I can see that no matter which hump the future comes to rest on, either that with continued economic and technological development, or that which has a massive die off, that there are certain places on the stage of history where life can still be lived well, that will be on top of one hump, or the other.
Some avatars in the game you must defeat, others offer clues. http://www.paulekman.com offers a CD you can use to learn to read faces that are trying to deceive you. "Never Be Lied To Again" by Lieberman is cheaper, and just as useful, instructive in how to read body language and the way people think. The insights these resources offer may save your life in a crisis, or if not, save your career.
You mite also, as I have, go to your county health service and get tested for STDs. The documentation will prove you are responsible to any potential sex partners now, but go a long ways twards proving you would be an asset to any community you wished to join later.
My point is, that you do not have to decide which way it will all unfold; there are things you can do what will prove valuable either way. The ancient sages had a high regard for altered states of consciousness. If you find meditation does not work for you, you could still order Amanita Muscaria online, slather a gram of the dried shroom with butter for every 25 lb of body weight, and have an enlightening experience. I must say, however, that these entheogenic potions have a habit of destroying neurotic delusions, which have, in turn, destroyed Christian faith, dysfunctional marriages, and made people realize it was time for a career change. Academics, with so much invested in a career, have understandably taken a dim view. But if you learn to meditate like a Zen master, it has all of the same results.
But- another result beaks you out of group think and lets you see unfolding events with greater levels of understanding. Ergo, if crisis emerges, you'll see it sooner. Share Soma (A. Muscaria) some nite, and you will know who you can trust. The altered state of consciousness prevents liars from keeping their stories straight.
Goddess made sex for company.
-
Steven Coyle
Re: Cui Bono?
daybrown,
Wondering if you're familiar with Timothy Leary's Eight Circuit Consciousness Model...
Wondering if you're familiar with Timothy Leary's Eight Circuit Consciousness Model...
Re: Cui Bono?
I always thot Leary was a media hack, so unlike all the acid heads I knew and tripped with. i have not read anything he had to say in decades, and dont recall ever reading much at the time. Writing about using acid is like trying to teach virgins about sex without ever actually having any. I dunno; if they paid me that much, I mita made an ass of myself too.
I never actually knew the man, and as with 911, know damn well that media does not reliably report, and spoze if there were selected video of me, I too could look like a fool. That Eight circuit sounds like Buddha's Eight Fold Path; both are sound bytes. Having read and experienced more widely since, I know reports are sometime attributed to a famous master in order to give them some authority beyond whatever wisdom may be apparent in the presentation itself.
Many of us change over time as well; In "the Birth of Tragedy", the first chapter is labled "A critical backward glance", in which Nietzsche ponders what has been made of his work, and tries to clarify what he came to think were misunderstandings, or present new insights he had since. I dont recall that Leary ever got beyond the point that made him famous. But Nietsche:
"Once again: as I look at it today my treatise strikes me as quite impossible. It is poorly written, heavy-handed, embarassing. the imagery is both frantic and confused. In spots it is saccharine to the point of effeminancy; the tempo is erratic; it lacks logical nicety and is so sure of its message that it dispenses with any kind of proof. Worse than that, it suspects the very notion of proof, being a book written for initiates, a "music" for men christened in the name of musicand held togehter by special esthetic experiences, a shibboleth for the highbrow confraternity. ..." harder on himself than anyone.
He goes on in the book wondering about Greek Theater, how the plots stand in stark contrast to the morality tales of the Bible. There is something in Greek art, in the scupture of Phidias, Homer, drama, etc that "deifies the good and the bad indifferently." And then he goes on- "And the beholder may find himself dismayed in the presence of such overflowing life and ask himself what potion these heady people must have drunk in order to behold, in whatever direction they looked, Helen laughing back at them, the beguiling image of their own existance."
Well, ethnobotanist RG Wasson, "The Road to Eleusis" tells us the potion is Kykeion. Justinian had the Great Telesterion hall at Eleusis pounded into rubble, which buried the mystery of Eleusis. But you know how archaeologists reconstruct pots from hundreds of shards. Well they went there, and reassembled the rubble. The reconstructed Ba-reliefs show Demeter and Dionysos with sheaves of barley. However, Wasson, being a botanist, knows there's a problem with the barley, and sends the photos to Hoffman at Sandoz labs, who gets back with him and tells him that yes, the barley is infected with Claviceps Purpurea. aka 'ergot'.
Hoffman goes on to say that ergot grown on barley does not have strychnine like on wheat or rye, but only *lysergic acids*. Wasson goes on to show that the famous Eleusinian Mysteries' secret was that Kykeion was basically LSD. The Greeks were acid heads. Which is why there was that artistic explosion, just as there was in America when acid hit the streets. Nietzsche knew they were getting off on something.
Now, I dunno if you are old enuf to remember, or looked it up, but Hoffman had been under contract with the "intelligence community" looking for a 'truth serum' when he found LSD. And the initial reports are that every soldier and agent they gave LSD to soon selected another career. He gave them more truth than they could handle. Sometimes acid does that, some people cant handle the truth of having their delusions demolished, and flip out. (altho they soon get over it, but are no longer Christians)
So, I doubt whether you will find an acid head who believes the official 911 report. LSD has a nasty habit of exposing the cognitive dissonance in group think, and it dont matter how big the group is, even if it is an entire nation. I dont think Leary would have bought into it either had he lived to see 911.
I never actually knew the man, and as with 911, know damn well that media does not reliably report, and spoze if there were selected video of me, I too could look like a fool. That Eight circuit sounds like Buddha's Eight Fold Path; both are sound bytes. Having read and experienced more widely since, I know reports are sometime attributed to a famous master in order to give them some authority beyond whatever wisdom may be apparent in the presentation itself.
Many of us change over time as well; In "the Birth of Tragedy", the first chapter is labled "A critical backward glance", in which Nietzsche ponders what has been made of his work, and tries to clarify what he came to think were misunderstandings, or present new insights he had since. I dont recall that Leary ever got beyond the point that made him famous. But Nietsche:
"Once again: as I look at it today my treatise strikes me as quite impossible. It is poorly written, heavy-handed, embarassing. the imagery is both frantic and confused. In spots it is saccharine to the point of effeminancy; the tempo is erratic; it lacks logical nicety and is so sure of its message that it dispenses with any kind of proof. Worse than that, it suspects the very notion of proof, being a book written for initiates, a "music" for men christened in the name of musicand held togehter by special esthetic experiences, a shibboleth for the highbrow confraternity. ..." harder on himself than anyone.
He goes on in the book wondering about Greek Theater, how the plots stand in stark contrast to the morality tales of the Bible. There is something in Greek art, in the scupture of Phidias, Homer, drama, etc that "deifies the good and the bad indifferently." And then he goes on- "And the beholder may find himself dismayed in the presence of such overflowing life and ask himself what potion these heady people must have drunk in order to behold, in whatever direction they looked, Helen laughing back at them, the beguiling image of their own existance."
Well, ethnobotanist RG Wasson, "The Road to Eleusis" tells us the potion is Kykeion. Justinian had the Great Telesterion hall at Eleusis pounded into rubble, which buried the mystery of Eleusis. But you know how archaeologists reconstruct pots from hundreds of shards. Well they went there, and reassembled the rubble. The reconstructed Ba-reliefs show Demeter and Dionysos with sheaves of barley. However, Wasson, being a botanist, knows there's a problem with the barley, and sends the photos to Hoffman at Sandoz labs, who gets back with him and tells him that yes, the barley is infected with Claviceps Purpurea. aka 'ergot'.
Hoffman goes on to say that ergot grown on barley does not have strychnine like on wheat or rye, but only *lysergic acids*. Wasson goes on to show that the famous Eleusinian Mysteries' secret was that Kykeion was basically LSD. The Greeks were acid heads. Which is why there was that artistic explosion, just as there was in America when acid hit the streets. Nietzsche knew they were getting off on something.
Now, I dunno if you are old enuf to remember, or looked it up, but Hoffman had been under contract with the "intelligence community" looking for a 'truth serum' when he found LSD. And the initial reports are that every soldier and agent they gave LSD to soon selected another career. He gave them more truth than they could handle. Sometimes acid does that, some people cant handle the truth of having their delusions demolished, and flip out. (altho they soon get over it, but are no longer Christians)
So, I doubt whether you will find an acid head who believes the official 911 report. LSD has a nasty habit of exposing the cognitive dissonance in group think, and it dont matter how big the group is, even if it is an entire nation. I dont think Leary would have bought into it either had he lived to see 911.
Goddess made sex for company.
- Alex Jacob
- Posts: 1671
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 2:10 am
- Location: Meta-Rabbit Hole
Re: Cui Bono?
But if anything, it seems to me, the psychedelic experience leads not to a pure Greek or Nietzschean tragic viewpoint (an acceptance of life in its profusion and with all its conflicts, an embracing of that profusion, and participation in that profusion) but to the sort of Platonism that Nietzsche took a stance against, an Apollonian viewpoint, a meddlesomeness in the ways of life a retreat form life.
The tragic ethic, or this Greek ethic, seems quite the opposite of these neo-platonisms, these elaborate metaphysics that the psychedelic experience seems to inculcate.
Although I am a believer in the value of the ceremonial use of psychedelics, nevertheless I have also noted that their use tends to create a sort of abstraction in those who use them, and this concerns me, and is something I have had to 'battle' against in my own self.
OTOH, to apply the Dionysian label to the psychedelic experience seems more apt than to label it Apollonian, insofar as the psychedelic tends to completely take over consciousness and puts your own ego well to the side, at least temporarily. You are spoken to and do not necessarily get to speak.
And also, isn't it odd that the Mazateca Indians who use the mushroom ritually, equate the mushroom itself with Jesus Christ? That during his agony he coursed over the Earth and where his saliva fell to the ground the mushroom sprung up? The Eucharist from another angle. Many people I have known who have spent time in south central Mexico with Mazateca mushroom curanderos have reported mega-visions that have to do with the 'Christian mysteries' (this comment because you seem to imply that the LSD experience would 'cure' one of one's Christianity, whereas in some senses it seems to explain it). A friend of mine told me that some Peruvians who were members of the guerrilla group 'Sendero Luminoso' wound up at the house of his curandero and ate mushrooms. The visions they had dealt with all the people they had killed for no good reason, all the misery and suffering they had created, and an absolute moral authority who 'told' them in no uncertain terms that the gig was up, that they had to radically change directions on the paths of life, and the mushroom spirit showed them in visionary form what new roads to take and how they could make amends. The mushroom took them on a hell-journey for the whole night and when dawn finally came, they were found crying like babies and begging God to forgive them. You have to admit the effect of this sort of visionary experience is contrary to the typical tragic interpretation...
Or was their experience just their old Catholic programming that needed 'to be overcome' by the Ubermench?
And what would George Bush and Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney 'see' if they allowed themselves to come before mighty teonanacatl for an all night psychedelic vigil? Who would be left to secure all that lovely petroleum for us? Better they stay with their gin-and-tonics...
Most people I know tend to describe a psychedelic experience that open up into an understanding of life beyond the merely physical, that is to say to higher metaphysics, similar in sort to that revealed in the Bhagavad-Gita, and I would think of that sort of utterly outrageous Hindu visionary-ism, with descriptions of world upon worlds, spheres of consciousness upon spheres of consciousness, as being far more psychedelic than the general vision of the Greeks in their tragic phase.
Although as you say the psychedelic experience tends to produce an experience that demonstrates to one that in so many ways life is a screen onto which is projected a sort of theatre, with 'avataras' charging about, demonic as well as divine entities, and that we participate in this drama in all our different ways, it also seems to happen that some 'acid heads' tend to get quite absorbed in their own representations of drama, the tableau of experience, and oddly to lose sight of life. It has certainly happened. Sometimes their visions become insipid.
The powers and potencies that run the world, and that supposedly engineered this astounding event known as 9/11, have exclusively material goals in mind, and to use a Castanedian language, they are only concerned for dominating the 'tonal', the known, the real estate of the world. None of this has to be metaphysicalized, none of this has to be seen through lenses of demons and angels, except insofar as the desire or need to control the 'tonal', to control matter, is an endeavor that life itself is acutely involved in. Life itself is the ultimate materialistic, power-hungry and power-mad entity that dominates the world as we know it, and to soak up all the sun's radiance that it can.
To propose other dimensions, other possibilities in the use and purpose and ends of consciousness is oddly 'anti-tragical', don't you think?
And if the psychedelic experience in soldiers tends to make them 'change careers', it does so because it renders on less likely to want to participate int he bustle of life and certainly in the carnage of war and conquest, so this tends to go in contra of part of what you are presenting. So where a dose of Greek Nietzschianism leads to an extention of the American Century into the present one and the engineering of 9/11 and whater other event is required to maintain a certain direction, a dose of Plant Teachers leads one...to pine for the higher planets...or at least for the sacred woods and rivers and fields of nature that are rapidly disappearing.
A funny anecdote: I know a fair number of Hindus, they are an unusual and sometimes comic bunch. But one fellow was telling me once that the Brahmins, those with access to certain knowledge, use special mantras to direct their next incarnation to 'higher planets'...and they have slowly been leaving the earth...and the way this fellow described it reminded me of someone unhappy with 'what was happening to the neighborhood' who decided to secure better real estate on the other side of town, away from all the riff-raff...
Is that what you mean when you say, 'Time to get out of Dodge'?
;-)
http://www.archive.org/details/mazatecmushroom
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R._Gordon_Wasson
The tragic ethic, or this Greek ethic, seems quite the opposite of these neo-platonisms, these elaborate metaphysics that the psychedelic experience seems to inculcate.
Although I am a believer in the value of the ceremonial use of psychedelics, nevertheless I have also noted that their use tends to create a sort of abstraction in those who use them, and this concerns me, and is something I have had to 'battle' against in my own self.
OTOH, to apply the Dionysian label to the psychedelic experience seems more apt than to label it Apollonian, insofar as the psychedelic tends to completely take over consciousness and puts your own ego well to the side, at least temporarily. You are spoken to and do not necessarily get to speak.
And also, isn't it odd that the Mazateca Indians who use the mushroom ritually, equate the mushroom itself with Jesus Christ? That during his agony he coursed over the Earth and where his saliva fell to the ground the mushroom sprung up? The Eucharist from another angle. Many people I have known who have spent time in south central Mexico with Mazateca mushroom curanderos have reported mega-visions that have to do with the 'Christian mysteries' (this comment because you seem to imply that the LSD experience would 'cure' one of one's Christianity, whereas in some senses it seems to explain it). A friend of mine told me that some Peruvians who were members of the guerrilla group 'Sendero Luminoso' wound up at the house of his curandero and ate mushrooms. The visions they had dealt with all the people they had killed for no good reason, all the misery and suffering they had created, and an absolute moral authority who 'told' them in no uncertain terms that the gig was up, that they had to radically change directions on the paths of life, and the mushroom spirit showed them in visionary form what new roads to take and how they could make amends. The mushroom took them on a hell-journey for the whole night and when dawn finally came, they were found crying like babies and begging God to forgive them. You have to admit the effect of this sort of visionary experience is contrary to the typical tragic interpretation...
Or was their experience just their old Catholic programming that needed 'to be overcome' by the Ubermench?
And what would George Bush and Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney 'see' if they allowed themselves to come before mighty teonanacatl for an all night psychedelic vigil? Who would be left to secure all that lovely petroleum for us? Better they stay with their gin-and-tonics...
Most people I know tend to describe a psychedelic experience that open up into an understanding of life beyond the merely physical, that is to say to higher metaphysics, similar in sort to that revealed in the Bhagavad-Gita, and I would think of that sort of utterly outrageous Hindu visionary-ism, with descriptions of world upon worlds, spheres of consciousness upon spheres of consciousness, as being far more psychedelic than the general vision of the Greeks in their tragic phase.
Although as you say the psychedelic experience tends to produce an experience that demonstrates to one that in so many ways life is a screen onto which is projected a sort of theatre, with 'avataras' charging about, demonic as well as divine entities, and that we participate in this drama in all our different ways, it also seems to happen that some 'acid heads' tend to get quite absorbed in their own representations of drama, the tableau of experience, and oddly to lose sight of life. It has certainly happened. Sometimes their visions become insipid.
The powers and potencies that run the world, and that supposedly engineered this astounding event known as 9/11, have exclusively material goals in mind, and to use a Castanedian language, they are only concerned for dominating the 'tonal', the known, the real estate of the world. None of this has to be metaphysicalized, none of this has to be seen through lenses of demons and angels, except insofar as the desire or need to control the 'tonal', to control matter, is an endeavor that life itself is acutely involved in. Life itself is the ultimate materialistic, power-hungry and power-mad entity that dominates the world as we know it, and to soak up all the sun's radiance that it can.
To propose other dimensions, other possibilities in the use and purpose and ends of consciousness is oddly 'anti-tragical', don't you think?
And if the psychedelic experience in soldiers tends to make them 'change careers', it does so because it renders on less likely to want to participate int he bustle of life and certainly in the carnage of war and conquest, so this tends to go in contra of part of what you are presenting. So where a dose of Greek Nietzschianism leads to an extention of the American Century into the present one and the engineering of 9/11 and whater other event is required to maintain a certain direction, a dose of Plant Teachers leads one...to pine for the higher planets...or at least for the sacred woods and rivers and fields of nature that are rapidly disappearing.
A funny anecdote: I know a fair number of Hindus, they are an unusual and sometimes comic bunch. But one fellow was telling me once that the Brahmins, those with access to certain knowledge, use special mantras to direct their next incarnation to 'higher planets'...and they have slowly been leaving the earth...and the way this fellow described it reminded me of someone unhappy with 'what was happening to the neighborhood' who decided to secure better real estate on the other side of town, away from all the riff-raff...
Is that what you mean when you say, 'Time to get out of Dodge'?
;-)
http://www.archive.org/details/mazatecmushroom
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R._Gordon_Wasson
Ni ange, ni bête
Re: Cui Bono?
Thanx for such a remarkable post Alex. A lot to think about. The ancient occidental and oriental sages often said to get out of dodge. The great cities were just too fucking crazy. The ideal Greek Polis was a relatively small place. Two outstanding centers come to mind which both existed at the same time: Athens & Kucha.
Only Kucha lasted a lot longer, until over run by the Mongols on their way to over running most of Asia. Of the two, I'd recommend going back in time to Kucha. When the Chinese emperor Tang Tiazong sent Xuan Zang to retrieve original Buddhist texts in 629 AD, he went first to Kucha. Which was like a college town, with scholars in Buddhism, Confucianism, Taoism, Zorastrianism, Vedic, Manichean, and other traditions. There were even some Nestorian Christians and prolly some Ashkenazic Jews. Kucha had access to both Oriental and Occidental traditions. Athens didnt.
The diff between Appalonian and Dionysian traditions would have seemed trival compared to the diversity in Kucha. Besides, the brothels in Kucha were so well regarded, the phrase "Kuchi coo" is still with us. Kuchan wine, which was laced with a variety of secret, but famously powerful ingredients was also enjoyed.
The problem presented by the Hindu tradition is to some extent written in the DNA of the Brahmin mind, but when Bengalese Saint Ramprasad writes of reality as a "projected matrix" he sounds like he knows something of quantum physics and chaos theory.
But if we leave all these questions aside, and consider the effects of the alternative, the literal interpretation of scripture, we can see the effect of ever greater levels of violence to force conversion. The Levantine zealots could get us all killed. And indeed, Moslem zealots are still operating in NW China, desecrating priceless Buddhist art and desecrating Tocharian graveyards looking for loot. That, anyway, is the virtual reality world I am presented with. There isnt anything significant I can do about it.
So, I work in my garden most mornings. Planted elephant garlic this morning, transplanted turnips yesterday. I have a 22, a 30-30, and a 12 guage pump. I also have 3 dogs, strays that showed up out of the woods, so they know their way around in it, and a set of PIR motion detectors. I dont expect to have to use that against hominids, but deer have been raiding, and soon as it cools off enuf, I'll have venison.
Yet, at the same time, I have the satellite dish and books to provide me with the words of the ancient sages, who I know would all envy me on that account. If I put these questions we've raised in this thread to them, they'd all say to get outta dodge, if not for the sake of your survival, at least for the sake of your sanity. I dont claim to know what happened on 9/11/01; but a rational system would have an ongoing effort to collect evidence and try to figure it out.
I got a note this morning, part of a trend, where people at NORAD are retiring, and now that they no longer have a career at risk, are posting what they think was going on, on 9/11/01 and before. Keeping this genie in the bottle is going to get progressively more difficult as more people retire and feel they are beyond the reach of the power elite.
It does look a lot like a video game, like the Bagavad Gita, with every greater forces gathering. And with crystal spheres of reality nested in each other. I read the myth of Peer Gynt has him see reality like an onion, and every time you peel a layer, there's another beneath it with hidden connections exposed to the light of day. And so you can go down, layer by layer, all the way to core. Which is empty.
If the proverbial schitt hits the fan, one city you may want to move to is New Orleans. I've been told that squatters are moving in. If you know how to live off the land, there's lots. Long growing season, greens do well all winter long, plenty of citrus, and with global warming, the bananas and other tropical fruits will be available free for the picking. And if the city can stay organized, its a simple matter to setup roadblocks to keep Madd Max's boys out. They have their own refineries. Mite even be able to keep the lights on.
And if things keep on going, the food & music in town is terrific. In my day, back in the 70's, the women were as well. The "Girls Gone Wild" video I have, made before Katrina, showed they still were, and from what I know of those there now, still are. But its no place to raise kids. Not yet, anyway.
Only Kucha lasted a lot longer, until over run by the Mongols on their way to over running most of Asia. Of the two, I'd recommend going back in time to Kucha. When the Chinese emperor Tang Tiazong sent Xuan Zang to retrieve original Buddhist texts in 629 AD, he went first to Kucha. Which was like a college town, with scholars in Buddhism, Confucianism, Taoism, Zorastrianism, Vedic, Manichean, and other traditions. There were even some Nestorian Christians and prolly some Ashkenazic Jews. Kucha had access to both Oriental and Occidental traditions. Athens didnt.
The diff between Appalonian and Dionysian traditions would have seemed trival compared to the diversity in Kucha. Besides, the brothels in Kucha were so well regarded, the phrase "Kuchi coo" is still with us. Kuchan wine, which was laced with a variety of secret, but famously powerful ingredients was also enjoyed.
The problem presented by the Hindu tradition is to some extent written in the DNA of the Brahmin mind, but when Bengalese Saint Ramprasad writes of reality as a "projected matrix" he sounds like he knows something of quantum physics and chaos theory.
But if we leave all these questions aside, and consider the effects of the alternative, the literal interpretation of scripture, we can see the effect of ever greater levels of violence to force conversion. The Levantine zealots could get us all killed. And indeed, Moslem zealots are still operating in NW China, desecrating priceless Buddhist art and desecrating Tocharian graveyards looking for loot. That, anyway, is the virtual reality world I am presented with. There isnt anything significant I can do about it.
So, I work in my garden most mornings. Planted elephant garlic this morning, transplanted turnips yesterday. I have a 22, a 30-30, and a 12 guage pump. I also have 3 dogs, strays that showed up out of the woods, so they know their way around in it, and a set of PIR motion detectors. I dont expect to have to use that against hominids, but deer have been raiding, and soon as it cools off enuf, I'll have venison.
Yet, at the same time, I have the satellite dish and books to provide me with the words of the ancient sages, who I know would all envy me on that account. If I put these questions we've raised in this thread to them, they'd all say to get outta dodge, if not for the sake of your survival, at least for the sake of your sanity. I dont claim to know what happened on 9/11/01; but a rational system would have an ongoing effort to collect evidence and try to figure it out.
I got a note this morning, part of a trend, where people at NORAD are retiring, and now that they no longer have a career at risk, are posting what they think was going on, on 9/11/01 and before. Keeping this genie in the bottle is going to get progressively more difficult as more people retire and feel they are beyond the reach of the power elite.
It does look a lot like a video game, like the Bagavad Gita, with every greater forces gathering. And with crystal spheres of reality nested in each other. I read the myth of Peer Gynt has him see reality like an onion, and every time you peel a layer, there's another beneath it with hidden connections exposed to the light of day. And so you can go down, layer by layer, all the way to core. Which is empty.
If the proverbial schitt hits the fan, one city you may want to move to is New Orleans. I've been told that squatters are moving in. If you know how to live off the land, there's lots. Long growing season, greens do well all winter long, plenty of citrus, and with global warming, the bananas and other tropical fruits will be available free for the picking. And if the city can stay organized, its a simple matter to setup roadblocks to keep Madd Max's boys out. They have their own refineries. Mite even be able to keep the lights on.
And if things keep on going, the food & music in town is terrific. In my day, back in the 70's, the women were as well. The "Girls Gone Wild" video I have, made before Katrina, showed they still were, and from what I know of those there now, still are. But its no place to raise kids. Not yet, anyway.
Goddess made sex for company.
Re: Cui Bono?
9/11 may or may not be an inside job. I looked into the matter at some depth over several months, and I did not reach a firm conclusion. I haven't given it much attention recently because it seems to me that what has been brought forward in terms of argument and evidence by now is about all that is ever going to be brought forward. People on both sides are rehashing the same arguments multiple times, and nothing new of significance is coming to light. For better or worse, 9/11 has begun to go the way of JFK. I think we can expect that any conclusions drawn from this point forward will be primarily a matter of belief rather than conclusive argument and evidence.
In simpler terms, aside from "true believer" types on either side, we will probably never really know.
In simpler terms, aside from "true believer" types on either side, we will probably never really know.
I live in a tub.
Re: Cui Bono?
--Unidian :
In simpler terms, aside from "true believer" types on either side, we will probably never really know.
Can you point me to a good 911 web page debunking the 'inside job' theory, since you have done so much reserch "at some deapth", that makes you unceartain to what had transpired on that day? Maybe I missed something...(just add the link to your original post, pls.)
o_O
ps. Don't you mean "I" or "you" when you say "we"? stop patronising the readers.
(source)we (w?)
pron.
Used by the speaker or writer to indicate the speaker or writer along with another or others as the subject: We made it to the lecture hall on time. We are planning a trip to Arizona this winter.
Used to refer to people in general, including the speaker or writer: “How can we enter the professions and yet remain civilized human beings?†(Virginia Woolf).
Used instead of I, especially by a writer wishing to reduce or avoid a subjective tone.
Used instead of I, especially by an editorialist, in expressing the opinion or point of view of a publication's management.
Used instead of I by a sovereign in formal address to refer to himself or herself.
Used instead of you in direct address, especially to imply a patronizing camaraderie with the addressee: How are we feeling today?
It's just a ride.
Re: Cui Bono?
The "Screw Loose Change" blog is a good source for debunking links and arguments. Google it if you're interested, although I have the distinct impression you really aren't.Can you point me to a good 911 web page debunking the 'inside job' theory, since you have done so much reserch "at some deapth", that makes you unceartain to what had transpired on that day? Maybe I missed something...(just add the link to your original post, pls.)
"We" in the context I was using it clearly refers to reasonable people as opposed to "true believers." I made that distinction clear. We, as in people who haven't reached a firm conclusion either way, may never know due to the deteriorating state of discourse on the subject. True believers already "know" and are not interested in argument or evidence that opposes their chosen position. This is consistent will several well-known aspects of human psychology.ps. Don't you mean "I" or "you" when you say "we"? stop patronising the readers.
I live in a tub.
Re: Cui Bono?
Screw Loose Change youtube vid.
Learn to do a proper investigation and make your mind up one way or the other.
This is one of the most important things in all of our lives. You can't build a house on a fence.
I am not a religious zealot and my time is precious, so I will not try to convince you if it's true or not, but I do want to help you.
You are not equipped to deal with "Intelligence" operations, so don't say "we the reasonable people" after doing a half-assed job.
Learn the tools of logic.
Fallacies
Straw man
Red herring
Propoganda
False flag
Sleight of hand(youtube vid)
Edit: This is a must read article on above Disinformation for 911
Don't go through life like cat without whiskers, life is too short. Open mind is good, but you can figure it out, if you try hard enough. Ignorance is bliss, but it also is a luxury you won't be able to afford for long.
They are lying to you.(BBC Reported Building 7 Collapse 20 Minutes before It Fell- Read the text at mark 2.20 and then look behind the reporter and see the building still standing, visible = left side, behind her head.)
Edit: Ahh, what the hell, i'll do it for you.
pic 1
pic 2
Still unsure if that is the building? (pic 3,4,5,etc)
Time to jump little grasshopper! :-P
Learn to do a proper investigation and make your mind up one way or the other.
This is one of the most important things in all of our lives. You can't build a house on a fence.
I am not a religious zealot and my time is precious, so I will not try to convince you if it's true or not, but I do want to help you.
You are not equipped to deal with "Intelligence" operations, so don't say "we the reasonable people" after doing a half-assed job.
Learn the tools of logic.
Fallacies
Straw man
Red herring
Propoganda
False flag
Sleight of hand(youtube vid)
Edit: This is a must read article on above Disinformation for 911
Don't go through life like cat without whiskers, life is too short. Open mind is good, but you can figure it out, if you try hard enough. Ignorance is bliss, but it also is a luxury you won't be able to afford for long.
They are lying to you.(BBC Reported Building 7 Collapse 20 Minutes before It Fell- Read the text at mark 2.20 and then look behind the reporter and see the building still standing, visible = left side, behind her head.)
Edit: Ahh, what the hell, i'll do it for you.
pic 1
pic 2
Still unsure if that is the building? (pic 3,4,5,etc)
Time to jump little grasshopper! :-P
Hitler On The Big Lie
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All this was inspired by the principle - which is quite true in itself - that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. These people know only too well how to use falsehood for the basest purposes. From time immemorial, however, the Jews have known better than any others how falsehood and calumny can be exploited. Is not their very existence founded on one great lie, namely, that they are a religious community, where as in reality they are a race? And what a race! One of the greatest thinkers that mankind has produced has branded the Jews for all time with a statement which is profoundly and exactly true. Schopenhauer called the Jew "The Great Master of Lies". Those who do not realize the truth of that statement, or do not wish to believe it, will never be able to lend a hand in helping Truth to prevail.
Last edited by hsandman on Sun Oct 14, 2007 5:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
It's just a ride.
Re: Cui Bono?
I've already looked at that and everything else. You are clearly a "true believer" and your condescending demeanor reflects it. True believers are never capable of conducting competent research because they have already drawn an irrefutable conclusion in their own minds. If I want to be harassed by the faithful, I'll stroll down to my local church, thanks.
I live in a tub.
Re: Cui Bono?
Even Hitler, that master of the big lie, could be deceived. The "Jews" he speaks of are the Ashkenazi, who, while the history was obscure in his time could have been looked up, to reveal that they did not come from Palestine, but *Sogdia*. The Ashkenazic Jews were *Aryans*, and more pure bred than Hitler's own Germans.
But he was certainly correct in the method to bring the masses along to reach a big lie like 911. Only thing is, that now we have the net, and the kind of central control the Nazis and Neocons have relied on is slowly breaking down.
One of the reasons has to do with group think, and how those who were in the system to know something about the 911 event are now retiring, then having time to think outside the group they were a part of, and now starting to post what they know. This is only going to get worse as more boomers retire, and are free to think their own thots about what they witnessed.
Its why I've been saying to ask welder about this photo:
http://www.911myths.com/assets/images/molten_steel.jpg
An engineer, architect, chemist, or academic has to consider the effect of his comments on the future of his career, and dare not speak a truth which is at variance with the group think of his profession. But nobody cares what a welder thinks. He knows that. He can speak the truth, and knows what it takes to get steel that color orange, much less yellow. (it aint jet fuel)
Retirees cleaning out their desks will come across bits of data like this, and suddenly freed of the intimidation of the power structure, will be stepping forward to post what they know. I dont claim to know what happened on 9/11/01, only that I know we've been lied to.
But he was certainly correct in the method to bring the masses along to reach a big lie like 911. Only thing is, that now we have the net, and the kind of central control the Nazis and Neocons have relied on is slowly breaking down.
One of the reasons has to do with group think, and how those who were in the system to know something about the 911 event are now retiring, then having time to think outside the group they were a part of, and now starting to post what they know. This is only going to get worse as more boomers retire, and are free to think their own thots about what they witnessed.
Its why I've been saying to ask welder about this photo:
http://www.911myths.com/assets/images/molten_steel.jpg
An engineer, architect, chemist, or academic has to consider the effect of his comments on the future of his career, and dare not speak a truth which is at variance with the group think of his profession. But nobody cares what a welder thinks. He knows that. He can speak the truth, and knows what it takes to get steel that color orange, much less yellow. (it aint jet fuel)
Retirees cleaning out their desks will come across bits of data like this, and suddenly freed of the intimidation of the power structure, will be stepping forward to post what they know. I dont claim to know what happened on 9/11/01, only that I know we've been lied to.
Goddess made sex for company.
Re: Cui Bono?
daybrown:
Steel melting temprature
Jet fuell burning temprature
These things by themselves, while being suspicious can be dismissed by constructing all kinds of arguments (that begin to boarder on laughable from some of the spin-doctor sites I have checked out)
It is the proverbial "god argument"
Person A: You have no evidence god exists!
Person B: You have no evidence that he does not exist!
Etc.
What you have to do is look at the whole situation from different perspective. Forming a broader overview of the events and physical evidence such as laws of physics and how they correspond to reality.
For example: Calling THIS a "Collapse" is like calling a volcano a "bonfire" = 1984 newspeak. (You have to start to wonder what is wrong with people’s perception of reality, no?)
I think Hitler was wrong about the jews being an "evil" race of people. From what I know of it, he was influenced a lot by writings of Nietzche. = Eugenics. ( I have noticed lot of people on this board also being influenced by those ideas. "Fertility clinics for mass murderers and thugs"? (That is what millitary is!That is in their job descripton :S ) very Hitler like ideas = cold logic.)
IMO. it has to do with upbringing, tradition and religion that makes people what they are... jews just have more of that garbage imprinted on them from parents etc.
I, personally know few jews who are good people, i.e. : not pathalogical liars,honest in busness dealings,with humane outlook on other races etc. BUT... they are not religious, they have not read the thalmud, they never grew up in the social surroundings where such beliefs are acquired.
While, I agree that such parasitic tactics (zionism) work very well (after all they do have the human race by the neck), they will ultimately lead (and are well on the way) to total annihilation. The history of Easter Island and Aztec Empire is the example of such "Dog eat dog" (pun intended) attitude towards other human beings. Machiavellian idea that it is to be better feared than loved (source)is a flawed idea and short term solution at best, because fear ultimately brings destruction to the "feared" as it does to the "afraidâ€. The thoughtlessness, cruelty and disregard of other fellow organisms on this planet, by small percentage of selfish psychopaths will surely lead us to annihilation. People can learn a lot from Roman history.
Steel melting temprature
Jet fuell burning temprature
These things by themselves, while being suspicious can be dismissed by constructing all kinds of arguments (that begin to boarder on laughable from some of the spin-doctor sites I have checked out)
It is the proverbial "god argument"
Person A: You have no evidence god exists!
Person B: You have no evidence that he does not exist!
Etc.
What you have to do is look at the whole situation from different perspective. Forming a broader overview of the events and physical evidence such as laws of physics and how they correspond to reality.
For example: Calling THIS a "Collapse" is like calling a volcano a "bonfire" = 1984 newspeak. (You have to start to wonder what is wrong with people’s perception of reality, no?)
I think Hitler was wrong about the jews being an "evil" race of people. From what I know of it, he was influenced a lot by writings of Nietzche. = Eugenics. ( I have noticed lot of people on this board also being influenced by those ideas. "Fertility clinics for mass murderers and thugs"? (That is what millitary is!That is in their job descripton :S ) very Hitler like ideas = cold logic.)
IMO. it has to do with upbringing, tradition and religion that makes people what they are... jews just have more of that garbage imprinted on them from parents etc.
I, personally know few jews who are good people, i.e. : not pathalogical liars,honest in busness dealings,with humane outlook on other races etc. BUT... they are not religious, they have not read the thalmud, they never grew up in the social surroundings where such beliefs are acquired.
While, I agree that such parasitic tactics (zionism) work very well (after all they do have the human race by the neck), they will ultimately lead (and are well on the way) to total annihilation. The history of Easter Island and Aztec Empire is the example of such "Dog eat dog" (pun intended) attitude towards other human beings. Machiavellian idea that it is to be better feared than loved (source)is a flawed idea and short term solution at best, because fear ultimately brings destruction to the "feared" as it does to the "afraidâ€. The thoughtlessness, cruelty and disregard of other fellow organisms on this planet, by small percentage of selfish psychopaths will surely lead us to annihilation. People can learn a lot from Roman history.
There are other races out there (my personal assumption that I arrived by using logic and info) who will/are resent(full) of such ideology, or they maybe here merely as a tourists (gah!) to watch the big show of 2012..(still unclear = "on the fence" for now :) ) Either way... unless people wake up from this dream into the nightmare of the reality they will not even notice or understand why they are "depressed" and unhappy. You need a purpose in life. The minimum wage slavery is not it. (many subconsciously know that.)FAKE TERROR - THE ROAD TO DICTATORSHIP
Note: This article first appeared as a post written by myself at Free
Republic in late 2000. I was surprised to learn that it was copied
re-posted at dozens of sites around the world. So, it seems only fitting
that the article (with some updating) should re-appear here on my own web
site.
FAKE TERROR -
THE ROAD TO WAR AND DICTATORSHIP
It's the oldest trick in the book, dating back to Roman times; creating
the enemies you need.
In 70 BC, an ambitious minor politician and extremely wealthy man, Marcus
Licinius Crassus, wanted to rule Rome. Just to give you an idea of what
sort of man Crassus really was, he is credited with invention of the fire
brigade. But in Crassus' version, his fire-fighting slaves would race to
the scene of a burning building whereupon Crassus would offer to buy it on
the spot for a tiny fraction of it's worth. If the owner sold, Crassus'
slaves would put out the fire. If the owner refused to sell, Crassus
allowed the building to burn to the ground. By means of this device,
Crassus eventually came to be the largest single private land holder in
Rome, and used some of his wealth to help back Julius Caesar against
Cicero.
In 70 BC Rome was still a Republic, which placed very strict limits on
what Rulers could do, and more importantly NOT do. But Crassus had no
intentions of enduring such limits to his personal power, and contrived a
plan.
Crassus seized upon the slave revolt led by Spartacus in order to strike
terror into the hearts of Rome, whose garrison Spartacus had already
defeated in battle. But Spartacus had no intention of marching on Rome
itself, a move he knew to be suicidal. Spartacus and his band wanted
nothing to do with the Roman empire and had planned from the start merely
to loot enough money from their former owners in the Italian countryside
to hire a mercenary fleet in which to sail to freedom.
Sailing away was the last thing Crassus wanted Spartacus to do. He needed
a convenient enemy with which to terrorize Rome itself for his personal
political gain. So Crassus bribed the mercenary fleet to sail without
Spartacus, then positioned two Roman legions in such a way that Spartacus
had no choice but to march on Rome.
Terrified of the impending arrival of the much-feared army of gladiators,
Rome declared Crassus Praetor. Crassus then crushed Spartacus' army and
even though Pompey took the credit, Crassus was elected Consul of Rome the
following year.
With this maneuver, the Romans surrendered their Republican form of
government. Soon would follow the first Triumvirate, consisting of
Crassus, Pompeii, and Julius Caesar, followed by the reign of the god-like
Emperors of Rome.
The Romans were hoaxed into surrendering their Republic, and accepting the
rule of Emperors.
Julius Caesar's political opponent, Cicero, for all his literary
accomplishments, played the same games in his campaign against Julius
Caesar, claiming that Rome was falling victim to an internal "vast right
wing" conspiracy in which any expressed desire for legislative limits on
government was treated as suspicious behavior. Cicero, in order to
demonstrate to the Romans just how unsafe Rome has become hired thugs to
cause as much disturbance as possible, and campaigned on a promise to end
the internal strife if elected and granted extraordinary powers.
What Cicero only dreamed of, Adolph Hitler succeeded in doing. Elected
Chancellor of Germany, Hitler, like Crassus, had no intention of living
with the strict limits to his power imposed by German law. Unlike Cicero,
Hitler's thugs were easy to recognize; they all wore the same brown
shirts. But their actions were no different than those of their Roman
predecessors. They staged beatings, set fires, caused as much trouble as
they could, while Hitler made speeches promising that he could end the
crime wave of subversives and terrorism if he was granted extraordinary
powers.
Then the Reichstag burned down; a staged terrorist attack.
The Germans were hoaxed into surrendering their Republic, and accepting
the total rule of Der Fuehrer. Hitler had German troops dressed in Polish
uniforms attack the radio station at Gliewitz, then lied to the Germans,
telling them Poland had invaded, and marched Germany off into World War
Two
The state-sponsored schools will never tell you this, but governments
routinely rely on hoaxes to sell their agendas to an otherwise reluctant
public. The Romans accepted the Emperors and the Germans accepted Hitler
not because they wanted to, but because the carefully crafted illusions of
threat appeared to leave no other choice.
Our government too uses hoaxes to create the illusion that We The People
have no choice but the direction the government wishes us to go in.
In 1898, Joseph Pulitzer's New York World and William Randolph Hearst's
New York Journal were arguing for American intervention in Cuba. Hearst is
reported to have dispatched a photographer to Cuba to photograph the
coming war with Spain. When the photographer asked just what war that
might be, Hearst is reported to have replied, "You take the photographs,
and I will provide the war". Hearst was true to his word, as his newspaper
published stories of great atrocities being committed against the Cuban
people, most of which turned out to be complete fabrications.
On the night of February 15, 1898, the USS Maine, lying in Havana harbor
in a show of US resolve to protect her interests, exploded violently.
Captain Sigsbee, the commander of the Maine, urged that no assumptions of
enemy attack be made until there was a full investigation of the cause of
the explosion. For this, Captain Sigsbee was excoriated in the press for
"refusing to see the obvious". The Atlantic Monthly declared flat out that
to suppose the explosion to be anything other than a deliberate act by
Spain was "completely at defiance of the laws of probability".
Under the slogan "Remember the Maine", Americans went to war with Spain,
eventually winning the Philippines (and annexing Hawaii along the way).
In 1975, an investigation led by Admiral Hyman Rickover examined the data
recovered from a 1911 examination of the wreck and concluded that there
had been no evidence of an external explosion. The most likely cause of
the sinking was a coal dust explosion in a coal bunker imprudently located
next to the ship's magazines. Captain Sigsbee's caution had been well
founded.
President Franklin Delano Roosevelt needed a war. He needed the fever of a
major war to mask the symptoms of a still deathly ill economy struggling
back from the Great Depression (and mutating towards Socialism at the same
time). Roosevelt wanted a war with Germany to stop Hitler, but despite
several provocations in the Atlantic, the American people, still
struggling with that troublesome economy, were opposed to any wars.
Roosevelt violated neutrality with lend lease, and even ordered the
sinking of several German ships in the Atlantic, but Hitler refused to be
provoked.
Roosevelt needed an enemy, and if America would not willingly attack that
enemy, then one would have to be maneuvered into attacking America, much
as Marcus Licinius Crassus has maneuvered Spartacus into attacking Rome.
The way open to war was created when Japan signed the tripartite agreement
with Italy and Germany, with all parties pledging mutual defense to each
other. Whereas Hitler would never declare war on the United States no
matter the provocation, the means to force Japan to do so were readily at
hand.
The first step was to place oil and steel embargoes on Japan, using
Japan's wars on the Asian mainland as a reason. This forced Japan to
consider seizing the oil and mineral rich regions in Indonesia. With the
European powers militarily exhausted by the war in Europe, the United
States was the only power in the Pacific able to stop Japan from invading
the Dutch East Indies, and by moving the Pacific fleet from San Diego to
Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, Roosevelt made a pre-emptive strike on that fleet
the mandatory first step in any Japanese plan to extend it's empire into
the "southern resource area".
Roosevelt boxed in Japan just as completely as Crassus had boxed in
Spartacus. Japan needed oil. They had to invade Indonesia to get it, and
to do that they first had to remove the threat of the American fleet at
Pearl Harbor. There never really was any other course open to them.
To enrage the American people as much as possible, Roosevelt needed the
first overt attack by Japan to be as bloody as possible, appearing as a
sneak attack much as the Japanese had done to the Russians. From that
moment up until the attack on Pearl Harbor itself, Roosevelt and his
associates made sure that the commanders in Hawaii, General Short and
Admiral Kimmel, were kept in the dark as much as possible about the
location of the Japanese fleet and it's intentions, then later scapegoated
for the attack. (Congress recently exonerated both Short and Kimmel,
posthumously restoring them to their former ranks).
But as the Army board had concluded at the time, and subsequent
de-classified documents confirmed, Washington DC knew the attack was
coming, knew exactly where the Japanese fleet was, and knew where it was
headed.
On November 29th, Secretary of State Hull showed United Press reporter Joe
Leib a message with the time and place of the attack, and the New York
Times in it's special 12/8/41 Pearl Harbor edition, on page 13, reported
that the time and place of the attack had been known in advance!
The much repeated claim that the Japanese fleet maintained radio silence
on it's way to Hawaii was a lie. Among other intercepts still held in the
Archives of the NSA is the UNCODED message sent by the Japanese tanker
Shirya stating, "proceeding to a position 30.00 N, 154.20 E. Expect to
arrive at that point on 3 December." (near HI)
President Lyndon Johnson wanted a war in Vietnam. He wanted it to help his
friends who owned defense companies to do a little business. He needed it
to get the Pentagon and CIA to quit trying to invade Cuba. And most of
all, he needed a provocation to convince the American people that there
was really "no other choice".
On August 5, 1964, newspapers across America reported "renewed attacks"
against American destroyers operating in Vietnamese waters, specifically
the Gulf of Tonkin. The official story was that North Vietnamese torpedo
boats launched an "unprovoked attack" on the USS Maddox while it was on
"routine patrol".
The truth is that USS Maddox was involved in aggressive intelligence
gathering in coordination with actual attacks by South Vietnam and the
Laotian Air Force against targets in North Vietnam. The truth is also that
there was no attack by torpedo boats against the USS Maddox. Captain John
J. Herrick, the task force commander in the Gulf, cabled Washington DC
that the report was the result of an "over-eager" sonar man who had picked
up the sounds of his own ship's screws and panicked. But even with this
knowledge that the report was false, Lyndon Johnson went on national TV
that night to announce the commencement of air strikes against North
Vietnam, "retaliation" for an attack that had never occurred.
President George H. W. Bush wanted a war in Iraq. Like Crassus, George
Bush is motivated by money. Specifically oil money. But with the OPEC
alliance failing to keep limits on oil production in the Mideast, the
market was being glutted with oil pumped from underneath Iraq, which sat
over roughly 1/3 of the oil reserves of the entire region.
George wanted a war to stop that flow of oil, to keep prices (and profits)
from falling any further than they already had. But like Roosevelt, he
needed the "other side" to make the first move.
Iraq had long been trying to acquire greater access to the Persian Gulf,
and felt limited confined a narrow strip of land along Kuwait's northern
border, which placed Iraqi interests in close proximity with hostile Iran.
George Bush, who had been covertly arming Iraq during its war with Iran,
sent word via April Glaspie that the United States would not intervene if
Saddam Hussein grabbed a larger part of Kuwait. Saddam fell for the bait
and invaded.
Of course, Americans were not about to send their sons and daughters to
risk their lives for petroleum products. So George Bush arranged a hoax,
using a public relations firm which has grown rich on taxpayer money by
being most industrious and creative liars! The PR firm concocted a
monumental fraud in which the daughter of the Kuwaiti Ambassador to the
United States, went on TV pretending to be a nurse, and related a horror
story in which Iraqi troops looted the incubators from a Kuwaiti hospital,
leaving the premature babies on the cold floor to die. The media, part of
the swindle from the start, never bothered asking why the "nurse" didn't
just pick the babies up and wrap them in blankets or something.
Enraged by the incubator story, Americans supported operation Desert
Storm, which never removed Saddam Hussein from power but which did take
Kuwait's oil off of the market for almost 2 years and limited Iraq's oil
exports to this very day. That our sons and daughters came home with
serious and lingering medical illnesses was apparently not too great a
price to pay for increased oil profits.
Following the victory in Iraq, yet another war appeared to be in the
offering in the mineral rich regions of Bosnia. Yet again, a hoax was used
to create support for military action.
The photo (right) of Fikret Alic staring through a barbed wire fence, was
used to "prove" the existence of modern day "Concentration Camps". As the
headline of "Belsen 92" indicates, all possible associations with the Nazi
horrors were made to sell the necessity of sending yet more American
troops into someone else's nation.
But when German Journalists went to Trnopolje, the site of the supposed
Concentration Camp. to film a documentary, they discovered that the photo
was a fake! The camp at Trnopolje was not a concentration camp but a
refugee center. Nor was it surrounded by barbed wire. Careful examination
of the original photo revealed that the photographer had shot the photo
through a broken section of fence surrounding a tool shed. It was the
photographer who was on the inside, shooting out at the refugees.
Once again, Americans had been hoaxed into support of actions they might
otherwise not have agreed with.
While several American Presidents have willingly started wars for personal
purposes, perhaps no President has ever carried it to the extreme that
Bill Clinton has.
Coincident with the expected public statement of Monica Lewinsky following
her testimony, Bill Clinton ordered a cruise missile attack on Sudan and
Afghanistan, claiming to have had irrefutable proof that bogeyman
extraordinaire (and former Afghani ally) Osama Bin Ladin was creating
terrorist chemical weapons there.
Examination of the photos of the debris revealed none of the expected
structures one would find in a laboratory that handled lethal
weapons-grade materials. Assurances from the CIA that they had a positive
soil test for biological weapons fell on their face when it was revealed
that there had been no open soil anywhere near the pre-bombed facility.
Sudan requested that international observers come test the remains of the
factory for any signs of the nerve gas Clinton had insisted was there.
None was found. The Sudanese plant was a harmless aspirin factory, and the
owner has sued for damages.
Later examination of the site hit in Afghanistan revealed it to be a mosque.
Click for larger image
Meanwhile, back in Kosovo, stories about genocide and atrocities were
flooding the media (in time to distract from the Sudanese embarrassments),
just as lurid and sensational and as it turns out often just as fictional
as most of William Randolph Hearst's stories of atrocities against the
Cubans.
Again, the government and the media were hoaxing Americans. The above
photo was shown on all the American networks, claiming to be one of
Slobodan Milosovic's Migs, shot down while attacking civilians. Closer
examination (click on the photo) shows it to be stenciled in English!
Like Germany under Chancellor Hitler, there have been events in our nation
which strike fear into the hearts of the citizens, such as the New York
World Trade Tower bombing, the OK City Federal Building, and the Olympic
Park bomb (nicely timed to divert the media from witnesses to the TWA 800
shoot down). The media has been very quick to blame such events on
"radicals", "subversives", "vast right wing conspiracies", and other
"enemies in our midst", no different than the lies used by Cicero and
Hitler.
But on closer examination, such "domestic terrorist" events do not appear
to be what they are made out to be. The FBI had an informant inside the
World Trade Tower bombers, Emad Salam, who offered to sabotage the bomb.
The FBI told him "no". The so-called "hot bed" of white separatism at
Elohim City, occasional home to Tim McVeigh in the weeks prior to the OK
City bombing, was founded and is being run by an FBI informant!
And nobody has ever really explained what this second Ryder truck was
doing in a secret camp half way from Elohim City to Oklahoma City two
weeks before the bombing.
So, here we are today. Like the Romans of Crassus' and Cicero's time, or
the Germans under a newly elected Hitler, we are being warned that a
dangerous enemy threatens us, implacable, invisible, omnipresent, and
invulnerable as long as our government is hamstrung by that silly old Bill
of Rights. Already there have appeared articles debating whether or not
"extraordinary measures" (i.e. torture) are not fully justified under
certain circumstances such as those we are purported to face.
As was the case in Rome and Germany, the government continues to plead
with the public for an expansion of its power and authority, to "deal with
the crisis".
However, as Casio watch timers are paraded before the cameras, to the
stentorian tones of the talking heads' constant dire warnings, it is
legitimate to question just how real the crises is, and how much is the
result of political machinations by our own leaders.
Are the terrorists really a threat, or just hired actors with bombs and
Casio watches, paid for by Cicero and given brown shirts to wear by
Hitler?
Is terrorism inside the United States really from outside, or is it a
stage managed production, designed to cause Americans to believe they have
no choice but to surrender the Republic and accept the totalitarian rule
of a new emperor, or a new Fuhrer?
Once lost, the Romans never got their Republic back. Once lost, the
Germans never got their Republic back. In both cases, the nation had to
totally collapse before freedom was restored to the people.
Remember that when Crassus tells you that Spartacus approaches.
Remember that when thugs in the streets act in a manner clearly designed
to provoke the public fear.
Remember that when the Reichstag burns down.
Remember that when the President lies to you about weapons of mass
destruction.
It's just a ride.
Re: Cui Bono?
Polite discourse appreciated Hsandman. But I'm not talking about the melting of steel. The photo shows it glowing orange, and then yellow, while still being solid enuf to pick up. But if you've worked with a welding torch, then you know that you are not going to get that color burning Jet fuel without a sophisticated way of delivering oxygen to the point of combustion- if that be possible at all.
I dont claim to know why the towers fell. The photo is evidence that something else was burning that should not have been in the building, and I'd appreciate a careful investigation into what that was, and why it was there. If, as posted, it was thermate or thermite, and if as posted, explosives were used to blow the resulting melted steel away, then tiny droplets of steel would have been blown out from the point of explosion, harden in the air, and fly across the street like shotgun pellets. Some would naturally land in crevices, window sills, or other such niches in the architecture in the area. All you need to do, is go there with a dental pick, a magnifying glass, and a magnet.
Pluck out some of the debris from cracks in the sidewalks, gutters, or wherever, and have a look. If explosives blew molten steel out of the towers, then you'll see little balls of it stuck to the magnet, 50 microns up to maybe a milimeter in diameter. I've seen this posted, but I've not seen where anyone, out of all the millions who live on the island of Manhattan, actually got off his ass to go look. <sniff> That smells like some kind of manipulated reality; a virtual matrix. I cant really get my panties in a wad about it. Nor can I get wound up about all the ignorant attempts by desk jockies to refute the meaning of the yellow steel; I understand how group think works, they, apparently, do not.
Another classic example is how Hitler could claim the mantle of Nietzsche's Ubermench. Nietzsche, "The Genealogy of Morals", chap XXVI:"I have no patience with mummies who try to mimic life, with worn-out, used-up people who swathe themselves in wisdom so as to appear 'objective', with histrionic agitators who wear magic hoods on their straw heads, with ambitious artists who try to pass for ascetics and priests, yet are, at bottom, only tragic bufoons. And I am equally out of patience with those newest speculators in idealism called anti-Semites, who parade as Christian-Aryan worthies and endeavor to stir up all the asinine elements of the nation by that cheapest of propaganda tricks, a moral attitude."
And this is not the only place where Nietzsche takes anti-Semites to task. So... how is it, that among the millions of liberal opponents of Hitler, none of them noticed this? <sniff> Again, it smells like a put-up job. This is not random, but the hand of Fate, or some force manipulating events and the way people can think.
Bush at least, makes some kind of machiavellian sense. The people are not rational enuf to see what is in their own best interest. Which, I first realized by going to the back pages in 1964 to read what Goldwater actually said, rather than what the media said he said. They were too stupid then to get beyond the front page, and have gotten dumber since.
And since Americans were stupid enuf to buy and drive gas hog SUVs, Bush needed a false flag event to go into the Mid East to secure the global supply of oil. Which Mossad, Silverstein, and other Wall Street Jews and Christians gave him on 9/11/01. They also made a trillion or so on the deal with put calls. Which- while this info has not made a dent here, I see was published in Switzerland by some of their financial analysts.
There was a damn good case to be made for invading the Mid East to secure the global supply of oil and cut off the flow of money to Islamic terrorists, but everyone knows the public is too stupid to get it. And now, I dont doubt that AIRPAC got behind passing the Armenian genocide resolution. Are the Anti-Semites going to claim the Armenian genocide didnt happen? <snurk> So, with the Green Zone being a hardened control center, with the world's biggest US embassy, they'll part out Iraq, with Turkey next, giving the Kurds back that part of Turkey they always had, and arming the Kurds in Iran.
The whole area, like Yugoslavia, will be Balkanized, so that the transnational can, as they just did with the Kurds, make deals with each little part for whatever oil they sit on. All in the name of self-determination. Mite work; the unity of Al Qida and the Jihadim will break down to ancient tribal partisanship, and they will squabble among themselves rather than sending terrorists to Europe or wherever. And the price of gas will drop back twards 2$/gal.
I dont claim to know why the towers fell. The photo is evidence that something else was burning that should not have been in the building, and I'd appreciate a careful investigation into what that was, and why it was there. If, as posted, it was thermate or thermite, and if as posted, explosives were used to blow the resulting melted steel away, then tiny droplets of steel would have been blown out from the point of explosion, harden in the air, and fly across the street like shotgun pellets. Some would naturally land in crevices, window sills, or other such niches in the architecture in the area. All you need to do, is go there with a dental pick, a magnifying glass, and a magnet.
Pluck out some of the debris from cracks in the sidewalks, gutters, or wherever, and have a look. If explosives blew molten steel out of the towers, then you'll see little balls of it stuck to the magnet, 50 microns up to maybe a milimeter in diameter. I've seen this posted, but I've not seen where anyone, out of all the millions who live on the island of Manhattan, actually got off his ass to go look. <sniff> That smells like some kind of manipulated reality; a virtual matrix. I cant really get my panties in a wad about it. Nor can I get wound up about all the ignorant attempts by desk jockies to refute the meaning of the yellow steel; I understand how group think works, they, apparently, do not.
Another classic example is how Hitler could claim the mantle of Nietzsche's Ubermench. Nietzsche, "The Genealogy of Morals", chap XXVI:"I have no patience with mummies who try to mimic life, with worn-out, used-up people who swathe themselves in wisdom so as to appear 'objective', with histrionic agitators who wear magic hoods on their straw heads, with ambitious artists who try to pass for ascetics and priests, yet are, at bottom, only tragic bufoons. And I am equally out of patience with those newest speculators in idealism called anti-Semites, who parade as Christian-Aryan worthies and endeavor to stir up all the asinine elements of the nation by that cheapest of propaganda tricks, a moral attitude."
And this is not the only place where Nietzsche takes anti-Semites to task. So... how is it, that among the millions of liberal opponents of Hitler, none of them noticed this? <sniff> Again, it smells like a put-up job. This is not random, but the hand of Fate, or some force manipulating events and the way people can think.
Bush at least, makes some kind of machiavellian sense. The people are not rational enuf to see what is in their own best interest. Which, I first realized by going to the back pages in 1964 to read what Goldwater actually said, rather than what the media said he said. They were too stupid then to get beyond the front page, and have gotten dumber since.
And since Americans were stupid enuf to buy and drive gas hog SUVs, Bush needed a false flag event to go into the Mid East to secure the global supply of oil. Which Mossad, Silverstein, and other Wall Street Jews and Christians gave him on 9/11/01. They also made a trillion or so on the deal with put calls. Which- while this info has not made a dent here, I see was published in Switzerland by some of their financial analysts.
There was a damn good case to be made for invading the Mid East to secure the global supply of oil and cut off the flow of money to Islamic terrorists, but everyone knows the public is too stupid to get it. And now, I dont doubt that AIRPAC got behind passing the Armenian genocide resolution. Are the Anti-Semites going to claim the Armenian genocide didnt happen? <snurk> So, with the Green Zone being a hardened control center, with the world's biggest US embassy, they'll part out Iraq, with Turkey next, giving the Kurds back that part of Turkey they always had, and arming the Kurds in Iran.
The whole area, like Yugoslavia, will be Balkanized, so that the transnational can, as they just did with the Kurds, make deals with each little part for whatever oil they sit on. All in the name of self-determination. Mite work; the unity of Al Qida and the Jihadim will break down to ancient tribal partisanship, and they will squabble among themselves rather than sending terrorists to Europe or wherever. And the price of gas will drop back twards 2$/gal.
Goddess made sex for company.
Re: Cui Bono?
daybrown: I don't really care about 911 anymore. I have spent months investigating it from both sides of the argument. I am done with it.
Believe what you want. The distribution of molten metal droplets via kinetic energy of the explosion throughout the surrounding area is a good test, and if found to be correct/incorrect I guess would be another 12345 +1 piece of the puzzle. The fact that there was lots of molten steel in the basement is reaffirmed by this video testimony.
ps. I personally don't hold Machiavelli, Nietczhe and Hitler in high esteem, they were highly intelligent people, but I think they were quite the asshats with superiority complex. Just like the current genocidal, demonical and arrogant asshats in power of the world.
In my opinion OIL > BLOOD. = WRONG!
Who cares about the 6 million jews who died? Enough with the holocaust of the jews! The fat and rich zionist jews in power seem to not give hoot about the fact that George Bush family has contributed to it, else they would not be part of this NWO!
Here is a little perspective. (count the zeros)
Here is more
Why are there no museums on this page to victims of Pol Pot? 77 million! or Stalin? 50 million! or countless others ... how many millions died because of cancer and other "industrial age" diseases? How many will die in coming years because of the chemtrails,wars,aspertite etc etc etc.? How many died because they were not educated enough to understand what is good and bad for them? Why there are no museums built commemorating them? Could it be that there are no Chinese Steven Spilbergs to donate for one, but there are lot of jewish ones? 6 million jews die with zionist and christian blessings and they get museum and a special name for that event. The killers of 3000+ are still smiling on the tv feeding lies, while 1+ million of the "sand monkeys" have been killed in "revenge" even though there are no links form Al Qaida to Iraq, even if Al Qaida was to blame and not an assed of CIA! They did not find any WMD's In Iraq!. The fat, docile cattle sitting on the couches and chewing other cattle can't add 2+2 together ... It's 4! Wake up! There are no terrorists except American governament and the masters pulling the strings. It's not a war when one side loses millions and other one few thousand. <- That is a Holocaust! The people who defend the country of their ancestors from highly advanced and powerful military invasion. They are not called terrorists , but freedom fighters.
Look around and see where you live.
I am done here. Fare well.
Believe what you want. The distribution of molten metal droplets via kinetic energy of the explosion throughout the surrounding area is a good test, and if found to be correct/incorrect I guess would be another 12345 +1 piece of the puzzle. The fact that there was lots of molten steel in the basement is reaffirmed by this video testimony.
ps. I personally don't hold Machiavelli, Nietczhe and Hitler in high esteem, they were highly intelligent people, but I think they were quite the asshats with superiority complex. Just like the current genocidal, demonical and arrogant asshats in power of the world.
In my opinion OIL > BLOOD. = WRONG!
Who cares about the 6 million jews who died? Enough with the holocaust of the jews! The fat and rich zionist jews in power seem to not give hoot about the fact that George Bush family has contributed to it, else they would not be part of this NWO!
Here is a little perspective. (count the zeros)
Here is more
Why are there no museums on this page to victims of Pol Pot? 77 million! or Stalin? 50 million! or countless others ... how many millions died because of cancer and other "industrial age" diseases? How many will die in coming years because of the chemtrails,wars,aspertite etc etc etc.? How many died because they were not educated enough to understand what is good and bad for them? Why there are no museums built commemorating them? Could it be that there are no Chinese Steven Spilbergs to donate for one, but there are lot of jewish ones? 6 million jews die with zionist and christian blessings and they get museum and a special name for that event. The killers of 3000+ are still smiling on the tv feeding lies, while 1+ million of the "sand monkeys" have been killed in "revenge" even though there are no links form Al Qaida to Iraq, even if Al Qaida was to blame and not an assed of CIA! They did not find any WMD's In Iraq!. The fat, docile cattle sitting on the couches and chewing other cattle can't add 2+2 together ... It's 4! Wake up! There are no terrorists except American governament and the masters pulling the strings. It's not a war when one side loses millions and other one few thousand. <- That is a Holocaust! The people who defend the country of their ancestors from highly advanced and powerful military invasion. They are not called terrorists , but freedom fighters.
Look around and see where you live.
I am done here. Fare well.
Last edited by hsandman on Sun Oct 14, 2007 4:49 am, edited 3 times in total.
It's just a ride.
Re: Cui Bono?
We agree on that much. And that is really the important part.In my opinion OIL > BLOOD. = WRONG!
I live in a tub.