GENIUS FORUMS

The application of logic requires the containment of one's I within the boundaries of belief in dualism. To rely on an objective image of subjective attachment, such as is A =A or A is A before one opens one's mouth, is to place oneself in the shadow of memory, which is the belief in being separate from one's [shadowless] I Am.

Most men are content to accept this shadow of thought recollection, declaring it a hedge or gap that is impossible to cross. You can't cross this hedge or gap, most men will say, and yet, those who have wisdom of the infinite acknowledge that the hedge or gap of human thought recollection is an imaginary gap. There is no gap in infinity, by its very definition of being infinite, the wisdom man of dual worlds says, BUT...

Is this not the insanity laid bare of the wisdom of man who comprehends that what is imagined is not real, that is, the imagined gap of recollection between his infinite I Am and his finite I am, and yet, in the same breath, he states that it is impossible to cross over or eliminate, within himself, that which is not real?

Aha. Ahahaha. Ahahahahaha!

It is pretty funny. :)

-

By my understanding, retorts are not demonstrations of wisdom.

movingalways wrote:The application of logic requires the containment of one's I within the boundaries of belief in dualism. To rely on an objective image of subjective attachment, such as is A =A or A is A before one opens one's mouth, is to place oneself in the shadow of memory, which is the belief in being separate from one's [shadowless] I Am.

Them's fightin' words!

movingalways wrote:By my understanding, retorts are not demonstrations of wisdom.

Clearly, they are demonstrations of idiocy ..... :)

-

Will (s)he get the irony...?