GENIUS FORUMS

It's there.

And?

What I see:
A perfect world.

Since the world is what it must be, I'm not sure "perfect" is actually a meaningful descriptor. I do think I get your point, however.

Metaphor

Never give power to anything a person believes is their source of strength - jufa

HUH?
A perfect world would be a perfect world..

If perfection is not a metaphor then imperfection would be perfection.

If the world was perfect there would be no death. Or perfection of death would be reached for instead of feared.

Never give power to anything a person believes is their source of strength - jufa

HUH?
I don't believe Alexander the Great feared death. Although, he sent a lot of people to their graves.
Simply, stating. If you ever played chess. Then, you would understand. The pieces aren't broken, but, merely taken out for good.
The "I" in genius is a metaphor.

ForbidenRea wrote:HUH?
I don't believe Alexander the Great feared death. Although, he sent a lot of people to their graves.
Simply, stating. If you ever played chess. Then, you would understand. The pieces aren't broken, but, merely taken out for good.
The "I" in genius is a metaphor.

How do you know what? A the Great believed ? You know and I know what is believed has no more probative value than what one thinks. I do play chess. It has no more meaning than checkers. Same premise. Complexity does not take away nor add to the premise. The genius is the "I" which constitutes a metaphor because genius cannot be defined on one level only.

Never give power to anything a person believes is their source of strength - jufa

I agree.
The modernist believes it is causation that withdraws him from his belief system. Simply sayin'. It is inevitable to die, but, to die without a cause. I can qoute somebody's lifes endeavors, but, the query or question lies in the hearts of man. And, man is perfect in the fashionable sense that he is no longer a primitive caveman. He is by all means a warrior and a good one at that. Chess. is a game of wits.
I'm simply taking out the X minus in 0, infinitely, and replacing it with the Y. X-Y=causation, without 0. The infinite format by which inherently we all exist in, or, 0-0. The qualitative zero minus the Y's X-Factor.

ForbidenRea wrote:I agree.
The modernist believes it is causation that withdraws him from his belief system. Simply sayin'. It is inevitable to die, but, to die without a cause. I can qoute somebody's lifes endeavors, but, the query or question lies in the hearts of man. And, man is perfect in the fashionable sense that he is no longer a primitive caveman. He is by all means a warrior and a good one at that. Chess. is a game of wits.
I'm simply taking out the X minus in 0, infinitely, and replacing it with the Y. X-Y=causation, without 0. The infinite format by which inherently we all exist in, or, 0-0. The qualitative zero minus the Y's X-Factor.

All living is a game of wit consciously or unconsciously simply by desire to survive. Checkers is a game of wit as chess. To believe chess takes superior wit is subjective to what?

Let's consider the importance of our lives. When there is no one to give life to you ever being an entity, what will your existence, attitude, and beliefs matter? In a hundred years will the reality of your existence exist? In answering this question, does it really matter what you think if you do not leave a legacy, infamous or virtuous, which will give meaning to your life today if you have not done anything to cause people to think, and in thinking, seek to improve upon that which you have left in hope it may lift them up from the earth and expand in their consciousness in that moment?

Let us define the zero in terms of wit by usage of the circle. First, because consciousness needs an object for causation to be an issue, allow me to objectify the xyz factors, as well as zero to be man the metaphor.

The zero [man] is absolute only because the definition of the circle [unknown metaphor] is recognized. His expansion from cave-dweller to rocket man is really of no importance because he still possess an animal mentality. In resuming, it is the definition spoken of above which makes the the void -that which is in the middle, and on the outside of the definition - appear to be the more than the equal of the definition, simply because the definition of the circle gives definition to the void. Where is the perfection to be found since xyz existence depends on the definition of the circle? Being it is the definition which makes the circle the perfection of visibility, because there lies the form, where then is the perfection of the void? Had there been no form, there would be no definition, and all would be void. Perfection would not exist anywhere, that is unless nothingness could be considered. So the reality of the circle is the definition of something because it is the only form there is. This means nothing is moot. And thus reality is comprehended when it is realized the voids [xyz] which surround the outer and inner perimeters of the definition are not divided because they are linked by definition. So then can it be said perfection exist because division is an illusion, or can we say perfection exist as a metaphor? All are one circle because it is the definition of the circle which gives the void within and without their definition of dimensions. Take away the definition of the circle, which is impossible, and there is nothingness. But how can the circle be removed without removing the void, for it is the circle which gives the void form and makes all relative to the definition. So then when perfection is stated to be true, it is true only by relativism?

Never give power to anything a person believes is their source of strength - jufa

Without, sacrifice their'd be no room-for- change.

ForbidenRea wrote:Without, sacrifice their'd be no room-for- change.

Sacrifice for change is effect.

Causation? A change of mind makes room for the sacrifice effect. To alter a situation, circumstance, condition or environ. This initiate the thought to take responsibility to know thyselfno longer conform to the norm, or status quo.

It does not mean one sets out to change the structural platform of society. It mean one is no longer a follower of others the ideas of philosophers, religions, and the they say syndrome. One has taken responsibility. To discover the real Self of themselves and use the knowledge others have presented as pointers.

Most people will not stop beating a dead horse, why? Because they have been indoctrinated from birth to be students of what they say.

Never give power to anything a person believes is their source of strength - jufa

I don't oppose what "is."

ForbidenRea wrote:I don't oppose what "is."

You don't oppose what "is" what?

Never give power to anything a person believes is their source of strength - jufa

There are 78 hundred-trillion megaton watts in the ozone layer.

ForbidenRea wrote:There are 78 hundred-trillion megaton watts in the ozone layer.

Nikola Tesla said as much.

Free electricity for all.

jufa wrote:

ForbidenRea wrote:I agree.
The modernist believes it is causation that withdraws him from his belief system. Simply sayin'. It is inevitable to die, but, to die without a cause. I can qoute somebody's lifes endeavors, but, the query or question lies in the hearts of man. And, man is perfect in the fashionable sense that he is no longer a primitive caveman. He is by all means a warrior and a good one at that. Chess. is a game of wits.
I'm simply taking out the X minus in 0, infinitely, and replacing it with the Y. X-Y=causation, without 0. The infinite format by which inherently we all exist in, or, 0-0. The qualitative zero minus the Y's X-Factor.

All living is a game of wit consciously or unconsciously simply by desire to survive. Checkers is a game of wit as chess. To believe chess takes superior wit is subjective to what?

Let's consider the importance of our lives. When there is no one to give life to you ever being an entity, what will your existence, attitude, and beliefs matter? In a hundred years will the reality of your existence exist? In answering this question, does it really matter what you think if you do not leave a legacy, infamous or virtuous, which will give meaning to your life today if you have not done anything to cause people to think, and in thinking, seek to improve upon that which you have left in hope it may lift them up from the earth and expand in their consciousness in that moment?

Let us define the zero in terms of wit by usage of the circle. First, because consciousness needs an object for causation to be an issue, allow me to objectify the xyz factors, as well as zero to be man the metaphor.

The zero [man] is absolute only because the definition of the circle [unknown metaphor] is recognized. His expansion from cave-dweller to rocket man is really of no importance because he still possess an animal mentality. In resuming, it is the definition spoken of above which makes the the void -that which is in the middle, and on the outside of the definition - appear to be the more than the equal of the definition, simply because the definition of the circle gives definition to the void. Where is the perfection to be found since xyz existence depends on the definition of the circle? Being it is the definition which makes the circle the perfection of visibility, because there lies the form, where then is the perfection of the void? Had there been no form, there would be no definition, and all would be void. Perfection would not exist anywhere, that is unless nothingness could be considered. So the reality of the circle is the definition of something because it is the only form there is. This means nothing is moot. And thus reality is comprehended when it is realized the voids [xyz] which surround the outer and inner perimeters of the definition are not divided because they are linked by definition. So then can it be said perfection exist because division is an illusion, or can we say perfection exist as a metaphor? All are one circle because it is the definition of the circle which gives the void within and without their definition of dimensions. Take away the definition of the circle, which is impossible, and there is nothingness. But how can the circle be removed without removing the void, for it is the circle which gives the void form and makes all relative to the definition. So then when perfection is stated to be true, it is true only by relativism?

Never give power to anything a person believes is their source of strength - jufa

You ever seen a two-headed snake?
They have separate heads and the same entity.

X,Y,Z is the plaintiff.