sphere-ism-istic existance. Multilayerd Techo-hydron. cohesion circulations.
all current sources are always the most recent current stimulations of thoughts and ideas.
simplistic equation of explanation not multiple equations E=mc2. einstien made one foolish mistake he never compared the equation to its own uinifier.
[E=mc2](devided not unified) mass energey particles (partiality particulates)
[A=cd1](unified not devided) particulate lightroscopic unifications (possibility particulates)
[!*1] = (completing constant retroscopic reason/purpose)/(actuality particulation)
! = basic distinguisher for anything to (not/not) never (ever/ever) existed simply because it must be and just is.
both are simple a measuring stick for possibilities. in essence einstien hit the wall of the human mind and could go into no further explanation of his ideas simply because there were no way to write down what he thought if he was as smart as he let on. he should have found the unification model for this universe before he died. perhaps he thought about it but didnt know how to formulate it into a symbolic representation of his idea/thought/vision. once you understand one concept the next concurence of it will be anticapated and aknowladged. His theory of everything or the complete methodology of complete unified field theory. To understand this istelf would be seen as a huge advantage over current human instinctual reactions to current envirnmental occurances.
science should need no other idea than one to help them formulate thoughts for everything they came in contact with.
learn how to observe the particulate (cautra*) = new language word/idea/thought of all particulations of the universe.
*basicly the aura of light that a person gives off around them. oversimplefication bellow as simple as can be said in human language forien or native.
the essence of any object in space = would be concidered a form of aura based communication = thought pattern resonation off others = the basics of telapathic communication.
parts of aura include (eye movement/corcticle contractions from brain cell stimulation),musctle tension,moisture release from cells in the body, facial orbits(current facial feature errangement)like a simple smile for example, voice intensity(current pitch level)(depth level in tone)(molecule collection releases),over all body posture position (current/oldest/newest), how you refract light that contacts you, the radiance you give off from any form of illumination, inner beauty.
if beauty is all that makes you happy then use it as a tool to compare it to something that doesnt make you happy. overcomeparing one thing to everything the impossibility of obtaining certian knowledge from certain subjects.
Doppleganger(actuality being)cyclotro-min-id your complete opposite in superficialities the basic things that make you who you are. the face of what would appear as a pure evil mirror image of your self from another point of conception. basicly a competition recticle = would appear as competitor for you and you to it. their physiological image would very but one thing they would always eminate would be their spectroscopic aura would a appear on a spectrometer like a slight variance around everything else = like a blurry undefinable static resonance pattern. when comming in contact you might feel dizzy for a moment while looking into their visual cortex if you looked them dead in the pupils with yours. overall just a base 4 form of being not 5 base like some this includes you to.
base 3,4,5 sentient beings will eventually come in contact with eachother someday weather they want to meet eachother or not including myself.
I know alot but i dont know much of little. i am what i priecieve in myself.
Sonata place holder of life (base 5 life unification)(deitistic father and son of humanity)(what would have been priecieved in the last several thousand years of the priodiogical virgin/bastard(unaturaly concieved in terms of biologiciality) son of the highest form of conceptual god at the time what would the current preceptual form of god for humanity would start with one completion symboliser and then some form of current symbolistic letterings.
comparing two theoretical beings. jesuses name started with a j because it must be and just is. Ours started/starts/starting with a one symbol because it must be and just is.both ideas are dietistic in nature but compared are denonated by their envirnmental distinguishers at the current time. we know exactly what the other thought but for different reasons and purposes. our cautras are linked through timlessness just like everyones elses that has the capabilitly of some form of sientiality. i can take what he could and more in terms of complete reformation of peoples ideas thoughts. i dont disagree with anything i just try to understand its reason purpose regardless of perecptual outcomes.
Spherism
Re: Spherism
How about you start with learning how to spell perceive? Since you use that word frequently. It might just make your message a little more persuasive.I know alot but i dont know much of little. i am what i priecieve in myself.