quinn:
I think your use of the word "script" to refer to any human action is unwarranted and even rather foolish. For it doesn't distinguish between those who really are following a script - i.e. who are blindly doing what they have been taught by others to do - and those who act independently out of their own wisdom and understanding.
those who act out of their own wisdom and understanding still have a 'script'.
actions are expressions bound up in the belief.
what is there to belief,but in Self?
the subject-object relationship is what can be called the 'as now' and 'as if'* moments of refraction that are within the Self's extrusion as Matter(the experiencing body) refracted through the Mind.
Self itself is conceptless and free,it has to be filled up,cause it acts in accordance with the Mind,the atmospheric 'I',vision,etc.
when in time-space,its experience is within the Matter(the experiencing body),the experience is in alliance with the ego and the Id.this interplay puts itself forth as a symbolic "rehearsel of reality",a mock reality.
therefore Schiller stated:
"in error only is there life,and knowledge must be death".
*:those who want to know more about the 'as if',read Vaihinger's book "The philosophy of 'as if'",the basis lies therein that we have no direct experience of the actual world.
he has the theory of the useful fiction which state:"The 'as if' world...the world of the 'unreal' is just as real and important as the real or actual.
another example:"The German philosopher Vaihinger had a term for beliefs that we know are not true but still come in handy: he called them useful fictions. That was his great philosophy of AS IF: you act AS IF something were true if it's beneficial to you. Now I'm not a philosopher, but I keep one handy around the house to answer questions about the meaning of life (no home should be without one).
another example:"Another major influence on [Alfred] Adler's thinking was the philosopher Hans Vaihinger, who wrote a book called The Philosophy of "As If." Vaihinger believed that ultimate truth would always be beyond us, but that, for practical purposes, we need to create partial truths.
another great thinker was Jeremy bentham:"Another thinker who took up the notion of conceptual construction and produced a truly remarkable compendium of detailed analyses was Jeremy Bentham. He developed his Theory of Fictions between 1760 (when he entered Oxford at the age of twelve and a half!) and 1814, when he published his first systematic exposition. He concluded: 'To language, then - to language alone - it is that fictitious entities owe their existence; their impossible, yet indispensable existence.'(4)
