The Heart

Discussion of the nature of Ultimate Reality and the path to Enlightenment.
User avatar
Kelly Jones
Posts: 2665
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 3:51 pm
Location: Australia
Contact:

Post by Kelly Jones »

Tharpa,

tharpa wrote:it is interesting that in a thread on heart, one of your main examples is a stick = stick, A = A.
Once again, for the benefit of the extremely patient reader, heart as i have been using it in this entire thread means the core truth of all things.

Regarding the stick, it was an attempt using humour to see whether you'd identify something (A=A, an absolute truth) without an emotional reaction (false heart). But you didn't.

You may, however, be familiar with a Zen koan that goes something like this:

A wandering nobody, perhaps a monk, visited a Zen master.

The teacher asked the monk, "Where have you come from?" The monk said, "Oh, the Bodhidharma temple up in the Daoist Mountains".

The teacher wondered at this reply. Then he asked, "And what is your name?" The monk replied instantly and without thinking, "Bob".

At this, the teacher frowned a bit, then asked, "And what are you doing here?" To this third question, the monk breezily answered, "Attending a lecture and doing a bit of Zazen meditation."

To this third thoughtless answer, the teacher replied, "I should give you a good three whacks in the head with a stick, for those answers. But i won't. Dismissed." Bob the monk, bewildered, went away.

The next morning, he came back to see the Zen master. He said, "Yesterday you said you should have whacked me in the head a few times. I don't understand. What did i do wrong?"

The teacher replied, "You're a good-for-nothing monk. You're way south of the lake."

Hearing of this story retold by another Zen teacher, another monk said, "That Zen master should have given him those good, hard whacks in the head with his stick!"

The Zen master, hearing this, replied, "When you hear stick, your head is full of "whack someone with it". You idiot. Don't you see that Bob the monk was so far removed from any idea of the truth that he wouldn't have known that a whack meant "No, wrong" ? So, the teacher could only say, "You're way off course," and leave it at that.





A mother's love for her child is an example of a heartfelt truth. Of course, it can go all over the map in terms of being sane/neurotic etc., but as long as you want to use the english language, and no matter how many trips are taken to a public dictionary on the web, heart does not equal logic, and indeed often means something quite different, either in mundane or esoteric vocabularies.
I've never defined heart to mean logic, tharpa, at least not in this thread. Don't think i ever have.

I've always been using heart to mean core. As in essence.



On the one hand you say the tradition that distinguishes between absolute and relative is all bullshit,
I did not say this. I said the tradition that says the core truth of all things (heart of wisdom) is emotion-based is bullshit.


and then you say you are interesting in discussing only the absolute aspect.
A core truth of all things is true absolutely. So it is logical to discuss the absolute.



Except that the absolute aspect is understandable only in the context of understanding relative as well, i.e. the background that allows the relative to arise. On its own, it has no meaning whatsoever.
There is no background for absolutely everything. That is illogical. A background would have to be included in "everything".



In your description of developing wisdom, many of the tactics involved dealing with emotionality.
The thread "Dealing with emotions" is full of well-reasoned ideas. At no time is emotion used irrationally. In my post to Carl, above, i mentioned that love for wisdom is discarded when there are no competing loves.

When there is an unhelpful addiction, i wrote, trading it for a helpful one is useful. This is an utterly logical, rather than emotional, idea.



In my opinion, emotions are what we feel (and not necessarily the same as 'feelings') as the living expression of mind/body inter-relationship. All emotions have physical 'energies', i.e. we feel them especially somewhere (or many places). So the territorial situation we find ourselves in as individuated (relative) being in an overall (absolute) continuum involves a certain charge, or energy, and the style of territory we maintain is experienced as 'emotion', both in mind and body.
If you posit energies as being everything that can possibly be experienced, then you are reasoning that the identity of absolutely everything is "energies". So it is only by reasoning that "energies" has existence.

Since everything you identify exactly is reasoned to be itself, then everything that can possibly be experienced is the reasoning mind.



Heart involves feeling both self-based-territorial consciousness as well as the broader context of other selves and beyond selfhood altogether.
If you are saying that

Absolutely Everything = "self-based-territorial consciousness" + "broader context of other selfs and beyond selfhood altogether"

then

you have defined the Absolute. If this definition is logical, then nothing else can possibly exist.

It looks to me like "selfs + everything that isn't a self". That sounds reasonable to me.

The only suspicious part to your statement is that you claim that the Totality of all things (which you call Heart) is felt. I dispute this, because one cannot experience the Totality as a thing, at all.



Or put another way: if all is logic, who is logicking and what is the motivation?
The logical answer is logic. You did say, "if all is logic".



.
tharpa
Posts: 203
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 4:10 pm
Location: Canada

Post by tharpa »

Fine, since you started the thread - with a poem I cited in another thread about compassion etc. - about heart, but have defined it as pure logic, I have nothing to contribute. The vocabulary makes no sense to me and obviously much of what I say makes no sense to you, i.e. that emotions are the basis of absolute truth etc., something which I would never even dream of thinking. I was talking about heart in relation to wisdom, but the words have such different meaning for both of us that there isn't really a conversation.

You have defined heart above as essentially the same as logic. To such a theme I have nothing to contribute.
User avatar
Kelly Jones
Posts: 2665
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 3:51 pm
Location: Australia
Contact:

Post by Kelly Jones »

Alright. I think i've given you too much information. I haven't had any problem at all understanding you, though.

Let's keep it really really simple.

Call a thing A.

Call anything A.

Wherever you look, that is A.

What is true for absolutely everything? A.

This is an introduction to the idea of heart.

The heart is not logic. But understanding the heart requires logic. Logic is just A=A.



tharpa wrote:that emotions are the basis of absolute truth etc., something which I would never even dream of thinking.
Don't you remember saying that wisdom is about feeling, warmth, emotion? Do you not think that wisdom has to be based on what is absolutely true?


You have defined heart above as essentially the same as logic. To such a theme I have nothing to contribute.
For the second time, i have not, and do not.

Logic is just "a thing is what it is". If you call this something else, go for it. But without this, there is no truth.


.
User avatar
Kelly Jones
Posts: 2665
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 3:51 pm
Location: Australia
Contact:

Post by Kelly Jones »

Tharpa wrote:

tharpa wrote:A mother's love for her child is an example of a heartfelt truth. Of course, it can go all over the map in terms of being sane/neurotic etc., but as long as you want to use the english language, and no matter how many trips are taken to a public dictionary on the web, heart does not equal logic, and indeed often means something quite different, either in mundane or esoteric vocabularies.

Kelly: I've never defined heart to mean logic, tharpa, at least not in this thread. Don't think i ever have.

I've always been using heart to mean core. As in essence.
Core, and essence, are two standard definitions for "heart":

(Remembering that i'm talking about the core truth of all things.....)

20 different definitions for: heart from dictionary.com:
dictionary.com wrote:–noun
1. Anatomy. a hollow, pumplike organ of blood circulation, composed mainly of rhythmically contractile smooth muscle, located in the chest between the lungs and slightly to the left and consisting of four chambers: a right atrium that receives blood returning from the body via the superior and inferior vena cavae, a right ventricle that pumps the blood through the pulmonary artery to the lungs for oxygenation, a left atrium that receives the oxygenated blood via the pulmonary veins and passes it through the mitral valve, and a left ventricle that pumps the oxygenated blood, via the aorta, throughout the body.
2. Zoology.
a. the homologous structure in other vertebrates, consisting of four chambers in mammals and birds and three chambers in reptiles and amphibians.
b. the analogous contractile structure in invertebrate animals, as the tubular heart of the spider and earthworm.
3. the center of the total personality, esp. with reference to intuition, feeling, or emotion: In your heart you know I'm an honest man.
4. the center of emotion, esp. as contrasted to the head as the center of the intellect: His head told him not to fall in love, but his heart had the final say.
5. capacity for sympathy; feeling; affection: His heart moved him to help the needy.
6. spirit, courage, or enthusiasm: His heart sank when he walked into the room and saw their gloomy faces.
7. the innermost or central part of anything: Notre Dame stands in the very heart of Paris.
8. the vital or essential part; core: the heart of the matter.

9. the breast or bosom: to clasp a person to one's heart.
10. a person (used esp. in expressions of praise or affection): dear heart.
11. a conventional shape with rounded sides meeting in a point at the bottom and curving inward to a cusp at the top.
12. a red figure or pip of this shape on a playing card.
13. a card of the suit bearing such figures.
14. hearts,
a. (used with a singular or plural verb) the suit so marked: Hearts is trump. Hearts are trump.
b. (used with a singular verb) a game in which the players try to avoid taking tricks containing this suit.
15. Botany. the core of a tree; the solid central part without sap or albumen.
16. good condition for production, growth, etc., as of land or crops.
17. Also called core. Ropemaking. a strand running through the center of a rope, the other strands being laid around it.


Now, here's a definition of heart to start the day with!

Taking the form of a rather acidic comment by the Zen master, Hakuin, on The Heart Sutra:
HEART

For untold ages this didn't have a name. Then they blundered and gave it one. A speck of gold in the eye shadows vision; robes and beads are just another blemish on the Dharma. What is THIS! Most people only think they have the real thing, like the fellow who confused a saddle-remnant for his father's jawbone. Those who study the Way are unaware of its reality -- simply because from the outset they have accepted all their discriminations as being true. Those have been the very source of birth-and-death since the beginning of time, yet the fools take them to be the fundamental, essential Self.

It's clearly ungettable within the Three Worlds*—
An empty sky swept clean away. Not a particle left.
On the zazen seat, in the dead of night, cold as steel;
Moonlight through a window, bright with shadows of plum!

* The worlds of the past, present and future.

Here's a shorter translation of Hakuin's comment on the "Heart" of "The Heart of Perfect Wisdom Sutra":
(The) Heart (Mind)

For untold ages this didn't have a name. Then they blundered and gave it one. When it flies into your eyes, even gold dust will blind you.



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


I wonder what's stopping it from flying into your eyes.

Perhaps many close and intimate relationships, that are very precious to you?

Girlfriend? Pets? Family?

.
Steven Coyle

Post by Steven Coyle »

Kelly,

Does Hakuin's description of "Heart" describe the Void of Huang Po?
User avatar
Kelly Jones
Posts: 2665
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 3:51 pm
Location: Australia
Contact:

Post by Kelly Jones »

The Zen Teachings of Huang Po (from David's website):

All the Buddhas and all sentient beings are nothing but the One Mind, beside which nothing exists. This Mind, which is without beginning is unborn and indestructible. It is not green nor yellow, and has neither form nor appearance. It does not belong in the categories of things which exist or do not exist, nor can it be thought of in terms of new or old. It is neither long nor short, big nor small, for it transcends all limits, measures, names, traces and comparisons. It is that which you see before you - begin to reason about it and you at once fall into error. It is like the boundless void which cannot be fathomed or measured.

***

If you are not absolutely convinced that the Mind is the Buddha, and if you are attached to forms, practices and meritorious performances, your way of thinking is false and quite incompatible with the Way. The Mind is the Buddha, nor are there any other Buddhas or any other mind. It is bright and spotless as the void, having nor form or appearance whatsoever. To make use of your minds to think conceptually is to leave the substance and attach yourselves to form. Awake only to the One Mind, and there is nothing whatsoever to be attained.

If you students of the Way do not awaken to this Mind substance, you will overlay Mind with conceptual thought, you will seek the Buddha outside of yourselves, and you will remain attached to forms, pious practices and so on, all of which are harmful and not at all the way to supreme knowledge.

***

The substance of the Absolute is inwardly like wood or stone, in that it is motionless, and outwardly like the void, in that it is without bounds or obstructions. It is neither subjective nor objective, has no specific location, is formless, and cannot vanish. Those who hasten towards it dare not enter, fearing to hurtle down through the void with nothing to cling to or stay their fall. So they look to the brink and retreat.

***

All the qualities typified by the great Bodhisattvas are inherent in men and cannot be separated from the One Mind. Awake to it, and it is there. You students of the Way who do not awake to this in your own minds, and who are attached to appearances or who seek for something objective outside of your minds, have all turned your backs on the Way.

This Dharma is Mind, beyond which there is no Dharma. And this Mind is the Dharma, beyond which there is no mind. Mind in itself is no mind, yet neither is it no-mind. To say that Mind is no-mind implies something existent. Let there be a silent understanding and no more. Away with all thinking and explaining! Then we may say that the Way of Words has been cut off and movements of the mind eliminated.

***

Our original Buddha-Nature is, in highest truth, devoid of any atom of objectivity. It is void, omnipresent, silent, pure; it is glorious and mysterious peaceful joy - and that is all. Enter deeply into it by awakening to it yourself. That which is before you is it, in all its fullness, utterly complete. There is naught beside. Even if you go through all the stages of a Bodhisattva's progress towards Buddhahood, one by one; when at last, in a single flash, you attain to full realization, you will only be realizing the Buddha-Nature which has been with you all the time; and by the foregoing stages you will have added nothing to it at all. You will come to look upon those aeons of work and achievement as no better than unreal actions performed in a dream.

This is why the Tathagata said, "I truly attained nothing from complete, unexcelled enlightenment." He also said: "This Dharma is absolutely without distinctions, neither high nor low, and its name is Bodhi." It is pure Mind, which is the source of everything and which, whether appearing as sentient beings or Buddhas, or as the rivers and mountains of the world which has form, or as that which is formless, or penetrating the whole universe, is absolutely without distinctions, there being no such entities as selfness and otherness.

***

This pure Mind, the source of everything, shines forever and on all with the brilliance of its own perfection. But the people of this world do not awake to it, regarding only that which sees, hears feels and knows as mind. Blinded by their own sight, hearing, feeling and knowing, they do not perceive the spiritual brilliance of the source-substance. If they would only eliminate all conceptual thought in a flash, that source-substance would manifest itself like the sun ascending through the void and illuminating the whole universe without hindrance or bounds.

Therefore, if you students of the way seek to progress through seeing, hearing, feeling and knowing, when you are deprived of your perceptions your way to Mind will be cut off and you will find nowhere to enter. Only realize that, though real Mind is expressed in these perceptions, it neither forms part of them, nor is separate from them. You should not start reasoning from these perceptions, nor allow them to give rise to conceptual thought; yet nor should you seek the One Mind apart from them or abandon them in your pursuit of the Dharma. Do not keep them, nor abandon them, nor dwell in them, nor cleave to them. Above, below and around you, all is spontaneously existing, for there is nowhere which is outside the Buddha-Mind.

***

Suppose a warrior, forgetting he was already wearing his pearl on his forehead, were to seek for it elsewhere, he could travel the whole world without finding it. But if someone who knew what was wrong were to point it out to him, the warrior would immediately realize that the pearl had been there all the time.

So, if you students of the Way are mistaken about your own real Mind, not recognizing that it is the Buddha, you will consequently look for him elsewhere, indulging in various achievements and practices and expecting to attain realization through such graduated practices. But even after aeons of diligent searching, you will not be able to attain the Way. These methods cannot be compared to the sudden elimination of conceptual thought, in the certain knowledge that there is nothing at all which has absolute existence, nothing on which to lay hold, nothing on which to rely, nothing in which to abide, nothing subjective or objective.

***

To awaken suddenly to the fact that your own Mind is the Buddha, that there is nothing to be attained or a single action to be performed - this is the Supreme Way; this really is to be a Buddha. It is only to be feared that you students of the Way, by the coming into existence of a single thought, may raise a barrier between yourselves and the Way. From thought-instant to thought-instant, no form; from thought-instant to thought-instant, no activity - that is to be a Buddha! If you students of the Way wish to become Buddhas, you need study no doctrines whatever, but learn only how to avoid seeking for and attaching yourselves to anything. Where nothing is sought, this implies Mind unborn; where no attachment exists, this implies Mind not destroyed; and that which is neither born nor destroyed is the Buddha.

The eighty-four thousand methods for countering the eighty-four thousand forms of delusion are merely figures of speech for drawing people towards the Gate. In fact, none of them have real existence. Relinquishment of everything is the Dharma, and he who understands this is a Buddha, but the relinquishment of ALL delusions leaves no Dharma in which to lay hold.

***

Understand the one point, and a thousand others will accordingly grow clear; misunderstand that one and ten thousand delusions will encompass you. He who holds to that one has no more problems to solve.

***

Ordinary people look to their surroundings, while follower of the Way look to Mind, but the true Dharma is to forget them both. The former is easy enough, the latter very difficult. Men are afraid to forget their minds, fearing to fall through the Void with nothing to stay their fall. They do not know that the Void is not really void, but the realm of the real Dharma. This spiritually enlightening nature is without beginning, as ancient as the Void, subject to neither birth nor destruction, neither existing nor not existing; neither pure nor impure, neither clamorous nor silent, neither old nor young, occupying no space, having neither inside nor outside, size nor form, colour nor sound. It cannot be looked for or sought, comprehended by wisdom nor knowledge, explained in words, contacted materially or reached by meritorious achievement. All the Buddhas and Bodhisattvas, together with all wriggling things possessed of life, share in this great Nirvanic nature.

***

"Studying the Way" is a figure of speech. It is a method of arousing peoples interest is the early stages of their development. In fact, the Way is not something that can be studied. Study leads to the retention of concepts and so the Way is entirely misunderstood. The fruit of Truth is gained by putting an end to all anxiety; it does not come from book-learning.

***

All great men have abandoned learning and have come to rest in spontaneity. They do not think and end in perplexity as do worldly men.

***

If the meaning is not brilliantly clear to you, hasten to ask your questions. Do not allow hours to pass you in vain. If you people put your trust in this teaching and act accordingly, without being delivered, I shall gladly take your places in hell for the whole of my existence. If I have deceived you, may I be reborn in a place where lions, tigers and wolves will devour my flesh! But, if you do not put faith in this teaching, and do not practice it diligently, that will be because you do not understand it. Once you have lost a human body, you will not obtain another for millions of aeons. Strive on! Strive on! It is absolutely vital that you come to understand.

***

Zen Masters grasp at essentials and gain a direct understanding of the Mind Source. Their methods consist of revealing and hiding, of exposing and covering reality in a criss-cross manner which responds adequately to all the different grades of potentiality for enlightenment. They excel in harmonizing facts with the underlying principle, so that people may suddenly perceive the Tathagata; and by pulling up their deep samsaric roots, they cause their pupils to experience samadhi on the spot.

***

That which is called the City of Illusions contains the Two Vehicles, the Ten Stages of a Bodhisattva's Progress, and two forms of Full Enlightenment. All of them are powerful teachings for arousing people's interest, but they still belong to the City of Illusions. That which is called the Place of Precious Things is the real Mind, the original Buddha-essence, the treasure of our own real Nature. These jewels cannot be measured or accumulated. Yet since there are neither Buddha nor sentient beings, neither subject nor object, where can there be a Place of Precious Things? If you ask, "Well, so much for the City of Illusions, but where is the Place of Precious Things?", it is a place to which no directions can be given. For if it could be pointed out, it would be a place existing in space; hence, it would not be the real Place of Precious Things. All we can say is that it is close by. It cannot be exactly described, but when you have a tacit understanding of it, it is there.

***

People are often hindered by environmental phenomena from perceiving Mind, and by individual events from perceiving underlying principles; so they often try to escape from environmental phenomena in order to still their minds, or obscure events in order to retain their grasp of principles. They do not realize that this is merely to obscure phenomena with Mind, events with principles. Just let your minds become void and environmental phenomena will void themselves; let principles cease to stir and events will cease stirring of themselves.

Many people are afraid to empty their minds lest they plunge into the Void. They do not know that their own Mind is the void. The ignorant eschew phenomena but not thought; the wise eschew thought but not phenomena. When everything inside and outside, bodily and mental, has been relinquished; when, as in the Void, no attachments are left; when all action is dictated purely by place and circumstance; when subjectivity and objectivity are forgotten - that is the highest form of relinquishment.

***

The way is spiritual Truth and was originally without name or title. It was only because people ignorantly sought for it empirically that the Buddhas appeared and taught them to eradicate this method of approach. Fearing that nobody would understand, they selected the name "Way". You must not allow this name to lead you into forming a mental concept of a road. So it is said, "When the fish is caught we pay no more attention to the trap". When body and mind achieve spontaneity, the Way is reached and Mind is understood.

If you would spend all your time - walking, standing, sitting or lying down - learning to halt the concept-forming activities of your own mind, you could be sure of ultimately attaining your goal. Since your strength is insufficient, you might not be able to transcend samsara in a single leap; but after five or ten years, you would surely have made a good beginning and be able to make further progress spontaneously. It is because you are not that sort of man that you feel obliged to employ your mind studying the Way". What has all that got to do with Buddhism?

So, just discard all you have acquired as being no better than a bedspread for you when you were sick. Only when you have abandoned all perceptions, there being nothing objective to perceive; only when phenomena obstruct you no longer; only when you have rid yourself of the whole gamut of dualistic concepts of the" ignorant" and" Enlightened" category, will you at last earn the title of Transcendental Buddha.


Yes, what Hakuin means by the heart of wisdom is the same as what Huang Po means by the Void (with a capital V).


.
Last edited by Kelly Jones on Mon Jan 15, 2007 8:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
Steven Coyle

Post by Steven Coyle »

... Your recent posts have been a great help.
User avatar
Kelly Jones
Posts: 2665
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 3:51 pm
Location: Australia
Contact:

Post by Kelly Jones »

Steven Coyle wrote:... Your recent posts have been a great help.
So has David's, Dan's, and Kevin's websites been. Full of free, and easily accessible scriptures.

Imagine: Free! Don't have to pay a cent for them.


.
Steven Coyle

Post by Steven Coyle »

Right on

:)
User avatar
Kelly Jones
Posts: 2665
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 3:51 pm
Location: Australia
Contact:

Post by Kelly Jones »

A technical question related to my next-to-previous post's opening URL (which i changed from the below URL to a higher subdirectory):

The BBCode robot doesn't recognise any URL with a space in its path, such as between subdirectories.

For example: http://www.members.optushome.com.au/dav ... 0/Buddhist Writings/HuangPo.htm
has a blank space between "Buddhist" and "Writings"

DOS uses inverted commas, and Linux terminals use underscores, as far as i know, to overcome this issue of keeping a path with inserted spaces together. BBCode doesn't use this. So, how should the above URL be posted?
Elizabeth Isabelle
Posts: 3771
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 11:35 am

Post by Elizabeth Isabelle »

Buddhist Writings



Quote the above, and you will see how it is done.
User avatar
Kelly Jones
Posts: 2665
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 3:51 pm
Location: Australia
Contact:

Post by Kelly Jones »

Thanks.

Elizabeth's quote indicates that a space needs to be rendered with "%20" (without the inverted commas).
Locked