To be? or, maybe, to be again...

Discussion of the nature of Ultimate Reality and the path to Enlightenment.
Locked
HYPNOSIS

To be? or, maybe, to be again...

Post by HYPNOSIS »

I've never read a book on shakespear but the profoundness of it comes like a comic coming out of a comic book. I did this post to see how good people would be(stop persecuting me!) I have written dozens of posts and now find myself equal to the crowd of stupid geniuses. I have no air. My past=my present.

Stupid.

Really.
User avatar
Dan Rowden
Posts: 5740
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 8:03 pm
Contact:

Re: To be? or, maybe, to be again...

Post by Dan Rowden »

Agreed.
HYPNOSIS

Re: To be? or, maybe, to be again...

Post by HYPNOSIS »

Dan Rowden wrote:Agreed.
Agreed to what?..

Celestial beings? Fight club? Are there any standards provoking life? What is agreed upon is the legitimate sentence that I wrote on the topics of freeing yourself from yourself, then, falling into "Agreed" would be like flying a kit on a windy day. Yet. That holds more emotion than when you are something eternal? And, what is eternal? Me? I support that fact. What is the beginnings of an ending? How come the reality of realities cannot be just a simple dosage of outer grasps? How can we all be equal to an enlightened self when all's that we have are the stupid tuvey's governing the borders between self realization and a realitivly long statement of juxtapose?

So, should I make my mark by selling my soul? Should I tell self, " Self you are vague." Should times of great depression cause me to welcome myself into the epitemy of self-loathing? Are not the basics of naturality in the uniqueness of time? Should I ponder A=A till I'm blue in the face? What is A=A? How does it work?

Fuck!..
User avatar
Dan Rowden
Posts: 5740
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 8:03 pm
Contact:

Re: To be? or, maybe, to be again...

Post by Dan Rowden »

HYPNOSIS wrote:
Dan Rowden wrote:Agreed.
Agreed to what?..
I don't know, because I don't really know what you said. I was being agreeable for ironic effect.
Elizabeth Isabelle
Posts: 3771
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 11:35 am

Re: To be? or, maybe, to be again...

Post by Elizabeth Isabelle »

I'm wondering if it is time to reopen worldly matters.
User avatar
sue hindmarsh
Posts: 1083
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2005 9:02 am
Location: Sous Le Soleil

Re: To be? or, maybe, to be again...

Post by sue hindmarsh »

No, it should remain closed in order to maintain the press for higher standards.

People like HYP are bound to wander through, but they never stay long for they find the "air" here unbreathable.
HYPNOSIS: I have no air.
HYPNOSIS

Re: To be? or, maybe, to be again...

Post by HYPNOSIS »

Sue Hindmarsh wrote:No, it should remain closed in order to maintain the press for higher standards.

People like HYP are bound to wander through, but they never stay long for they find the "air" here unbreathable.
HYPNOSIS: I have no air.
Sorry, Sue. =(

I haven't showered in 2 days because buddha is in my room teaching me the ways of the ninja!
Elizabeth Isabelle
Posts: 3771
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 11:35 am

Re: To be? or, maybe, to be again...

Post by Elizabeth Isabelle »

Sue Hindmarsh wrote:No, it should remain closed in order to maintain the press for higher standards.
My implied suggestion was that not only is there slippage of said "standards" - not just in this post - but since administration is starting to participate rather than rebuke, at least we can clean up the main forum?
HYPNOSIS

Re: To be? or, maybe, to be again...

Post by HYPNOSIS »

Elizabeth Isabelle wrote:
Sue Hindmarsh wrote:No, it should remain closed in order to maintain the press for higher standards.
My implied suggestion was that not only is there slippage of said "standards" - not just in this post - but since administration is starting to participate rather than rebuke, at least we can clean up the main forum?
[You practice what you preach]=)
Elizabeth Isabelle
Posts: 3771
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 11:35 am

Re: To be? or, maybe, to be again...

Post by Elizabeth Isabelle »

Hey, if they want a mess in the main forum, party on dude.
Think
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 5:42 pm

Re: To be? or, maybe, to be again...

Post by Think »

Dan Rowden wrote:
HYPNOSIS wrote:
Dan Rowden wrote:Agreed.
Agreed to what?..
I don't know, because I don't really know what you said. I was being agreeable for ironic effect.
i agree, that ironic effect was suitable for the moment at hand
profoundlygenius
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 6:11 pm

Re: To be? or, maybe, to be again...

Post by profoundlygenius »

everyones stupid everyones brilliant, take a trip on the LSD man, yaaaaa thats the way to ride it, nice and slow baby!

I like it!
Locked