Jufa:
How can things be if they are not? And being they are not, what can they be interdependent dependent to that also is not?
.... no im not saying that a thing IS while saying there is no thing...
I'm saying a thing
is because of 'that' which it isn't. Meaning that thing, and non-thing, both depend on eachother for their thing-ness, or boundedness, this means, that all things are not 'just' things, but an expression of the rest of reality which we also call non-thing.
Reality is, things never really are. Things do appear, but they are not 'just' the thing, they are Reality. The reason we belief in the death and life of things is because we are first mistaken in 'things', we might die, but we are just Reality moving on its way.