Ghosts

kowtaaia · Post by **kowtaaia** » Wed Nov 08, 2006 3:10 am

There is nothing helpful nor instructive about mental illness at all.

Wow!

kowtaaia · Post by **kowtaaia** » Wed Nov 08, 2006 3:17 am

Rory,

Sorry for the lack of words. There's alot of feeling, though.

kowtaaia · Post by **kowtaaia** » Wed Nov 08, 2006 4:22 am

No, you were not hallucinating! :)

Rory · Post by **Rory** » Wed Nov 08, 2006 4:43 am

kowtaaia wrote:No, you were not hallucinating! :)

Uh. What?

kowtaaia · Post by **kowtaaia** » Wed Nov 08, 2006 5:08 am

Rory wrote:
kowtaaia wrote:No, you were not hallucinating! :)
Uh. What?

Cory, Rory! :)

sschaula · Post by **sschaula** » Wed Nov 08, 2006 5:14 am

What a moron.

kowtaaia · Post by **kowtaaia** » Wed Nov 08, 2006 5:18 am

sschaula wrote:What a moron.

You don't know what the comment pertained to, you idiot! Do you and your gang of cretins have to fuck up every thread with your anal retentive stupidity?

Elizabeth Isabelle · Post by **Elizabeth Isabelle** » Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:12 am

Scott -

kow originally typed

Cory,

Sorry for the lack of words. There's alot of feeling, though.

She the edited "Cory" to say "Rory" (I guess she's so obsessed with Cory that she couldn't even type straight), and rather than making a notation of her edit, she used her standard illogical, misleading use of language to just add to the confusion. The then followed up her irrational behavior with a hissy fit. I agree that her behavior was moronic.

kowtaaia · Post by **kowtaaia** » Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:47 am

It's no wonder that the other lady refered to you as a cunt pretending not to be cunt.

sue hindmarsh · Post by **sue hindmarsh** » Wed Nov 08, 2006 8:49 am

kowtaaia wrote:

sschaula: What a moron.

You don't know what the comment pertained to, you idiot! Do you and your gang of cretins have to fuck up every thread with your anal retentive stupidity?

Your contribution to this forum has so far been only as an agitator. You do not enter into discussions with the intent of getting at the heart of subjects â€“ you only wish to disrupt. This forum is here to assist the development of posters ideas about life â€“ so if you have any ideas, post them â€“ if not, cease causing disruption.

-
Sue

kowtaaia · Post by **kowtaaia** » Wed Nov 08, 2006 9:30 am

Just because you and a few other pseudo philosophers get upset when a newcomcomer doesn't put up with your bullshit and shows you a mirror where you have to look at your own stupidities: doesn't mean that they are agitators. How dare you lowbrows pretend to teach! There's another thread (GENIUS FORUM) that begins with a profoundly stupid statement that you made. Try to respond without fallacious arguments.

Elizabeth Isabelle · Post by **Elizabeth Isabelle** » Wed Nov 08, 2006 9:36 am

kowtaaia wrote:Just because you and a few other pseudo philosophers get upset when a newcomcomer doesn't put up with your bullshit and shows you a mirror where you have to look at your own stupidities: doesn't mean that they are agitators. How dare you lowbrows pretend to teach! There's another thread (GENIUS FORUM) that begins with a profoundly stupid statement that you made. Try to respond without fallacious arguments.

Sue wrote:

Your contribution to this forum has so far been only as an agitator. You do not enter into discussions with the intent of getting at the heart of subjects â€“ you only wish to disrupt. This forum is here to assist the development of posters ideas about life

Sue did not make any fallicious arguments here. This is all quite accurate.

Elizabeth Isabelle · Post by **Elizabeth Isabelle** » Wed Nov 08, 2006 9:38 am

kowtaaia wrote:Just because you and a few other pseudo philosophers get upset when a newcomcomer doesn't put up with your bullshit

We're working on rationality here. Do you find rationality to be "bullshit" ?

kowtaaia · Post by **kowtaaia** » Wed Nov 08, 2006 9:40 am

You're as dumb as a doorknob! There's just no point.

Dan Rowden · Post by **Dan Rowden** » Wed Nov 08, 2006 10:12 am

Kow, it is time you started limiting your posts to actual discussion of issues. And it's also time that Scott got a grip on his dislike for you.

I don't have limitless patience.

Dan Rowden

sue hindmarsh · Post by **sue hindmarsh** » Wed Nov 08, 2006 10:15 am

Kowtaaia wrote:

You're as dumb as a doorknob! There's just no point.

This is where you are very much mistaken. There is â€˜a pointâ€™, and it just so happens that many posters here value it greatly â€“ and that is truth. By valuing truth, the posters here are dedicated to rooting out of their minds all falsehoods. They do this by exposing their thoughts to others in the desire to make new discoveries about concepts, which they hope will then lead them, ever closer, to understanding the Ultimate Wisdom.

-
Sue

kowtaaia · Post by **kowtaaia** » Wed Nov 08, 2006 10:19 am

Dan Rowden wrote:Kow, it is time you started limiting your posts to actual discussion of issues. And it's also time that Scott got a grip on his dislike for you.

I don't have limitless patience.

Dan Rowden

It would be wonderful to be able to discuss things without these endless ad-hominem attacks. Responses are always specific to the posts that they are replies to.

Dan Rowden · Post by **Dan Rowden** » Wed Nov 08, 2006 10:26 am

Give me a break. You're the most abusive person here at the moment. You might want to try leading by example.

Elizabeth Isabelle · Post by **Elizabeth Isabelle** » Wed Nov 08, 2006 10:27 am

kowtaaia wrote: It would be wonderful to be able to discuss things without these endless ad-hominem attacks. Responses are always specific to the posts that they are replies to.

kowtaaia wrote:You're as dumb as a doorknob! There's just no point.

That is neither specific to a point, nor very clear who or how many of us you were calling "dumb as a doorknob." Furthermore, if someone here (other than you) was dumb as a doorknob, that would be an ad-hominem, as the points have been intelligent.

kowtaaia · Post by **kowtaaia** » Wed Nov 08, 2006 10:31 am

Sue Hindmarsh wrote:Kowtaaia wrote:

You're as dumb as a doorknob! There's just no point.
This is where you are very much mistaken. There is â€˜a pointâ€™, and it just so happens that many posters here value it greatly â€“ and that is truth. By valuing truth, the posters here are dedicated to rooting out of their minds all falsehoods. They do this by exposing their thoughts to others in the desire to make new discoveries about concepts, which they hope will then lead them, ever closer, to understanding the Ultimate Wisdom.

-
Sue

It was a response to this.

Elizabeth Isabelle wrote: We're working on rationality here. Do you find rationality to be "bullshit" ?

Lizzy knew full well that the "bullshit" comment did not pertain to rationality.

As to your last sentence: Wonderful! Understanding does not come about by eating someones abuse. Is it really neccessary to drag up what originally happened when kow asked about the use of ad hominems on this forum?

kowtaaia · Post by **kowtaaia** » Wed Nov 08, 2006 10:33 am

Dan Rowden wrote:Give me a break. You're the most abusive person here at the moment. You might want to try leading by example.

That's bullshit and you know it. It's not a one on one thing. It's a gang on one, thing.

kowtaaia · Post by **kowtaaia** » Wed Nov 08, 2006 10:35 am

Elizabeth Isabelle wrote:
kowtaaia wrote: It would be wonderful to be able to discuss things without these endless ad-hominem attacks. Responses are always specific to the posts that they are replies to.

kowtaaia wrote:You're as dumb as a doorknob! There's just no point.
That is neither specific to a point, nor very clear who or how many of us you were calling "dumb as a doorknob." Furthermore, if someone here (other than you) was dumb as a doorknob, that would be an ad-hominem, as the points have been intelligent.

Read the response to Sue.

Dan Rowden · Post by **Dan Rowden** » Wed Nov 08, 2006 10:38 am

Kow,

You might want to avoid trying to tell me what I know. It's not gang on one thing at all. You sound very much like someone from The Big View. You have attacked people for their supposed stupidity left, right an centre. Every now and then it might be appropriate, but I think by now people have gotten the point.

There are better ways of correcting a perceived error in thought. And I direct that point at everyone here.

Elizabeth Isabelle · Post by **Elizabeth Isabelle** » Wed Nov 08, 2006 10:43 am

My reference to ad-hominems was from the quote I quoted from you from only a few minutes before.
What I find to be "bullshit" or what some have referred to as "kowshit" is your pointless namecalling, derailing of threads, hijacking of threads with innane questions, and general irrational behavior.

This I will bring up from when you first got here (less than a week ago, despite your approaching 200 posts). I did used to point out specifics of your irrationality in hopes that you would learn what looked irrational. Even though there are thousands of examples here of how to do a rational argument, I outlined the procedure for you, and even coached you you on how to make one of your posts more rational. It appears that you do not want to learn.

kowtaaia · Post by **kowtaaia** » Wed Nov 08, 2006 10:51 am

Dan Rowden wrote:Kow,

You might want to avoid trying to tell me what I know. It's not gang on one thing at all. You sound very much like someone from The Big View. You have attacked people for their supposed stupidity left, right an centre. Every now and then it might be appropriate, but I think by now people have gotten the point.

There are better ways of correcting a perceived error in thought. And I direct that point at everyone here.

It is a gang thing! The clique mentality isn't understood by verbally denying its existence. All that you need to do is read back to where the question about ad homs was asked.

If, as you say, people have gotten the point, then all well and good. Let's see.