GENIUS FORUMS

Pincho Paxton on Fri Oct 19, 2007 6:04 pm

I have spent 30 years studying Physics, and Quantum Physics.

From a purely physical POV, Buckminster Fuller presented very similar observations.
You might find his writing interesting.

jlj000jlj wrote:Pincho Paxton on Fri Oct 19, 2007 6:04 pm

I have spent 30 years studying Physics, and Quantum Physics.

From a purely physical POV, Buckminster Fuller presented very similar observations.
You might find his writing interesting.

Hmm yes, he did follow a very similar path to me. He chose a Tetrahedron, I chose a Hexagon with a tetrahedron partnership. Even though a hexagon is harder to fit into a totally 3D building block, it is so dominant, that I had to drop most other shapes. He also didn't think that math's was a reality in nature. Nobody really took him very seriously. Maybe I can put this idea a step ahead of him. I will have to read more of his work.

This article looks interesting, though I didn't read all of it: http://www.noetic.org/publications/shif ... try_lr.pdf

There are archetypal patterns behind every material thing in the universe. A new holistic science that understands those patterns will help us resolve some our most pressing environmental and social problems.

divine focus wrote:This article looks interesting, though I didn't read all of it: http://www.noetic.org/publications/shif ... try_lr.pdf

There are archetypal patterns behind every material thing in the universe. A new holistic science that understands those patterns will help us resolve some our most pressing environmental and social problems.

It seems that before mathematics totally took over everything, people were more concerned with nature with a physical identity. Nature's physical identity is the most important thing to discover, as it is the way to understand the universe. The Big Bang is a mathematical mistake, and there are many mistakes all made due to the mathematical rules of Science. But my theory is not about what we see, it's about what we can't see. The Quantum Physical world is too tiny to see, but it builds bigger shapes that we can learn from. The Quantum Physical world treats our eyes, and observations as a physical message. Our eyes are now giving out readings that effect experiments in a physical way. My theory says that we now need to understand the physics of waves in a new way. A wave isn't just a wavy line through the air, it's a particle travelling through something that bends it up, and down. But not only does it bend up, and down, it is on a path that our own eyes can create. And it is this path of bendy lines that led me to the hexagon. My Hexagons are part of the wave. The Hexagons are piled up to fill the entire universe. All of the holes, and all of the spaces are full of invisible Hexagons. So I am not just saying that a tree has a hexagon layout of leaves. I am saying that the layout of the leaves is because they are growing inside a hexagon layout of the air. That is the important thing to understand. It becomes clearer when you start to look at perspective. Perspective is the world through a hexagon telescope.. our eyes. When you look at your door, and it shrinks at the top, or bottom, it is actually being scaled through a hexagon pyramid of lenses. There are so many clues to the Hexagon universe, but you have to be a detective to find them. You also have to rethink everything that you have been taught by Science. Science says that we get perspective from light travelling diagonally to your eyes in waves, but that means that all diagonals are possible. However, electrons, and atoms are not arranged in all diagonal possibilities. They are arranged in all hexagon possibilities. If a photon was not restricted to hexagon pathways, it would miss half of the electrons, and waste its journey. A photon must hit an electron to cause the flash that we see. Therefore, the photon travels a hexagon pathway, which is a direct hit on all electrons. Therefore perspective is a Hexagon pyramid that we see through. There is no Void in space, there is a hexagon layer of pathways. This has to be true, because light can travel through space, and a void would not be able to propogate a wave pattern. The wave pattern would fall apart in a void. It would have nothing to wiggle against. So if you can try to understand how important the Hexagon patterns are, you will also understand that mathematics can't really find them. Only a study of nature, and philosophy can find them. And once you find them, you have a new Universe, a new understanding of life, and nature. You realise that your eyes send signals, and you realise that a photon is a few steps away from vision. You start to see all of the hexagons around you that are built from invisible pathways. And if you really study my theory, you will discover that hexagons are a shape created by bubbles pressing together, and do not happen in nature without such a physical restraint. then once you have the bubbles pressing together, you no Longer have a Big Bang. You have a universe created from a soup. A soup of bubbles which are simple to make. You make a bubble from a positive, and negative set of forces. Positive negative forces which are also common in nature. And so the universe was made from just a set of opposing forces, expanding matter into particles. My theory is very strong, it consists of all of the most common elements that we can find. Surely the first things in the universe would be the most common things that we can find today.

Every time I read your posts.... I burst out laughing...

I'm sure i'm not alone.

Why? Have you got an argument that shows that Pincho's notions are laughable?

Just read his posts.

And I have got an arguement. I am saving it for pincho when he replies.

I think the connection between hexagons, water and life is interesting. But I don't think the universe is like a big piece of hexagon graph paper. Maybe the brain is like hexagon graph paper due to its basis in water, so it makes the universe look like that to us, but I don't think the whole universe is like that.

Make an argument then. I have lots of backup of counter arguments. So I'm not bothered.

Matt Gregory wrote:I think the connection between hexagons, water and life is interesting. But I don't think the universe is like a big piece of hexagon graph paper. Maybe the brain is like hexagon graph paper due to its basis in water, so it makes the universe look like that to us, but I don't think the whole universe is like that.

It's just a matter of thinking about waves. What make a particle wiggle when it travels along? It can't just move up, and down for no reason.

Pincho Paxton wrote:

Matt Gregory wrote:I think the connection between hexagons, water and life is interesting. But I don't think the universe is like a big piece of hexagon graph paper. Maybe the brain is like hexagon graph paper due to its basis in water, so it makes the universe look like that to us, but I don't think the whole universe is like that.

It's just a matter of thinking about waves. What make a particle wiggle when it travels along? It can't just move up, and down for no reason.

What makes you think a particle moves up and down as it travels along?

Matt Gregory wrote:

Pincho Paxton wrote:

Matt Gregory wrote:I think the connection between hexagons, water and life is interesting. But I don't think the universe is like a big piece of hexagon graph paper. Maybe the brain is like hexagon graph paper due to its basis in water, so it makes the universe look like that to us, but I don't think the whole universe is like that.

It's just a matter of thinking about waves. What make a particle wiggle when it travels along? It can't just move up, and down for no reason.

What makes you think a particle moves up and down as it travels along?

Based on scientific analysis, a photon creates an interference pattern that looks like a wave pattern. Therefore the photon has wiggled up, and down. I think of it as painting a wall with a paintbrush. You try to cover as much wall as possible with your brushstroke. I think that photons try to hit an area of electrons so that we see a full picture, rather than a speckled picture. Hexagons create a natural wiggly line in their arrangement.

Greetings,

A few thoughts:

1) Is there a better word than machine for the concept? Machines are an arifact, whereas
you are talking about universal structure. The machine concept is much too limited
for such a grand role in the Universe, and brings to mind the clockwork imagery
resulting from Newtonian physics.

2) There is an old concept called Aether, the finest grade of physical reality through
which light, heat, etc. may propagate. Since some of your examples are of
photons, this related concept may have application. Did this concept have
any role in your creation?

3) In a sense, you seem to be talking about a unified field theory/string theory where
strings have become bubbles. Is the hexagonal character of the universe you describe
derived from how bubbles interact, or is the behavior of bubbles determined by the hexagonal "field"?

4) Is this a physical theory, a metaphysical theory, or some new categorization?

Wondering,

JLJ

jlj000jlj wrote:Greetings,

A few thoughts:

1) Is there a better word than machine for the concept? Machines are an arifact, whereas
you are talking about universal structure. The machine concept is much too limited
for such a grand role in the Universe, and brings to mind the clockwork imagery
resulting from Newtonian physics.

2) There is an old concept called Aether, the finest grade of physical reality through
which light, heat, etc. may propagate. Since some of your examples are of
photons, this related concept may have application. Did this concept have
any role in your creation?

3) In a sense, you seem to be talking about a unified field theory/string theory where
strings have become bubbles. Is the hexagonal character of the universe you describe
derived from how bubbles interact, or is the behavior of bubbles determined by the hexagonal "field"?

4) Is this a physical theory, a metaphysical theory, or some new categorization?

Wondering,

JLJ

1/ This naturally formed Aether makes decisions based on energy levels similar to a human brain making decisions based on energy levels. I called it the Sentience Machine, because it behaves like a Turing Machine. Take Photons again, they hit a wall in a special way. They are grabbed by the most powerful electrons based on energy levels. When an electron is hit, it becomes weaker. And so the wall is painted in rows. It's very mechanical, but also natural.

2/ Yes it's Aether, but I could not remeber the word until you posted it.

3/ Bubbles fill an area in a mathematical way which creates hexagons.

4/ It's mostly Quantum Physical. where the laws of an invisible Aether are possible.