Talking to scientists all week has lead me to the conclusion that they have forgot to include nature in their mathematical equations. The current talking point in science is negative mass to explain Dark Matter.
What would negative mass mean in nature? It seems to mean that a body can be sucked inside itself, turned inside out, and pull in whatever is outside of itself. That does not sound very much like nature to me. That sounds like Sci-fi. But it doesn't end there, and it didn't start there. The loss of nature started many years ago with mathematics. When someone suggested that a Black Hole has a gravitational force that is infinite. Or that the Big Bang contained all matter in a singularity that exploded it all outwards. How about simple gravity, that infinite Gravitons shoot out of matter in every direction until they catch hold of something and reel it in like the Gravitons are on a fishing trip? These Gravitons travel for infinity as well, and effect everything all the way to the end of the Universe. I don't really see nature in any of this. I see bad mathematics.
In nature, none of these infinites are required. Gravity does not need to use infinite Gravitons, or infinite energy. There are too many infinites in mathematics. Time paradox through the theory of relativity means that a new Universe is created everytime you sneeze (joke). Every time something happens in the Universe a fork is created in time, and this fork road is made because each body has its own relative timeline. Another infinite equation, and more infinite energy required.
I want science to take a look at nature, and see how many things around them are doing anything infinite, or even producing more energy than they start with. How many people are popping in from the future to pay us a visit? How does anything have negative mass?
Gravity does not need to travel outwards infinitely, because it can travel towards us instead. Gravity can be a push instead of a pull. Then you don't need Dark Matter, or negative mass, because this push solves the problem. Gravity should be more like the sea, with pressure surrounding us from all directions, but a pressure wave that is simply a vibration. Nature is a fractal, so I want physics to be a fractal of nature.
So, science has forgot to include nature in its equations.
Have scientist forgot that they are talking about nature?
- Pincho Paxton
- Posts: 1305
- Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 10:05 am
-
Conservationist
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 2:48 am
- Contact:
Re: Have scientist forgot that they are talking about nature?
Interesting. I think this makes sense, because the best forces for not draining energy would be cyclic and semi-standing/static in nature.Pincho Paxton wrote:Gravity does not need to travel outwards infinitely, because it can travel towards us instead. Gravity can be a push instead of a pull. Then you don't need Dark Matter, or negative mass, because this push solves the problem. Gravity should be more like the sea, with pressure surrounding us from all directions, but a pressure wave that is simply a vibration.