Genius Rules

Discussion of the nature of Ultimate Reality and the path to Enlightenment.
Kevin Solway
Posts: 2766
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2001 8:43 am
Location: Australia
Contact:

Re: Genius Rules

Post by Kevin Solway »

clyde wrote:I do understand the feeling . . . .
What you describe there has no relation at all to what I experience.
clyde
Posts: 680
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2006 3:04 pm

Re: Genius Rules

Post by clyde »

Kevin; That may be. Describe what you experience when you feel that you may be the only person who exists.
clyde
Posts: 680
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2006 3:04 pm

Re: Genius Rules

Post by clyde »

Dan Rowden wrote:Clyde,

Does "No Harm", mean to everyone what it means to you?
Dan, What does "no harm" mean to you?
Kevin Solway
Posts: 2766
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2001 8:43 am
Location: Australia
Contact:

Re: Genius Rules

Post by Kevin Solway »

clyde wrote:Describe what you experience when you feel that you may be the only person who exists.
I experience the logical knowledge that I may be the only person.

Your mode of thinking is too divorced from mine for this conversation to continue. No communication is possible.
clyde
Posts: 680
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2006 3:04 pm

Re: Genius Rules

Post by clyde »

Kevin; Actually, what you said was that you were uncertain ("Not for sure.") if other people exist, which makes communication for YOU uncertain as you don't know if I or anyone else really exists. I don't think you really believe that you are alone, but maybe you can convince me : )
Elizabeth Isabelle
Posts: 3771
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 11:35 am

Re: Genius Rules

Post by Elizabeth Isabelle »

Kevin Solway wrote:
clyde wrote:Describe what you experience when you feel that you may be the only person who exists.
I experience the logical knowledge that I may be the only person.

Your mode of thinking is too divorced from mine for this conversation to continue. No communication is possible.
Interpretation:

It is not a feeling, but a recognition of one of many possibilities. A rough illustration would be that Kevin recognizes that all this could just be a dream, and he is dreaming all of us - therefore we might not actually be people, but mere figments of his imagination. He is not saying that this is definitely how it is, or even putting a measure of true likelihood on it, but merely acknowledging that this option is within the realm of possibility.
User avatar
Dan Rowden
Posts: 5740
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 8:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Genius Rules

Post by Dan Rowden »

clyde wrote:
Dan Rowden wrote:Clyde,

Does "No Harm", mean to everyone what it means to you?
Dan, What does "no harm" mean to you?
It doesn't matter Clyde. My point is people can mean different things though employing the same words. I frankly don't get your intention in this thread. There are some words and concepts that people may understand in the same way as an enlightened person, and other they may not. It's patently obvious that only an enlightened person can determine if they are [being conceived the same way] or not. Maybe you could give a specific example of a word or term that you think exemplifies your point, whatever that actually is.
Kevin; I do understand the feeling. It seems natural for some (myself included) to sometimes feel that the universe is sustained by our awareness alone.
Funny that you interpreted what Kevin said as solipsism. There are a few ways his view could be interpreted. That one didn't occur to me at all.
Elizabeth Isabelle
Posts: 3771
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 11:35 am

Re: Genius Rules

Post by Elizabeth Isabelle »

Dan Rowden wrote:
clyde wrote:Kevin; I do understand the feeling. It seems natural for some (myself included) to sometimes feel that the universe is sustained by our awareness alone.
Funny that you interpreted what Kevin said as solipsism. There are a few ways his view could be interpreted. That one didn't occur to me at all.
That's David's view. Y'all ever going to do that differentiation chart?
User avatar
Dan Rowden
Posts: 5740
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 8:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Genius Rules

Post by Dan Rowden »

Dave is a solipsist? What can one say; he's on his Pat Malone in that one.
Elizabeth Isabelle
Posts: 3771
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 11:35 am

Re: Genius Rules

Post by Elizabeth Isabelle »

You never read WOTI? Chapter 6, under Brain Constructions reads:
Note that we never experience the "outside world" in any shape or form. The entire scope of our experiences is confined to what the brain happens to create. The people we love and hate, the large solid buildings in which they live, the distant mountains, the stars and galaxies in the sky - all of them are constructions of the brain. In a very real sense, the brain is all we ever experience.
That seems like a straight-forward interpretation of David's words to me.
User avatar
Dan Rowden
Posts: 5740
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 8:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Genius Rules

Post by Dan Rowden »

Oh, ok. My notion of Solipsism is more extreme than that, in that it doesn't just mean that differentiation of things occurs due to the brain, but that reality itself is a product of it. That can't work, obviously, because it would mean the causes of oneself were also a product of the brain. i.e. one would be self-caused. Could it be that all the things I experience are a product of my own brain? Sure, that's possible, but given the existence of rap music and Victor it would also necessitate that I really fuckin' hate myself! :)

Also, you didn't seem to get my Pat Malone pun :(
Elizabeth Isabelle
Posts: 3771
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 11:35 am

Re: Genius Rules

Post by Elizabeth Isabelle »

Dan Rowden wrote:Also, you didn't seem to get my Pat Malone pun :(
I did; I just didn't have a snappy comeback.

And I interpreted David's words as more extreme than you did.
Last edited by Elizabeth Isabelle on Thu Nov 29, 2007 12:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Carl G
Posts: 2659
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 12:52 pm
Location: Arizona

Re: Genius Rules

Post by Carl G »

Aw, c'mon, Victor is a hoot. And so is Laird Totality. Both are entertaining, tend to stay on topic, and get people to think. Unlike many of the dimmer bulbs who like to 'enlighten' this Forum with their confused fantasies.
Good Citizen Carl
User avatar
Dan Rowden
Posts: 5740
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 8:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Genius Rules

Post by Dan Rowden »

Next you'll be telling me that Rap Music is great. You're a sick puppy, Carl. Sick, sick, sick.
Ataraxia
Posts: 594
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 11:41 pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: Genius Rules

Post by Ataraxia »

Dan Rowden wrote:Oh, ok. My notion of Solipsism is more extreme than that, in that it doesn't just mean that differentiation of things occurs due to the brain, but that reality itself is a product of it. That can't work, obviously, because it would mean the causes of oneself were also a product of the brain. i.e. one would be self-caused. Could it be that all the things I experience are a product of my own brain? Sure, that's possible, but given the existence of rap music and Victor it would also necessitate that I really fuckin' hate myself! :)

Also, you didn't seem to get my Pat Malone pun :(
The best way to escape solipsism is to jump off a tall building and see if you can think your way out of the problem on the way down.
User avatar
Dan Rowden
Posts: 5740
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 8:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Genius Rules

Post by Dan Rowden »

What if you're a slow thinker?
Ataraxia
Posts: 594
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 11:41 pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: Genius Rules

Post by Ataraxia »

Dan Rowden wrote:What if you're a slow thinker?
Then at least remember to attach the bungee chord.
User avatar
Dan Rowden
Posts: 5740
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 8:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Genius Rules

Post by Dan Rowden »

Or choose a really tall building. And another question: when a solipsist dies, is that suicide?
Ataraxia
Posts: 594
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 11:41 pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: Genius Rules

Post by Ataraxia »

Mate,it's holocaust!

:D
User avatar
Tomas
Posts: 4328
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 2:15 am
Location: North Dakota

Re: Genius Rules

Post by Tomas »

Elizabeth Isabelle wrote:
Kevin Solway wrote:
clyde wrote:Describe what you experience when you feel that you may be the only person who exists.
I experience the logical knowledge that I may be the only person.

Your mode of thinking is too divorced from mine for this conversation to continue. No communication is possible.
Interpretation:

It is not a feeling, but a recognition of one of many possibilities. A rough illustration would be that Kevin recognizes that all this could just be a dream, and he is dreaming all of us - therefore we might not actually be people, but mere figments of his imagination. He is not saying that this is definitely how it is, or even putting a measure of true likelihood on it, but merely acknowledging that this option is within the realm of possibility.
Very good! Both Kevin and Elizabeth :-)

Yeah, i've thought that way for many, many years probably during my time in VietNam it began when i stopped in at a Buddhist neighborhood enclave (before i got shot up)... much to the chagrin of my other half (the girlfriend), when i "returned" to america i came back a completely different person than when i left after GI-Joe army training in Ft. LeonardWood, Missouri.

There's a defining moment that i've never quite been able to put into words.

That very-most alone feeling.



Tomas

7

.
User avatar
Dan Rowden
Posts: 5740
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 8:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Genius Rules

Post by Dan Rowden »

Mate,it's holocaust!
Ah, yes. Solipsism is clearly evil then. Glad it's Dave and not me.
User avatar
David Quinn
Posts: 5708
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 6:56 am
Location: Australia
Contact:

Re: Genius Rules

Post by David Quinn »

Elizabeth Isabelle wrote:You never read WOTI? Chapter 6, under Brain Constructions reads:
Note that we never experience the "outside world" in any shape or form. The entire scope of our experiences is confined to what the brain happens to create. The people we love and hate, the large solid buildings in which they live, the distant mountains, the stars and galaxies in the sky - all of them are constructions of the brain. In a very real sense, the brain is all we ever experience.
That seems like a straight-forward interpretation of David's words to me.
Hardly. I dealt with this issue a bit later in Chapter 6:
Other People’s Consciousnesses

Having established that everything exists within the construction created by consciousness, I will now briefly address the issue of other people’s consciousnesses. Needless to say, the constructed universe in which I live is something that I experience within my own consciousness and nowhere else. I do not live in other constructed universes in other people’s consciousnesses. Each person’s constructed universe is unique and isolated from everyone else’s.

I do not really know, of course, if these other constructed universes actually exist. It could well be they are an illusion created within my own consciousness. Other people certainly appear to be conscious, but I have no way of establishing that they really are. After all, they could be like the people that I meet in my dreams at night. Dream people can walk and talk and perform complex tasks and do anything that "real life" people can do, even though they are nothing more than unconscious automatons directed by my dreaming mind. Perhaps a similar situation occurs in my wakeful life? Perhaps everyone I meet is an unconscious automaton? It is impossible to judge. I will never be able to reach a final conclusion about this because any evidence I might wish to call upon to decide the matter, one way or the other, will always be part of my own construction and therefore will always be fundamentally unreliable.

Since it is essentially an unsolvable problem, the only rational course of action is treat it as though it were any other empirical issue - namely, treat the evidence supporting the existence of other people’s consciousness at face value and make the provisional assumption that they are indeed conscious. I can reason that because other people look and behave like me, and because I already know that I am conscious, I can conclude that they are conscious as well. The evidence, circumstantial though it may be, generally seems to support this point of view. Although I am uncertain about it, I am happy enough to accept it for the time being, at least until compelling new evidence comes along and forces me to have a rethink.

When I speak of "the construction", then, I am referring to the totality of all constructions and not just my own. Things can certainly exist beyond my own consciousness, but only if there are other consciousnesses to support their existence. When I die and my own construction vanishes, the observable universe will live on in the minds of others. And should the human race and all conscious life on earth become extinct, well then, existence will have to wait until new sentient beings evolve - keeping in mind, of course, that concepts such as "waiting" and "time elapsing" and "existence" and "nothingness" have no meaning outside of consciousness.

At the moment, there are nearly six billion people on this planet, each of them existing inside their own construction. We can think of these constructions as separate dimensions, all happily coexisting side by side, with no interaction between them. The universe is like a multitude of bubbles, each bubble an isolated construction of consciousness, each somehow making room for the rest. It is an interesting picture of the Universe, but is it really true? Or is it simply a construct of my own consciousness, one that lacks any kind of objective reality? I will let the reader decide that one for himself.
-
User avatar
Jason
Posts: 1312
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 1:02 am

Re: Genius Rules

Post by Jason »

Dan Rowden wrote:What if you're a slow thinker?
Well it will also be a slow fall then won't it.
User avatar
Dan Rowden
Posts: 5740
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 8:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Genius Rules

Post by Dan Rowden »

Hmm, good point. What if you're dyslexic?
clyde
Posts: 680
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2006 3:04 pm

Re: Genius Rules

Post by clyde »

David;

I was recently reminded of a period in my life when I practiced some simple techniques that lead to lucid dreaming (being conscious of dreaming). My experience was that 'dream people' give a semblance of being people, but when closely examined do NOT appear/behave as actual people; i.e., you can differentiate 'dream people' from actual people.
Locked