Jesus

Discussion of the nature of Ultimate Reality and the path to Enlightenment.
sschaula
Posts: 1317
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 3:16 am
Location: USA

Post by sschaula »

Apparently you haven't removed your head from your ass yet. I wasn't trying to justify my point of view you fucking moron, I stated it. Also, I really hate using the words "point of view", it's something pussy whipped assholes use because they are affraid to confront their ignorance.
Okay, maybe I should have said, "your temporary belief system based on the 'amazing teachings' of the 'great sage' David Quinn." Or maybe just, "your stupidity"?

Afraid of confront my ignorance, haha. Man, I confront it everyday. Why are you so afraid to confront your own?
Way to completely avoid the question dip shit, it shows how inane and ignorant your thought process really is.
To you, it may.
The thoughts that come flying out of your head are so incoherent you can't even give a descent response when somebody asks you about them.
If I'm making no sense to you why are you responding so defensively?
First of all I haven't skewed anything, secondly I'm going to ask you again, where on this entire forum have you ever seen me use somebody elses words or thoughts to justify my own? Now I'm going to help you out on this, just because I have thoughtfully interpreted Jesus' words to be in accord with mine, does not mean I'm using them to justify anything about my self.
I don't need your "help" on that, buddy. I know exactly how you work. I still say you are skewing things Jesus has said to fit your viewpoint...(aka your stupidity).
So I don't have to dig through all the garbage you spew out before I respond to what you have said. Then hopefully instead of having a man to boy conversation we can have a man to man conversation without all the bullshit, and you just might learn a thing or two.
If you want to have a man to man conversation stop being so defensive, and stop name calling just because you're having a temper tantrum. Listen to what people are saying instead of denying it before considering it.

I know it's hard when it's about you personally.
Wow you pointed out a typo, way to be an asshole.
Wow you called me an asshole, way to be a thinker!
And whos approval might that be, yours? I'm simply tired of beating around the bush, or being politically correct with you. There comes a point in time when scolding a child isn't enough, you have to break out the whoopin' stick!
You want to try and do that, fuck face? I dare you. I will tell you where I live and you can come on over and try it.

Back to the point, aside from this bullshit which you previously said you wanted out of the conversation yet continue to insert into it: you are seeking approval from anyone. It's an unconsicous action.
What kind of shitty question is that? You have more important matters to focus on aside from my cursing and use of exclamation points.
True. But you don't.
- Scott
User avatar
Nick
Posts: 1677
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 8:39 pm
Location: Detroit, Michigan

Post by Nick »

sschaula wrote:Okay, maybe I should have said, "your temporary belief system based on the 'amazing teachings' of the 'great sage' David Quinn." Or maybe just, "your stupidity"?
No, I would still think you are an idiot. Besides I don't have a "temporary belief system" in anything. I have a value system based on what's true, reasonable, and wise. Belief is of no use to me.
sschaula wrote:Afraid of confront my ignorance, haha. Man, I confront it everyday. Why are you so afraid to confront your own?
Alright I should have worded it like this, people who say "oh well that's just your point of view" while debating do so only because they can't handle the truth. Something you have demonstrated by pissing and moaning about how uncovering what's ultimately true has made your life shittier. It's not the truth's fault that all you want out of life is a big mommy in the sky to coddle and hold you until you are as content as a baby sucking it's mom's nipple.
sschaula wrote:To you, it may.
A perfect example of what I was just talking about in my response above.
sschaula wrote:If I'm making no sense to you why are you responding so defensively?
A father isn't being defensive when he scolds his child.
sschaula wrote:I know exactly how you work. I still say you are skewing things Jesus has said to fit your viewpoint...(aka your stupidity).
And why would it matter to me if what was written in the gospels fits "my point of view"? I already said I don't need anyone else to back up my own thoughts and convictions. If you think otherwise then show me an example of where I ever used someone elses words to back up my own. I'll save you a lot of work and tell you straight up that I never have. It's clear you just don't have the balls to admit how groundless your claim was about me using the gospels to back myself up.
sschaula wrote:If you want to have a man to man conversation stop being so defensive, and stop name calling just because you're having a temper tantrum. Listen to what people are saying instead of denying it before considering it.

I know it's hard when it's about you personally.
Even if that were true, which it isn't, it wouldn't change the fact that I'd be arguing with a little boy, therefore I have to treat you like a little boy.
sschaula wrote:You want to try and do that, fuck face? I dare you. I will tell you where I live and you can come on over and try it.
Apparently you don't know what a metaphor is, you really are an idiot.
sschaula wrote:Back to the point, aside from this bullshit which you previously said you wanted out of the conversation yet continue to insert into it: you are seeking approval from anyone. It's an unconsicous action.
Of course Scott, it couldn't possibly be me getting sick of your shit. I mean why would I get fed up with someone throwing around groundless claims about putting words in someones mouth, or using someone elses words to back up my own. It couldn't possibly be that, no way, never. I promise you I would handle you in the same manner whether other people could witness it or not, I do it all the time with others.
sschaula
Posts: 1317
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 3:16 am
Location: USA

Post by sschaula »

No, I would still think you are an idiot.
And I you.
Besides I don't have a "temporary belief system" in anything. I have a value system based on what's true, reasonable, and wise. Belief is of no use to me.
Or so you believe.
Alright I should have worded it like this, people who say "oh well that's just your point of view" while debating do so only because they can't handle the truth.
Is that a true statement? Think about that for a second. THINK. You can do that can't you? Or do you just like to argue on the internet with strangers?
Something you have demonstrated by pissing and moaning about how uncovering what's ultimately true has made your life shittier.
Ha, pissing and moaning? I don't see how it came off that way.
It's not the truth's fault that all you want out of life is a big mommy in the sky to coddle and hold you until you are as content as a baby sucking it's mom's nipple.
Actually, it's reality's fault that I want that. It's also the reality's fault that you continue to ignore the fact that you and everyone else here wants the same.
A perfect example of what I was just talking about in my response above.
Wow, you're smart.
A father isn't being defensive when he scolds his child.
He is if the child says his mother is an ugly whore. Besides, you aren't my father AT ALL, dumbass...and you aren't scolding me. You're simply being defensive of your own stupidity.
And why would it matter to me if what was written in the gospels fits "my point of view"?
That's a good question to ask yourself. YOU have been the one talking about what Jesus supposedly actually meant. Why DOES it matter to you?
I already said I don't need anyone else to back up my own thoughts and convictions. If you think otherwise then show me an example of where I ever used someone elses words to back up my own.
Well you do it pretty constantly here, with all the talk of wisdom. It's obvious you got that from someone else. Imagine where you would have been without human contact up until now. I'm very sure you wouldn't be discussing these things, if you knew how to type in English, that is.

This is my point with the "temporary belief system" idea. You have latched on to the QRS philosophy like a little baby. You are sucking the milk out of David's ugly tit and spitting it up all over the place. Sure, the milk is mixed with a bit of your own vomit, but truth be told - the things that come from you have actually come almost entirely from others and you are just acting as a conduit for their ideas.

At least this is how you come off.

Besides that, back to your question, even in this very topic you've been claiming Jesus was talking about the same things you are. It's pretty obvious to anyone who has studied the bible at all that 1) you can't know much of anything about Jesus because he represents way too many things to way too many people and 2) it's pretty clear that he didn't have the same philosophy as you. But that's beside the point I'm making here: the point that you have also latched on to Jesus' words and tried to superimpose them onto your own belief system.

Why would you do this? I personally think you're still testing the philosophical waters, and you haven't taken the plunge yet. The fact that you come to this forum and discuss things shows that you're still looking for your justification from others. Your actions aren't the actions of a free thinker, but of a tool.
I'll save you a lot of work and tell you straight up that I never have. It's clear you just don't have the balls to admit how groundless your claim was about me using the gospels to back myself up.
It's based on my perception of you from your posts here. I might be wrong about you, as I suspect you are about me. Things are miscommunicated easily enough in real life...the internet is even worse! I don't need to convince you. I just put it out there and you can think about it, or you can bitch and moan about how wrong I am.
Even if that were true, which it isn't, it wouldn't change the fact that I'd be arguing with a little boy, therefore I have to treat you like a little boy.
Ha, do as you wish. Just think about what makes a man what he is, and consider if you're actually that. What is it? Bravery? Stubbornness? Drive? Compassion? Rationality? Are you actually any of those things, or do you just try to be them?

Does it take hard experiences to make a little boy into a man? Have you ever actually experienced anything hard?

Anyway, I don't give a fuck about you. Just think about yourself for a second before you go calling anyone else a little boy. Your actions on this messageboard tend to make me, and others I'm sure, think that you aren't too mature yourself.
Apparently you don't know what a metaphor is, you really are an idiot.
I was aware you were using a metaphor, and I was making you aware that if it became anything more than that then you could be seriously hurt. If you didn't pick up on that, then you really are an idiot.
Of course Scott, it couldn't possibly be me getting sick of your shit.
But Nick, why would a father get sick of his son's shit? Isn't a father patient? Or did you have an asshole for a dad?

If I'm so stupid, then why do you even take me seriously? It's obvious that you KNOW we're on the same level intellectually when you can't handle my "groundless claims".
I mean why would I get fed up with someone throwing around groundless claims about putting words in someones mouth, or using someone elses words to back up my own. It couldn't possibly be that, no way, never. I promise you I would handle you in the same manner whether other people could witness it or not, I do it all the time with others.
Blah blah blah.

What's the point of this discussion we're having? Is this about the point - where I said you are latching onto Jesus to justify your belief system? Or is this about you defending yourself? It seems to me that you're constantly trying to push it into the latter...not even in this topic but ANY topic.

Look for a second at the top of the browser bar, where it says "Jesus". Jesus is what we're discussing here. Not you. Not me. We're talking about our relationship with the idea of Jesus. Lets keep it on track.
- Scott
User avatar
Nick
Posts: 1677
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 8:39 pm
Location: Detroit, Michigan

Post by Nick »

sschaula wrote:Or so you believe.
No, it's what I know.
sschaula wrote:Is that a true statement?
Entirely, it's a way for cowards and manipulators to weasel their way out of an argument.
sschaula wrote:Or do you just like to argue on the internet with strangers?
I just like to clear up any and all confusion.
sschaula wrote:Ha, pissing and moaning? I don't see how it came off that way.
Trust me it did.
sschaula wrote:Actually, it's reality's fault that I want that.
It's impossible for anything to be reality's fault, fault is something that can only apply to thoughtful beings. If you mean you are pre-determined through cause and effect to act the way you are, then yes that is true, but that doesn't mean you wont be dealt with one way or another for your thoughts and actions.
sschaula wrote:It's also the reality's fault that you continue to ignore the fact that you and everyone else here wants the same.
This desire varies widely between people and beyond that not everyone lets this desire control them, or affect them much at all. Like I said, it's about values and one's ability to handle the Truth.
sschaula wrote:He is if the child says his mother is an ugly whore. Besides, you aren't my father AT ALL, dumbass...and you aren't scolding me. You're simply being defensive of your own stupidity.
I didn't say I was your father, but I sure do feel like one when having discussions with you. Again, I'm just clearing up the confusion.
sschaula wrote:That's a good question to ask yourself. YOU have been the one talking about what Jesus supposedly actually meant. Why DOES it matter to you?
Alright Scott here I go feeling like daddy again, I'll explain it to you real slowly. I responded to a question asked by another member of this message board about why Jesus is brought up on the forum quite often, while the bible isn't. I then went on to explain how Jesus and Christianity have very little in common if you wisely interpret what was said in the gospels. Easy enough to understand son?
sschaula wrote:Well you do it pretty constantly here, with all the talk of wisdom. It's obvious you got that from someone else. Imagine where you would have been without human contact up until now. I'm very sure you wouldn't be discussing these things, if you knew how to type in English, that is.
This has to be the dumbest thing you have said yet to date. Where would any of us be without human contact, or more specifically our teachers, parents, peers, and just about anything else you can imagine? Beyond that we don't even have freewill, so what the hell is your point?
sschaula wrote:This is my point with the "temporary belief system" idea. You have latched on to the QRS philosophy like a little baby. You are sucking the milk out of David's ugly tit and spitting it up all over the place. Sure, the milk is mixed with a bit of your own vomit, but truth be told - the things that come from you have actually come almost entirely from others and you are just acting as a conduit for their ideas.
We are all a conduit of the Infinite. You can point to this and that and say "that's why that thing does that!" but it's only an infinitely small part of why it is actually doing that. Sure I've been influenced by the thoughts and philosophies of other people, we all have. More importantly does it even matter? Not unless we mindlessly take on ideas without thinking them through for ourselves first. Even I get a little wary about the fact that I find myself consistently agreeing wholeheartedly with certain members of this forum, but that doesn’t mean I’m going to disagree with them just because of some insecure need to feel like I’m the sole factor in everything I think and do.

I think you just have too much pride in thinking that you are the only factor in determining your thoughts and actions, which is simply not the case and a result of a diluted understanding of the Infinite as it stands. I also think you are projecting a lot of your own pride on to me judging by your comments above. I have't felt one bit of pride through out this entire discussion, anger yes, but pride no.
sschaula wrote:Besides that, back to your question, even in this very topic you've been claiming Jesus was talking about the same things you are. It's pretty obvious to anyone who has studied the bible at all that 1) you can't know much of anything about Jesus because he represents way too many things to way too many people and 2) it's pretty clear that he didn't have the same philosophy as you. But that's beside the point I'm making here: the point that you have also latched on to Jesus' words and tried to superimpose them onto your own belief system.
I interpreted Jesus in a wise and open minded manner and you kept dropping your passive aggressive comments that were obviously directed at me. If you want to discuss what Jesus meant in his teachings go ahead, I'm all ears.
sschaula wrote:Why would you do this? I personally think you're still testing the philosophical waters, and you haven't taken the plunge yet. The fact that you come to this forum and discuss things shows that you're still looking for your justification from others. Your actions aren't the actions of a free thinker, but of a tool.
Good for you but I don't know how you can expect anyone to take what you say seriously when you are scared shitless of cold hard Reality and still clinging to mommy's teat.
sschaula wrote:Ha, do as you wish. Just think about what makes a man what he is, and consider if you're actually that. What is it? Bravery? Stubbornness? Drive? Compassion? Rationality? Are you actually any of those things, or do you just try to be them?
Think what you want about me, but if your going to open your mouth with an opinion about me I’m going to address it if I am compelled to do so.
sschaula wrote:Does it take hard experiences to make a little boy into a man?
I’d say so.
sschaula wrote:Have you ever actually experienced anything hard?
Everyday I have to wake up knowing that nearly everyone I encounter will never understand me or why I think and do the things I do. This includes relatives and friends I’ve known my whole life. There is absolutely no place for me in this world and I still struggle to come to terms with it at times, but you wont ever hear me complain about it. I think if you ask most people if they think my life is hard they would say hard is an understatement. What I just described are the reasons people commit suicide and shoot up high schools and workplaces. To them my life is a nightmare, to me it is a blessing.
sschaula wrote:Anyway, I don't give a fuck about you. Just think about yourself for a second before you go calling anyone else a little boy. Your actions on this messageboard tend to make me, and others I'm sure, think that you aren't too mature yourself.
It is what it is.
sschaula wrote:I was aware you were using a metaphor, and I was making you aware that if it became anything more than that then you could be seriously hurt. If you didn't pick up on that, then you really are an idiot.
Come on Scott, do you really think you are that important to me?
sschaula wrote:But Nick, why would a father get sick of his son's shit? Isn't a father patient? Or did you have an asshole for a dad?
Well if your dad never disciplined you that would explain a lot of things.
sschaula wrote:If I'm so stupid, then why do you even take me seriously? It's obvious that you KNOW we're on the same level intellectually when you can't handle my "groundless claims".
Again, to clear up the confusion, not to mention I have in fact been handling you and your groundless claims throughout this entire discussion.
sschaula wrote:What's the point of this discussion we're having? Is this about the point - where I said you are latching onto Jesus to justify your belief system? Or is this about you defending yourself? It seems to me that you're constantly trying to push it into the latter...not even in this topic but ANY topic.
Well I already know, and have stated what I’m doing in this discussion but you seem to have no idea what your doing. That’s usually a sign you should take a break and rethink yourself for a while.
sschaula wrote:Look for a second at the top of the browser bar, where it says "Jesus". Jesus is what we're discussing here. Not you. Not me. We're talking about our relationship with the idea of Jesus. Lets keep it on track.
You immediately went off track with your passive aggressive comments right here.

”It's funny how people always put words in the mouth of Jesus.”

“There are many people who "interpret" others incorrectly to justify their own point of view.”


Clearly these comments were not about Jesus, but about who, (which includes myself) was doing the discussing.
sschaula
Posts: 1317
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 3:16 am
Location: USA

Post by sschaula »

No, it's what I know.
It's what you believe you know.
Entirely, it's a way for cowards and manipulators to weasel their way out of an argument.
Really? I always thought i was a way of saying, "you're stupid - think again".
I just like to clear up any and all confusion.
Do you value that more than finding truth?
Trust me it did.
To you. :)
It's impossible for anything to be reality's fault, fault is something that can only apply to thoughtful beings. If you mean you are pre-determined through cause and effect to act the way you are, then yes that is true, but that doesn't mean you wont be dealt with one way or another for your thoughts and actions.
I see your point, but there are two sides to that coin. We are just a part of reality. We are little gears. When something happens because of us, it's both our fault and reality's fault at the same time. We are inseparable.

I did mean that we are predetermined through cause and effect to act the way we do. In all honesty, we have very little say over how we cope with things and who we are. Underneath our controlled behaviors are uncontrolled motivations which cause us to react the way we do to things. For instance, it causes you to argue incessantly about something as retarded as someone saying something slightly negative about you. A rational person wouldn't care to do that. And can you control it? You can try to fight it, but most likely the way you are is gonna plow over your attempts and laugh at you. And you will continue being the same type of person which this universe has created.

So I say reality is at fault.
This desire varies widely between people and beyond that not everyone lets this desire control them, or affect them much at all. Like I said, it's about values and one's ability to handle the Truth.
I disagree. In my opinion it's one of the deepest desires and it controls every move everyone makes. When I criticize everyone about this stupid belief, I'm not talking about the conscious level where we make decisions and through will power follow through. I'm talking about our character...who we are at the "deepest" levels. That's the shit that counts anyway - not the front we put up. I'm talking about what we truly value and have no control over changing.
I didn't say I was your father, but I sure do feel like one when having discussions with you. Again, I'm just clearing up the confusion.
Well what the hell were you trying to say then? What else could that possibly mean?

It's a good thing you aren't one, in my opinion.
Alright Scott here I go feeling like daddy again, I'll explain it to you real slowly. I responded to a question asked by another member of this message board about why Jesus is brought up on the forum quite often, while the bible isn't. I then went on to explain how Jesus and Christianity have very little in common if you wisely interpret what was said in the gospels. Easy enough to understand son?
Yea, I got that from reading your posts initially. Then I said you're full of shit, remember?

The fact is that no one here actually knew what Jesus was talking about. He said a lot of crazy shit which doesn't add up. Besides, Jesus and Christianity have a lot in common. Jesus was a rogue rabbi, teaching the true religion of Judaism, and Christians try to follow what Jesus said. It's pretty simple. Perhaps you should read more of the Bible in context before jumping to conclusions...before justifying your belief system with another's which hardly matches up at all.
This has to be the dumbest thing you have said yet to date. Where would any of us be without human contact, or more specifically our teachers, parents, peers, and just about anything else you can imagine? Beyond that we don't even have freewill, so what the hell is your point?
My point is you need to stand on your own two feet and stop hanging onto mommy Quinn.
We are all a conduit of the Infinite.
Haha, way to avoid the point. I was saying you haven't thought on your own.
You can point to this and that and say "that's why that thing does that!" but it's only an infinitely small part of why it is actually doing that. Sure I've been influenced by the thoughts and philosophies of other people, we all have. More importantly does it even matter? Not unless we mindlessly take on ideas without thinking them through for ourselves first. Even I get a little wary about the fact that I find myself consistently agreeing wholeheartedly with certain members of this forum, but that doesn’t mean I’m going to disagree with them just because of some insecure need to feel like I’m the sole factor in everything I think and do.
That would be an insecure need. If you truly believe you have thought for yourself and agreed with certain members here, then I will have to take your word for it. I only put it out there as something to consider.
I think you just have too much pride in thinking that you are the only factor in determining your thoughts and actions, which is simply not the case and a result of a diluted understanding of the Infinite as it stands. I also think you are projecting a lot of your own pride on to me judging by your comments above. I have't felt one bit of pride through out this entire discussion, anger yes, but pride no.
I kind of feel...nothing.

I can tell you're angry. Why are you so angry? Is it wise to get angry when some moron says negative things about you? Does it solve anything? Where are your values now?

This is what I'm talking about when I talk about unconscious motivations controlling who we are. This anger is definitely an unconscious tendency you have...why is it there...what caused it to be there in the first place? What purpose is it serving? Is it useful? Detrimental?

I'm not going to be able to take you seriously when you talk about "wisdom, etc" so long as I can see through your facade and directly into your character.

If you're serious about the philosophical path, this is the first place you should start. With yourself. Forget about an intellectual understanding of a concept of "the infinite". That's elementary school shit. This is the tough stuff, where you uproot every unconscious tendency and shine the light of reason into every crack and crevace of your mind.
I interpreted Jesus in a wise and open minded manner and you kept dropping your passive aggressive comments that were obviously directed at me. If you want to discuss what Jesus meant in his teachings go ahead, I'm all ears.
One thing: I don't see how something passive aggressive can also be obviously directed at you.

Anyway, like I said before I don't know what Jesus was talking about half the time. But a few things can be known. He was a rabbi. He tried to clear up the religion of the day. He was very intense about what he preached.

That's about all I've got.
Good for you but I don't know how you can expect anyone to take what you say seriously when you are scared shitless of cold hard Reality and still clinging to mommy's teat.
I don't know how anyone can take you seriously when you say such baseless things. I only ever said that philosophy ruins your life. I never said I regretted it. I never said I was quitting philosophy. Anyway, I don't care at all how some moron misinterprets something I've said. Go ahead and be wrong.
Think what you want about me, but if your going to open your mouth with an opinion about me I’m going to address it if I am compelled to do so.
Perhaps, as a philosopher, you should consider why you're so compelled to do so.
Everyday I have to wake up knowing that nearly everyone I encounter will never understand me or why I think and do the things I do. This includes relatives and friends I’ve known my whole life. There is absolutely no place for me in this world and I still struggle to come to terms with it at times, but you wont ever hear me complain about it.
I think I just did!

And I also think you just admitted that you don't have it so bad. I'm sure many people experience the same type of thing here. Just the other day in the worldly matters forum someone said they were going to kill themselves for this very reason. I understand it completely, since I have experienced the same thing. It's not a big deal. A big deal is actually having bad shit happen to you.

It's time to grow up and realize that you aren't the only one who feels these things. They are a common experience for nearly everyone in the world. Even people who fake a smile and a laugh. Probably especially them.
I think if you ask most people if they think my life is hard they would say hard is an understatement. What I just described are the reasons people commit suicide and shoot up high schools and workplaces. To them my life is a nightmare, to me it is a blessing.
Then you're only lying to yourself.
Come on Scott, do you really think you are that important to me?
I would hope not. But you never know how big of a temper tantrum someone is going to throw.

It's obvious this anger is somewhat important to you because it's been compelling you to write long posts about nothing important, which are stuffed full of shit talk.
Well if your dad never disciplined you that would explain a lot of things.
If your dad yelled and kicked your ass everyday that would explain a lot of things.

My dad whooped me a few times until I could fight him, then it ended. Then the military disciplined me. And now no one disciplines me.
Again, to clear up the confusion, not to mention I have in fact been handling you and your groundless claims throughout this entire discussion.
I haven't seen any of that. All I've seen is "wah wah wah". Seriously.
Well I already know, and have stated what I’m doing in this discussion but you seem to have no idea what your doing. That’s usually a sign you should take a break and rethink yourself for a while.
Yes, you're questioning why I'm judging you, quite angrily and illogically. That's usually a sign you should take a break and rethink yourself. For a long while, Nick.
You immediately went off track with your passive aggressive comments right here.

”It's funny how people always put words in the mouth of Jesus.”

“There are many people who "interpret" others incorrectly to justify their own point of view.”

Clearly these comments were not about Jesus, but about who, (which includes myself) was doing the discussing.
Was this topic about Jesus himself, or about Jesus in relation to the Genius Forum? Wake up, man.
- Scott
User avatar
Nick
Posts: 1677
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 8:39 pm
Location: Detroit, Michigan

Post by Nick »

sschaula wrote:It's what you believe you know.
No, it's what I know. Belief is nothing more than hope and blind faith. My values are a result of careful thinking and logic.
sschaula wrote:Do you value that more than finding truth?
Clearing up confusion is necessary for uncovering truth.
sschaula wrote:I disagree. In my opinion it's one of the deepest desires and it controls every move everyone makes.
For 99.999999999% of the population I think that's true.
sschaula wrote:When I criticize everyone about this stupid belief, I'm not talking about the conscious level where we make decisions and through will power follow through. I'm talking about our character...who we are at the "deepest" levels. That's the shit that counts anyway - not the front we put up. I'm talking about what we truly value and have no control over changing.
Yes we are animals, with animal desires, survival tools if you will, but that's only a part of who we are. Nobody is denying these desires, but the point is we have a conscience and it is up to us to use it. Say you want to go out and kill somebody because you want something they have, but you don't because you realize how irrational and greedy you are acting. This doesn't mean you are putting up a front, you are just using your other "human half" as a means of reaching a more reasonable outcome. The conscious can control the unconscious if we are caused to value a conscious mindset over the unconscious mindset.

Beyond that, the use it or lose it saying is a good way of explaining how one can become less and less affected by their unconscious if they are consistently conscious.
sschaula wrote:The fact is that no one here actually knew what Jesus was talking about. He said a lot of crazy shit which doesn't add up. Besides, Jesus and Christianity have a lot in common. Jesus was a rogue rabbi, teaching the true religion of Judaism, and Christians try to follow what Jesus said. It's pretty simple.
Right and all we can do is interpret these things with a wise and open minded manner, afterall what better way is there? Like I said earlier, people could have made the entire bible up, or each person who wrote about Jesus could have been making Jesus out to be anyone they wanted. Does this really matter to my point? Not at all. I just interpret what is said in the manner I already described and some of his words strike me as very wise.
sschaula wrote:Perhaps you should read more of the Bible in context before jumping to conclusions...before justifying your belief system with another's which hardly matches up at all.


So how many times are you going to make the inane assumption about me using the gospels or anything else to justify myself before you start providing an example of where I have done so? Or are you just keep acting like an asshole?
sschaula wrote:My point is you need to stand on your own two feet and stop hanging onto mommy Quinn.
sschaula wrote:Haha, way to avoid the point. I was saying you haven't thought on your own.
You have made these and simliar claims countless times and haven't once backed it up with a reasonable argument. What bothers you so much about me agreeing with Quinn that you have to keep throwing out these groundless claims? Could it possibly be those unconscious motives of yours you were talking about earlier?
sschaula wrote:I can tell you're angry. Why are you so angry? Is it wise to get angry when some moron says negative things about you? Does it solve anything? Where are your values now?

This is what I'm talking about when I talk about unconscious motivations controlling who we are. This anger is definitely an unconscious tendency you have...why is it there...what caused it to be there in the first place? What purpose is it serving? Is it useful? Detrimental?
I never claimed to be perfectly enlightened, it's just something I'm feeling. It's certainly not the reason I'm in this discussion with you. Why are you so worried about it?
sschaula wrote:I'm not going to be able to take you seriously when you talk about "wisdom, etc" so long as I can see through your facade and directly into your character.
So because I felt a bit of anger during this discussion means I'm a complete idiot? Well if that's what you want to think go right ahead, but if that's the case then every human being to ever exist is a complete idiot. Needless to say I don't agree with this reasoning of yours at all.
sschaula wrote:If you're serious about the philosophical path, this is the first place you should start. With yourself. Forget about an intellectual understanding of a concept of "the infinite". That's elementary school shit. This is the tough stuff, where you uproot every unconscious tendency and shine the light of reason into every crack and crevace of your mind.
Right, so why don't you practice what you preach?
sschaula wrote:Anyway, like I said before I don't know what Jesus was talking about half the time. But a few things can be known. He was a rabbi. He tried to clear up the religion of the day. He was very intense about what he preached.

That's about all I've got.
And like I said before the whole thing could be a big crock of shit, I just look for the bits of wisdom.
sschaula wrote:Perhaps, as a philosopher, you should consider why you're so compelled to do so.
I always do.
sschaula wrote:I think I just did!
Because I just explained to you an aspect of my life? You are badly mistaken.
sschaula wrote:And I also think you just admitted that you don't have it so bad. I'm sure many people experience the same type of thing here. Just the other day in the worldly matters forum someone said they were going to kill themselves for this very reason. I understand it completely, since I have experienced the same thing. It's not a big deal. A big deal is actually having bad shit happen to you.
I'll be the first to admit I don't have it so bad. Why are you focussing so much on my life anyways? You were just saying how you didn't want to do so.
sschaula wrote:It's time to grow up and realize that you aren't the only one who feels these things. They are a common experience for nearly everyone in the world. Even people who fake a smile and a laugh. Probably especially them.
No it's not at all like "everyone else", I'm not depressed, sad, angry, happy, excited, bored, or anything else. I just am, not many people can relate to that.
sschaula wrote:It's obvious this anger is somewhat important to you because it's been compelling you to write long posts about nothing important, which are stuffed full of shit talk.
I just recognized it was there and I figured I'd share it with you, by no means is it compelling me to continue our discussion, that would just be plain stupid. I never even got that angry, even when I cursed and used exclamation points. Damn Scott, it's like I give you an inch and you take a mile.
sschaula wrote:Was this topic about Jesus himself, or about Jesus in relation to the Genius Forum? Wake up, man.
So you want to show me a thread where everyone stays perfectly on topic? And tell me exactly what is wrong with going off topic in a thread anyways?
sschaula
Posts: 1317
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 3:16 am
Location: USA

Post by sschaula »

No, it's what I know. Belief is nothing more than hope and blind faith. My values are a result of careful thinking and logic.
You could be wrong. Perhaps you weren't as careful as you believe you were.
Clearing up confusion is necessary for uncovering truth.
Listen to yourself for a second. You are saying that discussing why I'm critical of you is necessary for uncovering truth. I don't think it is at all, unless of course you actually would consider what I'm saying. But you don't, so how can this discussion possibly have anything to do with truth? I don't see it. All I see is your ego shaking its fist at me because you haven't gotten over the hurdle of criticism yet in your philosophical practice.
Yes we are animals, with animal desires, survival tools if you will, but that's only a part of who we are. Nobody is denying these desires, but the point is we have a conscience and it is up to us to use it. Say you want to go out and kill somebody because you want something they have, but you don't because you realize how irrational and greedy you are acting. This doesn't mean you are putting up a front, you are just using your other "human half" as a means of reaching a more reasonable outcome. The conscious can control the unconscious if we are caused to value a conscious mindset over the unconscious mindset.
I agree with that.
Beyond that, the use it or lose it saying is a good way of explaining how one can become less and less affected by their unconscious if they are consistently conscious.
Perhaps. I don't believe it, though, at all. I don't believe anyone can be consistently conscious and unaffected by their unconscious. At least I've never seen it...nothing close to it. All I've seen are a bunch of liars.
Right and all we can do is interpret these things with a wise and open minded manner, afterall what better way is there? Like I said earlier, people could have made the entire bible up, or each person who wrote about Jesus could have been making Jesus out to be anyone they wanted. Does this really matter to my point? Not at all. I just interpret what is said in the manner I already described and some of his words strike me as very wise.
Okay, so now you're saying that only some of his words are wise. Before you were claiming Jesus wasn't talking about the Jewish God when he said "God", but that he was talking about the infinite. While that may be the case, I think you're trying to slip your way out of this one.
So how many times are you going to make the inane assumption about me using the gospels or anything else to justify myself before you start providing an example of where I have done so? Or are you just keep acting like an asshole?
I'm going to continue being an asshole until you stop being one, or until I get sick of being stressed out. I'm feeling pretty relaxed though.

I will continue saying what I think is true of you whether you want to hear it or not. Unless it's way off topic.
You have made these and simliar claims countless times and haven't once backed it up with a reasonable argument. What bothers you so much about me agreeing with Quinn that you have to keep throwing out these groundless claims? Could it possibly be those unconscious motives of yours you were talking about earlier?
What unconscious motive could it possibly be? I won't be able to make a reasonable argument because my claims are groundless...yeah, I do admit that. It's my interpretation of who you are. I don't have proof for you, beyond all of your posts here being basically forgeries of the QRS philosophy. That's not very good proof though...so yes, it's an unreasonable and groundless thing to say about you.

That doesn't mean it isn't true!
I never claimed to be perfectly enlightened, it's just something I'm feeling. It's certainly not the reason I'm in this discussion with you. Why are you so worried about it?
Worried? No. I'm focused on it.

It seemed to me to be the reason why you were in the discussion. If it's not, then why are you actually?
So because I felt a bit of anger during this discussion means I'm a complete idiot? Well if that's what you want to think go right ahead, but if that's the case then every human being to ever exist is a complete idiot. Needless to say I don't agree with this reasoning of yours at all.
It means you've got some issues which are hiding in the shadows cast by your consciousness candle.
Right, so why don't you practice what you preach?
Well, I do. But I also think it's impossible.
And like I said before the whole thing could be a big crock of shit, I just look for the bits of wisdom.
Well why don't you stop eating scraps in Jesus' dumpster and create a meal for yourself? It doesn't make sense to discuss Jesus at all when talking about philosophy.
Because I just explained to you an aspect of my life? You are badly mistaken.
It seemed like you were complaining.
No it's not at all like "everyone else", I'm not depressed, sad, angry, happy, excited, bored, or anything else. I just am, not many people can relate to that.
Oh you aren't angry, huh? I am calling your bluff man. I think you are all of those things.
I just recognized it was there and I figured I'd share it with you, by no means is it compelling me to continue our discussion, that would just be plain stupid. I never even got that angry, even when I cursed and used exclamation points. Damn Scott, it's like I give you an inch and you take a mile.
It seemed like you got that angry. You should probably reread it again and see how you come off. Or have someone else read it and tell you if it seemed very angry, if you're too egotistical to see it.
So you want to show me a thread where everyone stays perfectly on topic? And tell me exactly what is wrong with going off topic in a thread anyways?
Haha, so now you admit it.
- Scott
User avatar
Nick
Posts: 1677
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 8:39 pm
Location: Detroit, Michigan

Post by Nick »

sschaula wrote:You could be wrong. Perhaps you weren't as careful as you believe you were.
You really are just as an asshole aren't you?
sschaula wrote:Listen to yourself for a second. You are saying that discussing why I'm critical of you is necessary for uncovering truth.
No I'm saying that discussing your poorly thought out statements and accusations are. Whether they are about me or anyone else, it doesn't really matter.
sschaula wrote:I don't think it is at all, unless of course you actually would consider what I'm saying. But you don't, so how can this discussion possibly have anything to do with truth? I don't see it. All I see is your ego shaking its fist at me because you haven't gotten over the hurdle of criticism yet in your philosophical practice.
God damn, can you for one second not focus on me or my ego? That's another problem you have, you always make it a me vs. you type discussion.
sschaula wrote:Okay, so now you're saying that only some of his words are wise.
That's what I've been saying.
sschaula wrote:What unconscious motive could it possibly be? I won't be able to make a reasonable argument because my claims are groundless...yeah, I do admit that. It's my interpretation of who you are. I don't have proof for you, beyond all of your posts here being basically forgeries of the QRS philosophy. That's not very good proof though...so yes, it's an unreasonable and groundless thing to say about you.

That doesn't mean it isn't true!
Do you think it's wise to make groundless claims for no good reason just because there's a chance it might be true no matter how small? What if the entire world started doing this all the time? How many bad decisions would be made because of this? The war in Iraq comes to mind.
sschaula wrote:Worried? No. I'm focused on it.
Well, why are you focused on it? You just can't stop thinking about me can you?
sschaula wrote:It seemed to me to be the reason why you were in the discussion. If it's not, then why are you actually?
To clear up the confusion.
sschaula wrote:It means you've got some issues which are hiding in the shadows cast by your consciousness candle.
It means I don't have infinite patience for whiny assholes like yourself. Wah, that's just your point of view! Wah, that's just what you believe! Sounds just like a snotty little teenager who never got his ass kicked.
sschaula wrote:Well, I do. But I also think it's impossible.
Just because you can't take the heat doesn't mean others can't. What kind of asshole would want to discourage someone else from succeeding where he failed just because he's a pussy whipped bitch? It would be much easier for you to come to terms with the fact that there are much stronger individuals out there than yourself.
sschaula wrote:Well why don't you stop eating scraps in Jesus' dumpster and create a meal for yourself? It doesn't make sense to discuss Jesus at all when talking about philosophy.
I never was discussing Jesus directly, I was discussing the wisdom found on some of his teachings. You and E.I. were the ones who kept focussing on Jesus the Jew, or the gnostic Jesus, or whatever other kind of Jesus you want to make up.
sschaula wrote:Oh you aren't angry, huh? I am calling your bluff man. I think you are all of those things.
Ok.
sschaula wrote:It seemed like you got that angry. You should probably reread it again and see how you come off. Or have someone else read it and tell you if it seemed very angry, if you're too egotistical to see it.
I already admitted I was feeling angry, although me getting frustrated with your stupidity would have been more accurate. Regardless, the conversation would have went the same way if I was as calm as a cucumber except for maybe one or two F bombs.
sschaula wrote:Haha, so now you admit it.
Sure why not! You weren't ready to discuss this topic in a mature manner so I thought it was more appropriate to address your stupidity directly rather than bother discussing anymore of the topic. As far as I'm concerned the latter is much more important.
User avatar
Trevor Salyzyn
Posts: 2420
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:52 pm
Location: Canada

Post by Trevor Salyzyn »

I'm sorry, I'm having a hard time reading this thread. This fight is directionless. It might not be as petty as it looks: you both indeed may have totally valid points about each other's flaws. But it's not philosophically interesting, nor does it progress one whit toward clearing up the topic under scrutiny.

Nick and Scott, you both have wildly different views about Jesus, and if you cut off the emotional baggage this might manage to be a half interesting debate. As it stands, I don't care how stupid you each think the other person is. That shouldn't even be a point of contention.
sschaula
Posts: 1317
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 3:16 am
Location: USA

Post by sschaula »

You really are just as an asshole aren't you?
I can be.
No I'm saying that discussing your poorly thought out statements and accusations are. Whether they are about me or anyone else, it doesn't really matter.
That's a stupid thing to say.
God damn, can you for one second not focus on me or my ego? That's another problem you have, you always make it a me vs. you type discussion.
And you don't? Fucking laughable man. I can stop focusing on you and your ego when I'm done talking to you. While I'm talking to you I kind of can't help it, because it's obvious you've got some issues. Perhaps if you weren't getting so pissed off there wouldn't be so much for me to focus on.
That's what I've been saying.
That wasn't the end of the statement. Reread and think.
Do you think it's wise to make groundless claims for no good reason just because there's a chance it might be true no matter how small?
First of all, am I trying to be wise? No.

Secondly, I can do anything I choose.

Finally, the claims I made weren't absolutely groundless. I just can't make a good enough case for it to be considered a reasonable argument. I did say that this topic can work as proof, as well as every post you've made here mimicking QRS philosophy. Consider that for more than a second.
What if the entire world started doing this all the time? How many bad decisions would be made because of this? The war in Iraq comes to mind.
You can have your stupid political opinions, but they'll be meaningless when a plane slams into a building you're in. Or when a someone detonates a bomb in your subway car. Which will probably happen a few years after the next president comes in and pulls our troops out of Iraq, loosens homeland security, puts a tight rein on wire tapping, and jams more gun control laws down our throats.

Anyway, back to the original point: Tons of people do this all the time. It's unwise. I didn't do it here. The government didn't do it with Iraq, despite some people admitting faulty intelligence.
Well, why are you focused on it? You just can't stop thinking about me can you?
Are you gay or something? I'm not. I'm focused on it because it's blatant.
To clear up the confusion.
What confusion. I think you're full of shit. No confusion here. Is there something you're confused about?
It means I don't have infinite patience for whiny assholes like yourself. Wah, that's just your point of view! Wah, that's just what you believe! Sounds just like a snotty little teenager who never got his ass kicked.
Well, I'm 22. I've had my ass kicked a few times. Nothing serious.

That's too bad for you, how you can't handle how other people are. Boo hoo. How you can handle criticism. Wah wah wah.

I don't see anywhere where I've been whining like you've been. You might want to take a look over again and see that there's nothing of the sort, then look at your own posts and see yourself for who you are. You've been pissing and moaning here, Nick. Get over it, whatever it is.
Just because you can't take the heat doesn't mean others can't.
Show me a single person who has done it. I believe it's impossible. Not based on me not being able to "take the heat", haha. I can take any heat that comes my way.

"In theory" doesn't cut it for me. Show me a single person who has become perfectly enlightened, and I will stop saying it's impossible.

But I won't stop criticising you for being a fool. People who say they're wise when they're not deserve to be shown their errors.
What kind of asshole would want to discourage someone else from succeeding where he failed just because he's a pussy whipped bitch? It would be much easier for you to come to terms with the fact that there are much stronger individuals out there than yourself.
Pussy whipped bitch...haha. You don't know me very well.

I don't discourage anyone from trying. Hey, it might be possible. I BELIEVE it's not. Who cares what I believe. Go out and do what you believe, and if you're listening to me instead of focusing on the goal, then you don't deserve what you claim to be seeking.

Here is what I discourage... I discourage you from thinking you're top shit just because you've latched onto the QRS philosophy. I discourage blatant stupidity. I discourage fools calling themselves wise. I discourage people who haven't thought, calling themselves thinkers. People who have anger issues (or any other issues for that matter) from considering themselves as enlightened.

By the way, yes I know there are stronger individuals than me out there. Me thinking it's impossible has nothing to do with my failure. It has everything to do with an awakening I had...with seeing things clearly.
I never was discussing Jesus directly, I was discussing the wisdom found on some of his teachings. You and E.I. were the ones who kept focussing on Jesus the Jew, or the gnostic Jesus, or whatever other kind of Jesus you want to make up.
Why is it that all "thinkers" tend to slither their way out of any trap they find themselves in? If truth was really the thing you valued most, then there wouldn't be that desperate need for you to get away unscathed.

You were discussing Jesus directly. Reread what you wrote. I'll help you out a bit: recall the part where you were discussing Jesus' view of God.
I already admitted I was feeling angry, although me getting frustrated with your stupidity would have been more accurate. Regardless, the conversation would have went the same way if I was as calm as a cucumber except for maybe one or two F bombs.
Anger...frustration....okay, is that really any better? Does a wise person become frustrated? Is it wise to get frustrated at someone else's stupidity? Think about these things for a minute, Nick. Your philosophy is obviously a front. It's not that you're not perfect...I think it's that you're holding onto the beliefs of QRS. Maybe because it seems that it's all you have left?
Sure why not! You weren't ready to discuss this topic in a mature manner so I thought it was more appropriate to address your stupidity directly rather than bother discussing anymore of the topic. As far as I'm concerned the latter is much more important.
You saw I was being immature so you came down to my level. Interesting way to justify your actions.
- Scott
User avatar
Nick
Posts: 1677
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 8:39 pm
Location: Detroit, Michigan

Post by Nick »

sschaula wrote:And you don't? Fucking laughable man. I can stop focusing on you and your ego when I'm done talking to you. While I'm talking to you I kind of can't help it, because it's obvious you've got some issues.
You are way too sensitive.
sschaula wrote:Perhaps if you weren't getting so pissed off there wouldn't be so much for me to focus on.
If you want to make my admission of anger, which disapated a long time ago, a cornerstone to your argument against me then so be it. I guess you gotta have something to stand on right?
sschaula wrote:Finally, the claims I made weren't absolutely groundless. I just can't make a good enough case for it to be considered a reasonable argument. I did say that this topic can work as proof, as well as every post you've made here mimicking QRS philosophy. Consider that for more than a second.
Would you say that a student is mimicking his teacher because he agrees with them that 6x6=36? If so then I guess I don't really have a problem with you saying that I'm mimicking them.
sschaula wrote:What confusion. I think you're full of shit. No confusion here.
You're right, there's no confusion on your end, just a whole lot of ignorance.
sschaula wrote:How you can't handle criticism.
Actually I encourage criticism of myself and others so long as it's reasonable and justified. Ever since I've been a member of this forum I've noticed that everytime someone critisizes you, you throw out the same old accusations about them being "mindless followers of QRS", "communists", or "a victim of australianism", the list goes on and on no matter who's critisizing you.
sschaula wrote:I discourage you from thinking you're top shit just because you've latched onto the QRS philosophy.
I don't consider myself top shit, low shit, or any kind of shit. I am who I am.
sschaula wrote:If truth was really the thing you valued most, then there wouldn't be that desperate need for you to get away unscathed.
It's in my nature to want to clear things up as much as possible. I wasn't aware I was at risk of being scathed.
sschaula wrote:Your philosophy is obviously a front. It's not that you're not perfect...I think it's that you're holding onto the beliefs of QRS. Maybe because it seems that it's all you have left?
The Truth remains whether "QRS" is around or not. Is the Truth all I have left? No, I'm not perfect. Is it all I need, yes.

Why did I just say "QRS"?
sschaula wrote:You saw I was being immature so you came down to my level. Interesting way to justify your actions.
It's impossible for me to sink that low.
User avatar
Duke
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 7:24 am

Post by Duke »

Trevor,
I think your pleas fall on deaf ears. Just watch, theres really nothing you can do.
User avatar
Carl G
Posts: 2659
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 12:52 pm
Location: Arizona

Post by Carl G »

I think it is totally appropriate for there to be a Genius version of The Fight Club in a thread about the prince of peace. How else can one come to peace except through war. Inner war, of course. Which can be facilitated by the occasionally bout of verbal fisticuffs between two mindful students. There is a delicate balance, though, between an excercise and a brawl, and this thread seems to be getting circular, and spinning away from coherence and the main subject. I suggest the 'combatants' increase introspection and lower their egos, before their energy is dissipated.
Good Citizen Carl
sschaula
Posts: 1317
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 3:16 am
Location: USA

Post by sschaula »

Nick,
If you want to make my admission of anger, which disapated a long time ago, a cornerstone to your argument against me then so be it. I guess you gotta have something to stand on right?
No, the cornerstone of my argument against you has always been the fact that you're not an actual thinker. Your anger has just been good proof.
Would you say that a student is mimicking his teacher because he agrees with them that 6x6=36? If so then I guess I don't really have a problem with you saying that I'm mimicking them.
If the student hasn't thought out and understood through experience why 6x6=36, then sure, that's exactly what I'm saying.
Actually I encourage criticism of myself and others so long as it's reasonable and justified.
But if it doesn't appear to be reasonable and justified, you throw a hissy fit?
I don't consider myself top shit, low shit, or any kind of shit. I am who I am.
Don't fool yourself.
It's in my nature to want to clear things up as much as possible. I wasn't aware I was at risk of being scathed.
Go back and reread after taking a break.
The Truth remains whether "QRS" is around or not. Is the Truth all I have left? No, I'm not perfect. Is it all I need, yes.
It's obviously not all you need. Apparently you need to argue. You're right that the truth remains whether "QRS" is around or not. That doesn't mean that you are reliant on the truth. Doesn't mean you're not hanging onto DQ's pocket.
It's impossible for me to sink that low.
Too late, buddy. Reread this thread.
- Scott
sschaula
Posts: 1317
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 3:16 am
Location: USA

Post by sschaula »

Trevor,

I didn't see your post last night.
I'm sorry, I'm having a hard time reading this thread. This fight is directionless. It might not be as petty as it looks: you both indeed may have totally valid points about each other's flaws. But it's not philosophically interesting, nor does it progress one whit toward clearing up the topic under scrutiny.
I agree completely. I decided at the beginning, when I made the first post in this thread, to continue on with this discussion no matter how far it went or how stupid it became.
Nick and Scott, you both have wildly different views about Jesus, and if you cut off the emotional baggage this might manage to be a half interesting debate.
What emotional baggage? There's none on my side.
As it stands, I don't care how stupid you each think the other person is. That shouldn't even be a point of contention.
I agree.
- Scott
sschaula
Posts: 1317
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 3:16 am
Location: USA

Post by sschaula »

Carl,
There is a delicate balance, though, between an excercise and a brawl, and this thread seems to be getting circular, and spinning away from coherence and the main subject.
I'd like to ask who is at fault for that. I've tried to bring it back, but according to Nick there's nothing wrong with threads going way off course. So be it.
I suggest the 'combatants' increase introspection and lower their egos, before their energy is dissipated.
Always good to do. It may seem like I'm getting all wrapped up in this, but really I'm not. I just made a choice to continue with Nick no matter what. To see if he ever actually gives up with enough criticism. It seems to me like he definitely got less angry, but he is still hanging on by a thread of stupidity.

I have no dreams of wisdom, and I find myself to be fine as I am, so I see no need to change my 'battle tactics'. I have a limitless supply of energy. Therefore, I will continue on as I am.
- Scott
User avatar
Nick
Posts: 1677
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 8:39 pm
Location: Detroit, Michigan

Post by Nick »

sschaula wrote:No, the cornerstone of my argument against you has always been the fact that you're not an actual thinker.
The fact eh? Even though you admitted you have no reasonable argument to back it up other than pure speculation. I'm very secure about my ability as a thinker, so much so that I don't care if you think I mimick David Quinn or Jesus or anyone else. It's just obvious you aren't as secure about your own abilities so you feel compelled to make these groundless claims about me and go out of your way to distance yourself from members of this board so you can feel like you are the only real thinker.
sschaula wrote:Your anger has just been good proof.
So thinkers aren't allowed to get angry?
sschaula wrote:It's obviously not all you need. Apparently you need to argue.
I don't need to but I do enjoy a good debate. It's just too bad you have to muddy the waters with inane claims that don't really serve a purpose other than to deflect any attention away from yourself and on to me. It just goes to show you don't really have any sound argument against me or anything I've said through out this entire discussion.
sschaula
Posts: 1317
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 3:16 am
Location: USA

Post by sschaula »

I'm very secure about my ability as a thinker, so much so that I don't care if you think I mimick David Quinn or Jesus or anyone else.
Then why are you still dealing with me in this thread? I think you're lying here. You do care.
It's just obvious you aren't as secure about your own abilities so you feel compelled to make these groundless claims about me and go out of your way to distance yourself from members of this board so you can feel like you are the only real thinker.
You're a bit off there.
So thinkers aren't allowed to get angry?
Anger isn't thoughtful.
I don't need to but I do enjoy a good debate.
We're never had a good debate, Nick. You need to argue.
It's just too bad you have to muddy the waters with inane claims that don't really serve a purpose other than to deflect any attention away from yourself and on to me.
This hasn't been about myself the entire time, dude. It started with you saying things about Jesus, and me saying you were stupid. Where is any discussion of me included in that??
It just goes to show you don't really have any sound argument against me or anything I've said through out this entire discussion.
I don't have a sound argument, but I do have an argument which is true.
- Scott
brokenhead
Posts: 2271
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:51 am
Location: Boise

Post by brokenhead »

So far I liked David's brief description of Jesus and His teachings the best.
Jesus is the Creator of this Universe. He chose to bestow Himself on this panet as a mortal rather than on any other planet as a mortal. This Universe teems with life, both mortal (flesh and blood) and spiritual, all of His creation, all under His care. He wanted humans to worship not Himself, but the Universal Father, who resides in each and every one of us. He came to "fulfill" the ancient Law, meaning we should cease observing the letter thereof, and do but one thing: open our hearts to the Father. That is all He asks of us, all else will follow. All else will make sense. Love God as He loves you.
Jesus is both Son of Man and Son of God; He is a Creator Son of the Universal Father. Jesus Himself surrendered His own divine will to that of the Father.
If His mortal remains have indeed been found, it means nothing. He shed it as we all shall, as a snake sheds its skin. What the Apostles and other disciples witnessed was not a physical resurrection, but Jesus using his immense powers to make his Spirit visible and tactile. It was done out of love, out of compassion for his followers. Jesus was so full of love that he had to learn how to control his miracles. "Let this cup pass" was a request He made to the Father because he loved his followers so much, he did not want to leave them. Yet He surrendered his will to the Father's.
The miracle of the resurrection was a miracle of love, pure, divine love that our Creator bestowed Himself on this planet as one of his lowliest sentient creations, then tarried after these creations slaughtered that incarnation. His love made him visible and touchable even though he was a spirit after he left his earthly body.
He then, as promised, poured out his Spirit over all flesh.
I am constantly amazed at people who scoff at miracles. It's the act of scoffing that makes them blind to the miracles in the first place. This is not an exhortation to gullibility; what I'm saying is, demand proof from God. You will get it.
User avatar
Carl G
Posts: 2659
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 12:52 pm
Location: Arizona

Post by Carl G »

brokenhead wrote:
So far I liked David's brief description of Jesus and His teachings the best.
Three questions:

1. David who?

2. What is David's brief description?

3. Who are you, and why do you advertise your brokeness?

Okay, that was four.
Good Citizen Carl
User avatar
Nick
Posts: 1677
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 8:39 pm
Location: Detroit, Michigan

Post by Nick »

Well Scott, I now understand why you are so certain unconsciousness can't be overcome in any significant or consistent way, you just can't do it.
brokenhead
Posts: 2271
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:51 am
Location: Boise

Post by brokenhead »

Carl G wrote:
Three questions:

1. David who?

2. What is David's brief description?

3. Who are you, and why do you advertise your brokeness?
1. David Quinn.
2. Follow the link on page 1
3. I'm not broken. It's just an alias. It has several connotations, to my mind at least.
What do you mean, who are you? I'm allowed to post, no?

The topic of the thread is Jesus. Yes?
Elizabeth Isabelle
Posts: 3771
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 11:35 am

Post by Elizabeth Isabelle »

brokenhead wrote:The topic of the thread is Jesus. Yes?
Well it was, now it's just a cat fight between Nick and Scott.
.
sschaula
Posts: 1317
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 3:16 am
Location: USA

Post by sschaula »

Well Scott, I now understand why you are so certain unconsciousness can't be overcome in any significant or consistent way, you just can't do it.
Really? Then prove me wrong by doing it. Or by showing me someone who has....just ONE person.
- Scott
User avatar
Trevor Salyzyn
Posts: 2420
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:52 pm
Location: Canada

Post by Trevor Salyzyn »

Scott, Nick did choose his words carefully enough that he's right, and I might even suggest in agreement with you [at least on this point]. He said "...overcome in any significant or consistent way..." rather than "...overcome completely..."

Can someone be more conscious than another, just as a human is more conscious than a dog? Or would you argue that there is no way to increase the quality of a person's consciousness in any perceivable sense?

If I were to give an example, I would say that an educated Westerner (highschool diploma) tends to have a more finely tuned consciousness than an uneducated Third World bumpkin.
Locked