skipair wrote: Nick Treklis wrote:Mundane compared to what?
Yo Mamma? J/k! :) :)
I'm speechless, this is probably one of the best instances of a "you mama" response I've ever heard. =)
skipair wrote:Mundane compared to what many seem to project onto language like ULTIMATE Reality, TTTruth, God, Enlightenment, or any label that is overly grandiose and religion-influenced.
People are always going to project their bias on to the words we use. It's impossible to accommodate all people in this aspect. Better to use words intelligently when it matters, and some times "grandiose" or "religion influenced" terms can help break people out of their normal thought patterns and see things in a way they never have before.
skipair wrote:I'm highly sympathetic to the notion that an important thing deserves an important name, but as I said earlier I think there are probably other ways to be positively influential and that won't present like diamonds and gold yet another thing to be blindly attached to.
What about using a word that one is "blindly attached" to in a manner they have never heard? Using words like god in the place of the totality, or reincarnation in place of causality can put things in perspective and help people understand the teachings that use these words in a deeper and more truthful sense. Why should the religious get a free pass when it comes to hijacking these words to spread their bullshit?
skipair wrote:To my mind, it's a "just the facts, ma'am" kind of endeavor. Calling it anything more than that ain't gonna help.
And the facts is all you'll get from me!