I could address this complaint to my parents for instance for giving birth to me while "intuitively" grasping what the world was like or society at large for creating such a system that makes no sense and consists of so much inequality and decadence while there are infinitely better alternatives that they will simply not embrace due to the interests of a few.It seems you have started from an incorrect presupposition. At the base of this faulty presupposition is a core idea, and this core idea is utterly false: you assume you are free, and you assume you have a 'right' to freedom. Therefore, you can specifiy and argue for all those 'conditions' you wish to place on your country, your city, your world, your universe, your cosmos; or you wish to argue against certain 'conditions' that are part and parcel of your country, your city, your world, your universe, your cosmos.
'Cosmically' and as far as 'the world' goes, it is impossible to argue that you are free. In truth you are utterly conditioned and dependant. There is simply no argument against this. This fact must be accepted. It is intuitively graspable (or should be) with very little reflection or argument. If you HAVE an argument, if an argument is part-and-parcel of your being, your personality, your intellection, etc., to whom do you address your complaint? Scream it to the wind, intone it into the sea herself, climb mountains and wail into the vast open spaces: nothing will change the simple fact that you are utterly a slave, a dependant, conditioned slave.
I suggest that a completely different outlook would necessarily begin to form itself were you to realize at a fundamental level your conditioned and dependant status. Then, a more productive and 'useful' conversation would result.
You seem to think that I don't "intuitively" grasp it, but I do grasp it, I just never accept it! See the difference? I can grasp I am a slave, but will I accept it? Never! And I don't care what the cosmos or society thinks of that. In fact, "suicide" is a great way to send both the cosmos and society home packing! Theoretically speaking of course...
The core idea is entirely correct despite the fact that it goes against the common presuppositions. Otherwise, I would not have the imagination to even consider such an idea in the first place! Since I can conceive of a different presupposition from the one that is "intuitively graspable", that alone makes that presupposition valid and realizable!
Also, "a victor must always speak of how the world should be than how the world is" and I fully stand-by this quote. No matter how "dependant and conditioned" slaves we are, it is our duty to break free of these "self-inflicted" shackles and attain true "freedom"! Hell, as I said, post-singularity even the universe could eventually bow-down to our intelligence!
And one more thing: 'cosmically' we are far less bound and conditioned as we are from the 'as the world goes' perspective. I would say that the iniquities that are imposed upon me from birth are far more restrictive socially (with regards to employment, happiness, health, etc) than the iniquities of the cosmos seen from the perspective of a consciousness: birth, death, lack of meaning or purpose, etc - people become "existentially" depressed because society doesn't take care of their needs and if they can't take care of their needs themselves, society will just laugh at them and call them "weaklings", "leeches" and "parasites". When everything is good in life, existential angst is non-existent the vast majority of the time, but since society likes to screw things over above and beyond the initial conditions that brought the despair, the mind lingers on the issue and it becomes a whole philosophy!
In fact, society takes the initial cosmic conditions and instead of transcending them and making eveyone's lives better, they EXACERBATE them and make the cosmic "evil" THAT much more apparent! So no, don't blame the cosmos for it. Blame it's unfortunate mistake, the human species.
Also, if "nothing will change the simple fact that you are utterly a slave, a dependant, conditioned slave.", then no "productive and 'useful' conversation" can result even in principle. All "productive" and "useful" conversation has to come from trying to transcend the problem, not accepting it and moving on since there is NOWHERE to move on if that presupposition is not challenged and overthrown! Otherwise, we might as well be fried by the next Gamma Ray burst - it would certainly fry that presupposition along with ourselves.