Re: Scientific certainty (was "The Truth of Enlightenment")
Posted: Thu May 18, 2017 7:48 pm
Is anybody finding this entertaining? It's about the only reason I can think of for allowing it to continue.
Discussion of the nature of Ultimate Reality and the path to Enlightenment
http://www.theabsolute.net/phpBB/
I sense you are the type of person who has missed a lot of things in life. If you can't understand my above post I can't help you.Dan Rowden wrote:Debate? Is there are debate going on here? Did you make an argument at some point? I must have missed that.
An example would be nice.SalMinolta wrote:It's amazing how much crap we are expected to believe at face value just because some twit with fancy degrees says it is a fact. I am no longer that stupid. How about you?
All I have to do is restate when I did in a different manner to have a debate. However, you are obviously not an original thinker.Dan Rowden wrote:The problem here is that you're unable to differentiate between an assertion and an argument. An actual debate involves argument.
Of course, I'm right about you. Nothing interests you besides the reflection of your own boring assumptions about reality.Dan Rowden wrote:The instinct expressed in your first sentence was correct.
Unless you have repeatable, observable scientific experiments to back your stance all you have is speculative mythology you blindly believe to be fact.Dan Rowden wrote:Firstly, your main statement is a lie. Secondly, every level of development of the human eye that is postulated by evolutionary science can be seen in extant animal phyla.
Evolutionary science does not state, as a truth, that we know how the eye evolved.
Dan, are you always posting in around 144 characters max as a rule? :-)Dan Rowden wrote:Is anybody finding this entertaining? It's about the only reason I can think of for allowing it to continue.
Perhaps we could draw straws? Btw, you do know who this guy is, right? Actually, maybe you might not. It's been quite a while and he mostly haunted the boards run by Naturyl (James Quirk) and Philosophaster. His 'original thinker' leitmotif triggered a memory. Think of Hawaii and guitars and martial arts. Actually it's been so long I can't think of his old moniker.Diebert van Rhijn wrote:It's going to stop, one of the 500 moderators here for sure could do it...Dan Rowden wrote:Is anybody finding this entertaining? It's about the only reason I can think of for allowing it to continue.
It's not a really unique schtick of course, it must work like a drug at some level of the mind. The channeling preacher syndrome?Dan Rowden wrote:Perhaps we could draw straws? Btw, you do know who this guy is, right? Actually, maybe you might not. It's been quite a while and he mostly haunted the boards run by Naturyl (James Quirk) and Philosophaster. His 'original thinker' leitmotif triggered a memory. Think of Hawaii and guitars and martial arts. Actually it's been so long I can't think of his old moniker.
Dear God:SalMinolta wrote:I find most people to be lying, hypocrite, two-faced con artists in one way or the other.
Since they are too stupid to realize I am playing chess when interacting with them
I have them at a severe disadvantage. They may move a proverbial 'piece'
and rather than take that move at face value I'm thinking things like
"Why did they make that particular move?" I am no longer angwed by their deception.
It's all part of the game.
They made the obvious move and left their queen unprotected. Very nicely
I take their proverbial queen while they don't even realize they lost their queen.
Bwahahahahahahahaha!!! Great fun!!
It's much nicer treating interactions with people like a chess game.
I don't blame them for trying to con me. Heck, it's all part of the game.
However, as I stated, the great fun is they don't have a clue I am playing chess.
Dumb sucker idiots. So much fun to take their queens when they didn't even realize
they left their queen exposed. Ha!
Go ahead and lie and say you've heard about people doing this
thousands of times before. Go ahead and try to con me, atheist type.
https://scontent.fhnl1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/ ... e=59743686