We all know the rooster came first! In terms of biology and genetics he came probably out of Africa. All other accomplishments might be dwarfed by that individual or small group who dragged a whole race out of the animal realm, invented primal speech and developed further basic human awareness. At least, that's one way to look at it, depending on what you're valuing. Basic mental abilities or launching a metal can into space?awiseman wrote:This is like asking; what came first, the chicken or the egg? The chicken being white men, the egg being Western Civilization. It's more of a feedback loop.
Just one possible view on this: Timeline of historic inventions. The list of fundamental, meaningful accomplishments of the Arab, Babylonian, Ancient Egyptian and Sumerian civilization is too long to list here. What needs to be understood is that civilizations were shorter lived in a world which was more often in upheaval in terms of climate, natural disasters and wars. All I see right now is a few relatively quiet centuries, building further on foundations of ancient civilizations, during which things do not get wiped out too much although at times we are coming close thanks to the nuclear achievements of a "suicidal feminized race". So far in history war has mostly served the nest, the women and the kids of the victors. Despite masculine heroics, the game itself was never masculine. The moment you understand this, you might want to drop your woman centric, girly tough talk, spit it out as the stupidity it is.But let's cut the nonsense. Name ONE significant achievement to come from Arabs, Africans, or any of the Aboriginal people of Australia or the Americas. I don't care what it's in: math, science, philosophy, art, or literature.
So you're just the same arguing for some ultimate civilizing power of the feminine then? In any case, the "harsh climate" theory is nonsense. Warmer climates are known, as near absolute fact, especially within the Middle East, to contain mostly cultures where being helpful to outsiders is positioned way more central, even as holy duty, than any colder or moderate climate. If you don't know this from either reading or experience, you've grown up in a shoe box in your grandmother's closet and nobody can help you. It's not up for discussion, as it would only show you've never been anywhere and just projecting some desired traits on your familiar surrounding and stripping them from others. Like some old gossipy wife!it appears that Europeans, specifically Northern Europeans, are genetically predisposed to pathological altruism. I think the harsh climate of Northern Europe that we evolved in naturally selected for people who were helpful to outsiders and open minded to new cultures. Now these evolved traits are being exploited...
Although I understand what you mean and am less opposed to the ideal than you might think, your vision breaks down rather quickly when it comes to practicalities. There's no indication that we can link the suicidal, degenerate and nihilistic tendencies to any specific, detectable property to select on. The weaknesses you mention sit deeper and arise, like Nietzsche argued in a "degenerate" type, a sign of cultural old age. You are proposing to beat old age. Fight cancer by cutting it out with amputations. It's madness. It also implies you'd need some police state to enforce all of it but such nanny state, such overarching control structure is itself the sign of a wheel chair, some artificial, crippling device. It's not masculine in any way.This suicidal, degenerate, and nihilistic minority of Europeans are the human refuse that natural selection would have culled from our people long ago were it not for the comfort and security of modernity. I for one wish these weak and diseased whites would off themselves tomorrow, as I look forward to the day when we have a leaner, meaner, wiser, stronger race of Europeans.