Robert,
Shahrazad does not mention the private history between she and I which might motivate that dishonest characterization.
The opinion I expressed has nothing to do with any “history†I may have with you. It is based on the many threads in different forums I have read through the years where you criticize QRS’s latest actions, even the trivial ones. I may have wrongly confused your intense feelings for QRS as hatred, but there was nothing dishonest about it. It may be love, I don’t know, but it certainly seems like an obsession to me.
The funny thing is, QRS don’t seem to care.
If you clarify that what you feel for QRS is intense love, then this matter can be settled once and for all.
Dan and I actually began chatting afterward. We had many pleasant conversations in which neither the debate nor our personal views on Zen and whatever were much discussed at all.
Go back and read what I said. I never claimed you have always disliked Dan, just QRS as an entity. You chatted with Dan in the past, but around November of last year you started attacking him gratuitously. This is certainly not a lie.
My first post here, after all this time, was a legitimate query.
This doesn’t sound like a legit query or honest statement to me:
I'll be sending on something shortly and money being what money is, how my personal contribution is used after the electronic transfer and the currency exchange doesn't matter since that it is extra is what is important.
We all know that you would never send a penny to QRS. Excuse me for thinking your purpose here was to troll, but do remember that my first guess was satire.
To suggest I enjoy reading his insults misstates the situation;
I thought the insults were exactly what you enjoyed. Sorry if I was wrong. It’s really hard to tell with a guy who claims that friends and enemies should be treated with the same lack of courtesy.
-
