September 11, 2001

[Carl G]

Fuck, Pincho. You're supposed to respond under my reply. Not by changing that which I replied to.

Anyway, the WTC collapse was an obvious scam from the get-go.

[Pincho Paxton]

Fuck, Pincho. You're supposed to respond under my reply. Not by changing that which I replied to.

Anyway, the WTC collapse was an obvious scam from the get-go.

Look at the time of my Edit, it was at the same time as your reply. So I never read your reply. I made my edit to make my post clearer.

[Carl G]

Ah. Hokay.

From one sheer genius to another, then, NO WORRIES.

[Tomas]

.


Washington Times Covers 9/11 Controversy

A lingering technical question about the Sept. 11 attacks still haunts some, and it
has political implications >> http://thedailybell.com/842/Washington- ... versy.html

[mensa-maniac]

Prince,

How is September 11, 2001 any different to other acts of violence that have recently happened? Why doesn’t the genocide in Darfur bother you to the same extent? Why have you been psychologically affected by this act alone?

Anything that is possible can happen. A terrorist attack on the world trade center is very tame compared to what is possible. I predict that some of these organizations will eventually get their hands on biological or chemical weapons that are capable of killing hundreds of thousands of people in densely populated areas.

The goal is not not allow the irrational acts of humans to affect one in an emotional sense. The big problem Prince is that you intrepret this as a personal attack agaisnt you. Moroever, you identity with the nation as a whole, and the members that run it. And then you label the terrorist group as them, and establish this divisive and conflicting duality in your psyche. However, you should not emotionally identity yourself with any group of humans at all, it is a form of tribalism. Members of the bush adminstration are just as ignorant as the Al-queda terrorist group, the two feed off each other.

Here is one way to view September 11: The terrorist’s irrational acts are intimately linked to the USA’s exploitative foreign policy that has been present in the middle-east for decades. Its not rational, but It's very understandable why an ignorant powerless force that lives in poverty will strike out against an ignorant powerful force that is very rich as a result. The duality plays off the other, and some degree of this type of irrational behavior will always exist in this world.

So one needs to be emotionally ready for anything, anywhere, anytime, because anything that is possible could occur, there is nothing secure.

Mensa says: Exactly! Couldn't have said it better myself!

[Tomas]

.


Highly-Credible People Question 9/11

"When one starts using his own mind, and not what one was
told, there is very little to believe in the official story."

The following people question the government's version of 9/11, or the government's openness
in providing information about the September 11 attacks >> http://www.911summary.com

[1456200423]

nEW 911 PHOTOS PROVE wtc EXPLODED FROM INSIDE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QgqTd3Z0M9Y

The story so far...
9/11: The Tip of the Iceberg (Part 1 of 2)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iW23PuBKiA0

9/11: The Tip of the Iceberg (Part 2 of 2)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNDurCBIqek

[KRWoods]

There are just too many variables to draw one conclusion from this incident, especially a conclusion based on a few pictures taken as the WTC was hit.
There are only a few people who can actually tell us what happened that day, and whether the plane was carrying explosives, WTC was blown from inside etc. and they're not going to tell.

They destroyed the WTC because it represents all they feel is unholy and against the will of their god. They wish to destroy America and her influence and instill terror in the heart of it's citizens. The reason it's been publisiced more than other incidents is because it happened so close to home, and because no-one expected something to happen in New York involving terrorists, a big city in the heart of the western world most likely gives the illusion of safety from all of that terrorist crap.

Anyway, the way America has reacted is all wrong, you don't fight fire with fire, you remove the oxygen from the fire's grasp or do something clever. How do you even know that Al-Qaeda etc. was responsible. Sure they claimed responsibility for it, but wouldn't you?

[cousinbasil]

There are just too many variables to draw one conclusion from this incident, especially a conclusion based on a few pictures taken as the WTC was hit.
There are only a few people who can actually tell us what happened that day, and whether the plane was carrying explosives, WTC was blown from inside etc. and they're not going to tell.

They destroyed the WTC because it represents all they feel is unholy and against the will of their god. They wish to destroy America and her influence and instill terror in the heart of it's citizens. The reason it's been publisiced more than other incidents is because it happened so close to home, and because no-one expected something to happen in New York involving terrorists, a big city in the heart of the western world most likely gives the illusion of safety from all of that terrorist crap.

Anyway, the way America has reacted is all wrong, you don't fight fire with fire, you remove the oxygen from the fire's grasp or do something clever. How do you even know that Al-Qaeda etc. was responsible. Sure they claimed responsibility for it, but wouldn't you?

But America has not been destroyed, and neither has her influence been weakened. By all accounts, Osama bin Laden is still alive.

[Tomas]

.

Regarding WTC 7

That report should explain the cause and mechanics of the collapse in great detail.

The reasons are as follows >> http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm

[Tomas]

.

Firefighters for 9/11 Truth teams up with Architects & Engineers

Major 9/11 myths exposed in two-night presentation >> http://cms.ae911truth.org/index.php/new ... up-with-ar

[Tomas]

.

People with demolition expertise questioning 9/11

Danny Jowenko (see photo)
Owner of a Dutch controlled demolition company, over 30 years of demolition experience.

Click here for Jowenko's views of WTC 7 >> http://demolitionexpertsquestion911.blogspot.com

[Tomas]

.

Mainstream Media Implodes on 9/11 along with WTC 7

Note: BBC announced the collapse had happened approximately 12 minutes before the event actually occurred. First the anchor, Philip Hayton, then the reported, Jane Standley.

See timeline graph & Peter Jennings comments >> http://cms.ae911truth.org/news/41-artic ... wtc-7.html

[Tomas]

.

"It Fell In Silence": The Collapse of World Trade Center 7

The widely publicized 9/11 Commission Report fails to mention the collapse of WTC 7 in its 568 pages. Looking beyond the limited information provided by the mass media about the fall of WTC 7, a number of questions arise. (several videos)

The 50,000 square foot building housed offices for the >> http://pupaganda.com/originals/Wtc_7.html

[Tomas]

.

Pilots For 9/11 Truth

Thank you for taking the time to inform yourself. >> http://www.pilotsfor911truth.org

[Tomas]

.

Fires have never caused caused skyscrapers to collapse

Excepting the three 9-11 collapses, no fire, however severe, has ever caused a steel-framed high-rise building to collapse. Following are examples of high-rise fires that were far more severe that those in WTC 1 and 2, and Building 7. In these precedents, the fires consumed multiple floors, produced extensive window breakage, exhibited large areas of emergent flames, and went on for several hours. The fires in the WTC towers did none of these things.

Stories & photos of out high-rise fires >> http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysi ... fires.html

[Tomas]

.

Fifty (unanswered) questions on 9/11

The following questions, some multi-part - and most totally ignored by the 9/11 Commission - are just the tip of the immense 9/11 iceberg.

None of these questions has been convincingly answered >> http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/socio ... 11_116.htm

[Tomas]

.

Mini-Nukes Were Used on 9-11

Two recent articles regarding the use of mini-nukes >> http://www.henrymakow.com/mini-nukes_we ... _9-11.html

[Tomas]

.

The Other Ground Zero Mosque: Flight 93 Islamic Crescent Memorial

The Flight 93 Memorial mosque videos >> http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atla ... osque.html

[1456200423]

Meh...
Kurt Sonnenfeld

[Tomas]

.

Pentagon 9/11

New angle >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Vnu_yiUzls

[Tomas]

.

New 9/11 Video

Cruise Missile Strike Pentagon >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NeLcE0sht-M

[Tomas]

.

Proven 9/11 Nukes = US Government Involvement

By Dr. Ed Ward, MD

Any high school graduate should understand >> http://www.rense.com/general92/pr911.htm

[KRWoods]

Now, about this Pastor who intends to burn the Qur'an on September 11th (tomorrow).

All I can say is, what an idiot. The terrorist attacks were planned and carried out by extremists, and I'm sure many muslims are ashamed of what these extremists accomplished. To burn the Muslim holy book is an idiotic idea born from ignorant thinking. The Qur'an represents Muslims' beliefs and values, and to burn one would be to anger muslims everywhere, including the stable minded ones. You don't offend the masses to spite the few, it's illogical and an act of misguided emotions.

[Tomas]

.

-KRWoods-
Now, about this Pastor who intends to burn the Qur'an on September 11th (tomorrow).

-tomas-
Calm down, all will pass and Big Brother will still be in control..


-KR-
All I can say is, what an idiot.

-tomas-
Hey, the FBI visits you a couple times and who wouldn't shut-up.


-KR-
The terrorist attacks were planned and carried out by extremists, and I'm sure many muslims are ashamed of what these extremists accomplished.

-tomas-
Allah knows who really carried this out, and will be revealed in due time.


-KR-
To burn the Muslim holy book is an idiotic idea born from ignorant thinking.

-tomas-
Here in America, the new way is simply remove them from the library system. As a backup plan, just pass legislation saying that there are lead contaminants from anything published between 1776 and 1976 (any date will do) and presto chango - 1984 all over again!


-KW-
The Qur'an represents Muslims' beliefs and values, and to burn one would be to anger muslims everywhere, including the stable minded ones.

-tomas-
But it is permissible for Orthodox Jews to burn copies of the New Testament in the Occupied Territories. And for Muslims in the Gaza Strip to blow open church doors with RPGs and burn the Bibles, crosses and what have you :-)


-KW-
You don't offend the masses to spite the few, it's illogical and an act of misguided emotions.

-tomas-
Oh oh, those teeming masses are rearing their heads.