Borat
-
- Posts: 147
- Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2002 8:20 am
Borat
Did anyone see this movie? I think it is great, filled with truth.
- Dan Rowden
- Posts: 5739
- Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 8:03 pm
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 147
- Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2002 8:20 am
Re: Borat
Human psychology.Carl G wrote:Greg, I'm curious. What truth did you find the film filled with?Greg Shantz wrote: I think it is great, filled with truth.
- sue hindmarsh
- Posts: 1083
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2005 9:02 am
- Location: Sous Le Soleil
- sue hindmarsh
- Posts: 1083
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2005 9:02 am
- Location: Sous Le Soleil
Carl,
Rattling the cage of conventional thinking is useful as it can promote further consideration of concepts that most people just take for granted. As you point out, Borat’s targets are plainly superficial, “racist, sexist, and bathroom humourâ€, but it is the conventional view of these topics that creates the framework for much of people’s thinking. His irreverent take on these topics means that some people may find themselves considering the absurdity of their lives. They may see the inherent egotism in such things as love and marriage, nationalism and patriotism, polite and kind behaviour, along with the inherent racism and sexism in their behaviour towards race and gender.
Of course, this is a big ask – but this movie might be the trigger that awakens a viewer or two to begin considering the deeper consequences of their lives – and that would be refreshing!
-
Sue
Rattling the cage of conventional thinking is useful as it can promote further consideration of concepts that most people just take for granted. As you point out, Borat’s targets are plainly superficial, “racist, sexist, and bathroom humourâ€, but it is the conventional view of these topics that creates the framework for much of people’s thinking. His irreverent take on these topics means that some people may find themselves considering the absurdity of their lives. They may see the inherent egotism in such things as love and marriage, nationalism and patriotism, polite and kind behaviour, along with the inherent racism and sexism in their behaviour towards race and gender.
Of course, this is a big ask – but this movie might be the trigger that awakens a viewer or two to begin considering the deeper consequences of their lives – and that would be refreshing!
-
Sue
Portraying stupid does not inspire me to rise above my own stupidity. As if movies like "Dumb and Dumber," "Wayne's World" and "Borat" could be positive triggers. Better to show someone who sees, and acts upon his seeing, than someone who wallows in the lowest form of living.
Does bathroom humor ever inspire you, or are you just thinking /hoping abstractly?
Does bathroom humor ever inspire you, or are you just thinking /hoping abstractly?
Good Citizen Carl
you're just above it all, aren't you, carl?Carl G wrote:Portraying stupid does not inspire me to rise above my own stupidity. As if movies like "Dumb and Dumber," "Wayne's World" and "Borat" could be positive triggers. Better to show someone who sees, and acts upon his seeing, than someone who wallows in the lowest form of living.
Does bathroom humor ever inspire you, or are you just thinking /hoping abstractly?
- Dan Rowden
- Posts: 5739
- Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 8:03 pm
- Contact:
- David Quinn
- Posts: 5708
- Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 6:56 am
- Location: Australia
- Contact:
I havent seen it yet myself but at school alot of people are acually dissapointed with it. My impression is that they were expecting a full piss take overlooking its un-politically correct components being my assumption of the films core message.David Quinn wrote:Teenagers will love it, though.
Dan Rowden wrote:I'll wait till it comes out on DVD.....
I would imagine that at one time many philosophers would have deplored the idea of owning a DVD player.
;-)
- Dan Rowden
- Posts: 5739
- Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 8:03 pm
- Contact:
- sue hindmarsh
- Posts: 1083
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2005 9:02 am
- Location: Sous Le Soleil
-
- Posts: 411
- Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 7:11 pm
re
You're right. They were called the cynics. Perhaps the core of their beliefs was the notion that happiness came from within. Thus they looked at physical pleasures with disdain. Probably the most famous stoic was Diogenes (the "dog of Athens") who, when offered anything he might want by Alexander the Great, asked only that Alexander "step from between [him] and the sun". Although, given the age of both Alexander and Diogenes, it's likely that this story is merely a parable, and never actually happened. Nevertheless, I'm rather fond of it. :)I would imagine that at one time many philosophers would have deplored the idea of owning a DVD player.
- Dan Rowden
- Posts: 5739
- Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 8:03 pm
- Contact:
There are some nice Diogenes anecdotes here.
-
- Posts: 411
- Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 7:11 pm
re
Cool. Diogenes was an incredibly witty fella. Although, there was one occasion where Plato outwitted Diogenes. After stomping on Plato's carpet, Diogenes exclaimed "I trample upon the pride of Plato." Plato responded to this by saying, "Yes, Diogenes, with pride of another sort."There are some nice Diogenes anecdotes here.
- Dan Rowden
- Posts: 5739
- Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 8:03 pm
- Contact:
- David Quinn
- Posts: 5708
- Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 6:56 am
- Location: Australia
- Contact:
Sue wrote:
But it isn't very difficult to mock Christian fundamentalists. They are easy targets. It would have been more impressive if Borat tried to expose the sheer wackiness of the average scientist, the mainstream Christian, the "decent citizen", the moral woman, etc. These people are just as wacky as the fundamentalists are, but their wackiness is a lot harder for comedians to expose because it requires digging into the ego more deeply. If they were to start doing this they would cease being comedians and become philosophers instead, and their box-office appeal would rapidly diminish.
To tell you the truth, I am so bored and sickened by today's comedians and their limited routines. They only go so far in their mockery. There are thousands of thresholds which they never attempt to cross. They keep regurgitating the same old shallow humour over and over again. No wonder so many of them are depressed. They certainly make me depressed.
-
That was probably the point - no matter how idiotic and offensive Borat tries to be, he can't possibly hold a candle to Christian fundamentalists and their like, who are literally off their tree. And of course, he's right.There is one scene where Borat stumbles into a Christian fundamentalist meeting where the members are so very bizarre that Borat is totally outshone. (Having sex with your sister and drinking out of the toilet can’t compete with those wacko Christians.)
But it isn't very difficult to mock Christian fundamentalists. They are easy targets. It would have been more impressive if Borat tried to expose the sheer wackiness of the average scientist, the mainstream Christian, the "decent citizen", the moral woman, etc. These people are just as wacky as the fundamentalists are, but their wackiness is a lot harder for comedians to expose because it requires digging into the ego more deeply. If they were to start doing this they would cease being comedians and become philosophers instead, and their box-office appeal would rapidly diminish.
To tell you the truth, I am so bored and sickened by today's comedians and their limited routines. They only go so far in their mockery. There are thousands of thresholds which they never attempt to cross. They keep regurgitating the same old shallow humour over and over again. No wonder so many of them are depressed. They certainly make me depressed.
-
-
- Posts: 3771
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 11:35 am
Would you mind giving a couple of examples of what is wacky about a moral woman? And since you specifically mentioned "moral woman" rather than "moral person" and left off the wackiness of the moral man - could you highlight the difference that makes a moral woman wacky, but not a moral man?David Quinn wrote: It would have been more impressive if Borat tried to expose the sheer wackiness of ... the moral woman, etc.
David Quinn wrote:Sue wrote:
That was probably the point - no matter how idiotic and offensive Borat tries to be, he can't possibly hold a candle to Christian fundamentalists and their like, who are literally off their tree. And of course, he's right.There is one scene where Borat stumbles into a Christian fundamentalist meeting where the members are so very bizarre that Borat is totally outshone. (Having sex with your sister and drinking out of the toilet can’t compete with those wacko Christians.)
But it isn't very difficult to mock Christian fundamentalists. They are easy targets. It would have been more impressive if Borat tried to expose the sheer wackiness of the average scientist, the mainstream Christian, the "decent citizen", the moral woman, etc. These people are just as wacky as the fundamentalists are, but their wackiness is a lot harder for comedians to expose because it requires digging into the ego more deeply. If they were to start doing this they would cease being comedians and become philosophers instead, and their box-office appeal would rapidly diminish.
To tell you the truth, I am so bored and sickened by today's comedians and their limited routines. They only go so far in their mockery. There are thousands of thresholds which they never attempt to cross. They keep regurgitating the same old shallow humour over and over again. No wonder so many of them are depressed. They certainly make me depressed.
-
I've learned a lot about women. I think I've learned exactly how the fall of man occured in the Garden of Eden. Adam and Eve were in the Garden of Eden, and Adam said one day, "Wow, Eve, here we are, at one with nature, at one with God, we'll never age, we'll never die, and all our dreams come true the instant that we have them." And Eve said, "Yeah... it's just not enough is it?"
- Bill Hicks