Ontological Perception
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 6:23 pm
Conceptually speaking, from a purely materialistic standpoint, "objective reality" seems true enough, that we should not question it; but in truth, our objective realities are merely virtual reality creations of the mind and are actually subjective reflections, or shadows, of an ostensible *absolute world* beyond our senses. The only verification of this absolute reality is via consensus with other minds. Hence, the objective reality becomes an assumption, which relies on the confirmations of other observers. That means that in accordance with the scientific method, our objective reality, cannot be proved to be an independent absolute - only inferred to be an absolute, as possibly playing a particular role, in accordance with the statistical status quo.
We then come to the reductive realization that our ostensible - concensible objectification, assumes there exists a separation between object and subject, - "perceived and perceiver", but in truth, there isn't any separation. The only reality that we can ever know is the reality of perception, which is the reality of mind. Of course you may stub your toe, pronouncing to yourself that "it is satisfactorily refuted thus!"
But pain is also a perception of mind.
All objects of perception require a uniform logically consistent substrate OF perception, meaning that all objects of perception require a uniform[consciously aware] mental template of subjectification. Thus if the objective world stability is perceived as it truly is then the stability
of the subjective is the same as the stability of the objective. Ergo, the objective and subjective reality forms a duality, reflecting the two sides
of the same coin called awareness/consciousness. Raw awareness and consciousness forms the most basic aspect of the [objective/subjective] reality. Pure existence becomes pure thought/consciousness.
Thought becomes causality.
Causality creates time.
Conception creates the universe.
Consciousness is specifically localized and distributed globally.
God is that which nothing greater can be conceived. The greatest possible[aware/conscious] Being.
1 ) God is something that nothing greater can be conceived.
2) To exist in global reality is greater than to exist in the localized mind[reality] only.
3) Therefore, God exists.
We then come to the reductive realization that our ostensible - concensible objectification, assumes there exists a separation between object and subject, - "perceived and perceiver", but in truth, there isn't any separation. The only reality that we can ever know is the reality of perception, which is the reality of mind. Of course you may stub your toe, pronouncing to yourself that "it is satisfactorily refuted thus!"
But pain is also a perception of mind.
All objects of perception require a uniform logically consistent substrate OF perception, meaning that all objects of perception require a uniform[consciously aware] mental template of subjectification. Thus if the objective world stability is perceived as it truly is then the stability
of the subjective is the same as the stability of the objective. Ergo, the objective and subjective reality forms a duality, reflecting the two sides
of the same coin called awareness/consciousness. Raw awareness and consciousness forms the most basic aspect of the [objective/subjective] reality. Pure existence becomes pure thought/consciousness.
Thought becomes causality.
Causality creates time.
Conception creates the universe.
Consciousness is specifically localized and distributed globally.
God is that which nothing greater can be conceived. The greatest possible[aware/conscious] Being.
1 ) God is something that nothing greater can be conceived.
2) To exist in global reality is greater than to exist in the localized mind[reality] only.
3) Therefore, God exists.