No problem.I'm game to continue if you don't mind my adjustments, but if you're interested, it'd be better to work with the reiteration of my point, [...]:
- you can't relate existence to the absolute, precisely because it (existence) is relative. So if the absolute is said to be real, then existence must not be.
What would you say if I proposed this argument instead:Which would make my argument, in its most simple form:
1. The absolute is real
2. The Infinite is absolute
3. Things are finite
4. Things are not real
1. The Infinite is absolute
2. The absolute is enduring
3. Things are/existence is finite
4. Things are/existence is non-enduring