Re: Enlightenment
Posted: Wed May 28, 2014 1:50 am
Dennis, do you equate ignorance with fear of supply? And enlightenment/wisdom with finding supply?
Discussion of the nature of Ultimate Reality and the path to Enlightenment
http://www.theabsolute.net/phpBB/
And you think you're somehow beyond this just by shooting down your lizard brain like Weininger shot his heart?Dennis Mahar wrote:Yeah, well 'lizard brain' and its supply problems are a means to an end. To what end? Shooting bambi huh?It's this mental chase which you oppose inside your self more even than in others but unfortunately those who do not hunt become haunted!
equalsWhat's being "pointed" out to you are your own daggers and which "beast" you are stabbing in the dark of a blind spot.
What's being "pointed" out to you are your own daggers and which "beast" you are stabbing in the dark of a blind spot.
equalsAh yes...the split tongue kiss of death...
The two-pronged attack with a-double-edged sword!
Is that a double barrow shotgun in your pocket or....?
Ah yes...the split tongue kiss of death...
The two-pronged attack with a-double-edged sword!
Is that a double barrow shotgun in your pocket or....?
Space, time and mind is a matter of identity. To be reckoned by.Diebert van Rhijn wrote:Not at all, it's a matter of meaningless reproduction. But there's one original, a complex of origins perhaps, and with every copy and reading the understanding changes with its place in space, time and mind.
i.e., just as you cannot step into the same stream twice, the same identity cannot read the same thing twice.TheImmanent wrote:Space, time and mind is a matter of identity. To be reckoned by.Diebert van Rhijn wrote:Not at all, it's a matter of meaningless reproduction. But there's one original, a complex of origins perhaps, and with every copy and reading the understanding changes with its place in space, time and mind.
Make-belief.Cahoot wrote:i.e., just as you cannot step into the same stream twice, the same identity cannot read the same thing twice.TheImmanent wrote:Space, time and mind is a matter of identity. To be reckoned by.Diebert van Rhijn wrote:Not at all, it's a matter of meaningless reproduction. But there's one original, a complex of origins perhaps, and with every copy and reading the understanding changes with its place in space, time and mind.
Any identity influenced by space, time and mind is subject to change.
Indeed as it refutes everything you say, everything you think as well. Bliss.Dennis Mahar wrote:You refuted inherent existence. You said dependent origination.
No matter, it never is and can't be self-similar to anything else either. Anything that "is" can be replicated. But nothing really can. Then there's facsimile and passing likeness. Ego material.TheImmanent wrote:Space, time and mind is a matter of identity. To be reckoned by.Diebert van Rhijn wrote:Not at all, it's a matter of meaningless reproduction. But there's one original, a complex of origins perhaps, and with every copy and reading the understanding changes with its place in space, time and mind.
There are infinite definitions, defined in relation to each other. Change and replication is a generalization.Diebert van Rhijn wrote:No matter, it never is and can't be self-similar to anything else either. Anything that "is" can be replicated. But nothing really can. Then there's facsimile and passing likeness. Ego material.TheImmanent wrote:Space, time and mind is a matter of identity. To be reckoned by.Diebert van Rhijn wrote:Not at all, it's a matter of meaningless reproduction. But there's one original, a complex of origins perhaps, and with every copy and reading the understanding changes with its place in space, time and mind.
Go to the Complaints Dept.Of course you are "right" but the way you're wielding remains very aggressive, like some pesticide taking out herbs or like a shock collar silencing your own barking monkey. Do you never scrutinize yourself at times? Just for the hell of it? Improving the tune, tuning the tone, toning the dance?
You're saying no in a conversation where you think a piece of leggo fits appropriately based on the past.Why is bliss ultimate reality?
How do you know this?Kunga wrote:If you were Enlightened you'd know all the answers to everything.
Brook trickling. Wind blowing. Bird singing. Baby crying. Lion yawning. Body farting. Being a priori to facts and history. Pure sensory awareness.Dennis Mahar wrote:You're saying no in a conversation where you think a piece of leggo fits appropriately based on the past.Why is bliss ultimate reality?
something wasn't supplied according to a set of rules.
being is a priori to facticity/historicality.
Imagine spirit, mind, body as harmonic environment.
movingalways wrote:How do you know this?Kunga wrote:If you were Enlightened you'd know all the answers to everything.
You're saying no because bliss is against the rules.Why do you insert the mood (condition) of bliss?
One Truth to rule them all, One Truth to find them,Dennis Mahar wrote:There are many conventional 'truths', only one ultimate truth.
Generated as shibboleth, an inconvenience, inappropriate to mention is dependent arising.