http://voxday.blogspot.in/2014/01/the-f ... 5439348383
Oh wait, he just threatened to ban me. Goodbye cruel woooorldddd!!! My dying words:
Christian wrote:All right. Now you've established that you're an outright liar, Jupta. Any further comments on this thread will be deleted. These are all your comments in response to the accurate observation that science did not invent invent the alphabet, the printing press, or the typewriter.
1. "They weren't professional scientists in the modern sense, but they certainly needed a scientific approach to invent those things."
2. "You'd need a logical and methodical (probably in that order) approach to create a language, which is what a scientific approach is."
3. "I said a scientific approach is logical and methodical, not that any logical and methodical approach to anything whatsoever (like morality, or science itself) is "science"."
You are observably intellectually dishonest and while I have no problem with atheists posting here, I do not permit intellectually dishonest people of any creed to join the discourse here. If you wish to comment here again, I expect you to email me an apology to the readers of this blog as well as an admission that you lied and a promise not to do so again.
And this doesn't even get into the fact that your statements, in addition to being dishonest, are simply false. Languages are not developed out of either a scientific approach or a logical and methodical approach.I wrote:Well, I didn't expect this discussion to get far. But before you ban me, I should point this out: saying that a scientific approach is logical and methodical is not the same as saying that all logical and methodical approaches are practices of formal science according to the academic definition of the word "science."
To call this a lie would be either idiotic or deliberately obtuse. I'm guessing it is the latter in your case, which doesn't speak well for your own intellectual honesty. Plank, eye, brother, and all that.
BTW, LOL @ italicised part of his response