No reason to call that bliss as if it's some reward. We could just as well call wisdom and insight: suffering. And be more accurate even!Dennis wrote:Free from prejudice, like that. Accurate seeing
What's the purpose of discussing enlightenment/reality?
- Diebert van Rhijn
- Posts: 6469
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 4:43 pm
Re: What's the purpose of discussing enlightenment/reality?
-
- Posts: 2619
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:40 pm
Re: What's the purpose of discussing enlightenment/reality?
I and the Father are One.Diebert: But is it proper to introduce oneself as prime cause and will?Quote:
movingalways: At any given moment, I can cause myself to reason, I can will myself into reasoning, I can experience reason.
-
- Posts: 2619
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:40 pm
Re: What's the purpose of discussing enlightenment/reality?
Bliss is true nature? How can that be if bliss is not permanent?Dennis Mahar wrote:No excuses.
No justifiers.
Causing suffering is the suffering.
The Buddha taught emptiness/bliss.
True nature is felt.
-
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 9:03 pm
Re: What's the purpose of discussing enlightenment/reality?
Because of impermanence.Bliss is true nature? How can that be if bliss is not permanent?
nothin' to get.
where it's at.
The conditions.
in the midst of for the time being,
enmeshment;
embodied, embedded, enactive, affective, extended.
who could ask for anything more.
Wonderful.
An Event.