Kunga wrote:KJ: You didn't give legitimate proof
Kunga: Yes I did...I didn't make any of it up....it was not my opinion, but statements made by reliable sane people. LOL
Do you see why "other people say it is so" is an argumentum ad populam, the logical fallacy of trying to prove a statement or proposition based on the number of people who believe it? Or "the authorities say it is so" is an argumentum ad verecundiam, the logical fallacy of trying to prove a statement or proposition based on the fact some supposed expert supports it?
Also, you only wanted ONE woman to fit those CATAGORIES [Spiritual,Philosopher,Logician], you didn't initially specify as to quality.,,,you added those qualifiers after the initial task of finding the evidence....so you moved the goal posts ...
Your claim was that women are as competent as men, in spiritual matters. This means, you claim the existence of at least one female who matches the wisest of the wise, the greatest logician, and the philosophically soundest. It's a logical sequitur. There's no shifting of any goal posts. So, I challenged you to come up with at least one of each. You haven't.
KJ: claiming I was frothing at the mouth and a rabid bitch. What do you think that achieves? If nothing else, your responses are wonderfully clear demonstrations of the feminine mind
Kunga: Yes, and can you see how the belittling of my character as being "Not qualified to speak of spirituality, logic", etc. is the same demonstration of the bitchy feminine minded ?
It's not belittling. It's the truth. You are not qualified. I'd be begrandising you if I said otherwise.
KJ: You'reclearly not qualified to speak of spirituality, logic, or philosophy, judging by how poor your understanding of any of these things is.
Kunga: Ad Hominem
Sorry, but no. It's a logical conclusion that someone isn't qualified to speak of something based on their demonstration of ignorance. Try to do some thinking before you keep leaping into false conclusions.
KJ: All this proves is that you haven't a clue about spirituality, nor why logic is so important to it. But it doesn't stop you from using the Genius Forum as a place to socialise --- as if that couldn't prove any more clearly how superficial and small-minded you are.
Kunga: Ad Hominem
Again, wrong. My criticism of your abuse of the forum, splattering us all with your thoughtless emotionalism, comes
after my conclusion that you're unqualified to talk of spirituality, not before. It's just further evidence that you've nothing positive to offer the members of the forum, only as a negative stimulant in the opposite direction.
.