LiquidRainbow wrote:1.)Would you consider DNA a code/language?
You could consider atoms a language/code, or skin colour, or ground glass. Language is a basically about detecting patterns in things to which we bestow some meaning. Those patterns do not inherently exist in the things in which they are perceived.
2.)How much do you know about the universe? 5%(that's being generous)? - Any room that God possibly exists somewhere in there? Why do you not choose agnosticism over atheism then?
If God is defined as infinite, eternal, omniscient, omnipotent or something else along those lines, then it is logically impossible for him to exist.
3.)How did so many creatures end up using the golden spiral to form themselves.. chance? seriously.. remember a lot of these things are so called 'non-intelligent'? Why do so many 'non-intelligent' life forms use math to create themselves without being able to write? Do these trees, plants, seashells have a better understanding of math than most high schoolers by chance and innately?
Why do so many people snore when they sleep...chance?
4.)Can you please explain the past life experience studies that have been done on children? (If one of them was proved to be true to you would you consider this proof of a higher power?)
Even if past experiences in children occurred, and revealed the existence of some intelligent and powerful being, there is no reason to consider that being to be God, or even a god, as generally defined in religions. Such an intelligent or powerful being would be a finite thing, just the same as a rock, a pencil or a human being.
5.)Can you give me one example of something that doesn't exist creating something that does Exist?
No. But what is your point? If your underlying assumption here is that existence must have had a beginning, then I must disagree with that. It is impossible to conceive of a beginning without also simultaneously conceiving of a beginning of that beginning, and so on.
5A.) We live in a dimension of space-time, is it possible for the source to be part of an intrinsically timeless dimension, thus not having a beginning or end(so it doesn't have to create itself.. to refute hand over hand scenario)? If you think this is unlikely, why?
If the 'source' is without beginning or end, then it is not part of any dimension, and is unable to create anything.
6.) Do you consider Einstein, Faraday, Newton, Planck, Maxwell and Tesla to arrive at the conclusion that God existed without the use of logic?
Ad verecundiam fallacy here. Yes, if those people concluded that an infinite, eternal God existed then they certainly did so without using logic.
