Tell me, what happens if a cause decide to cause 'no effect at all'
Could be considered a cause?
This is what allows for things to form. It requires duality, wherein part of two opposite causes forms a central balance due to equalisation - in the meeting plane between the two forces, each force uses up much of power of the other, leaving minimal external force immediately surrounding the balanced portion. This results in a form of centralised staticness relative to that which surrounds the equalised spatial area. From this results "particalarisation" (just a word I made up) wherein the resulting staticness becomes a different form of cause - it is neither an expansionary force, nor a contracting force, but a third form of cause resulting from dualistic relativity. Unlike the two primary causes it is a cause created by being an effect (an outcome), the effect being
non-external causality.
Staticness forms the tri-fold pillar of fundamental reality - Expansion + Contraction and the combination of these two fundamental causes.
Space itself is the perfect form of the combination of the two forces. It is existence where the two forces are perfectly (thus permanently) in balance, it is where there is perfect equalisation. This prefect equalisation creates the effect of “of no external effect at all” and in being so, it thus is a causal entity of the nature of a
boundary.
It is this very staticness/boundedness that provides for the temporary nature of things. The surrounding spectrum of causal force ratios are prevented from
fully impacting upon the balanced portion. There is still some impact, everything in interconnected and balances in any defined spatial area are only ever temporary. Space is different however, as a whole it is permanent due to the logical necessity of the fact that there always must be a midpoint between two opposites. Unlike other things, Space has no event horizon.
Interestingly however the midpoint
in any defined spatial area is not stable – like things, space (when defined as a particular area) can and does shift as caused to by fluctuations in the ratios of expansionary and contracting force groupings, in the immediate vicinity and across the totality.
Expansion and contraction themselves are causes that result only as an outcome of being relative to each other. Expansion is simply the most recent time, while contraction is older time. As mentioned in an earlier post more recent time is always greater than older time by the fact that Now time is always a layer of existence painted ON what is already existing – thus it by default covers more area.
Non-dualism is not an invalid concept when speaking of The Totality – old time has the same existence as new time, except there is less of it. When I used the phrase “a midpoint between two opposites” above I do not mean truly opposite, but relatively opposite. There can be no true midpoint in something infinite, but there can be an infinity of relative midpoints. Time planes are where time of a certain age has exploded into fragments (due to the internal pressure situation discussed in my earlier post) and now exist as separated entities within more recent time. It is kind of the equivalent of a water balloon exploding and the water then forming a more two dimensional-like plane as it settles on a surface. Each explosion causes a new time plane – and these are relative to each other and can form a myriad of pseudo poles/opposites and midpoints. The atoms in our bodies we formed of different ages but they interconnect with each other and each plane of connection has a mid-point where existence is 50% atom A and 50% Atom B (don't forget that the radiation surrounding the atom is part of the whole of each atom), they are neither primarily one or the other
in that instant. Space is the same.
Three dimensional travel in space is movement in any direction, seemingly upon “nothingness”, but this viewpoint is totally illogical – nothingness cannot hold up anything for to hold up something means that what is doing the holding up contains causal power and nothingness cannot have causal power.
The reason Space/space allows three dimensional travel in a manner that results in time dilation, is because movement is a change in the moving thing’s time position relative to everything else. Relativity is Time relativity.
Our awareness is close to being existent in Now time (it misses out because recognition takes time – anything we are aware of happened some micro-seconds ago) but our bodies and everything we observe are an infinity of time of different ages. Travelling through space means travelling into, across and through Time planes (perfect 50/50 balances) and thereby affecting the surrounding ratios of new and old time which alters the relative location of the absolute centre of Space. This is movement. Apply this explanation to Zeno’s “paradoxes”.
Nothing I write on this topic is entirely logically consistent, there are always gaps – but if you were able to grok the gist of what I’m pointing to above you’d have a great head start on a legitimate TOE, compared to the crap most physicists throw up (as they fail to see the absolute interconnectedness of all things, and think their definitions are reality).
