Tomas wrote:Kelly Jones wrote:I'm a biological female.
By "the voice of woman", I meant the voice of the unconscious ego.
I wrote the above using "a man's voice" (a conscience).
Well, which is it? Are men convenient sugar daddies
or condescending oppressors?
.
Tomas-
What many women do not understand, at least younger women, is that using a man as the former has a tendency to transform him into the latter, if not for them, then for subsequent women in his life. Because if a man is not a convenient sugar daddy, then he becomes inconvenient.
I find that most women scoff at the notion they might be having detrimental effects on the men they let into their lives, as if such a thing were impossible, and could only be due to some weakness on the man's part instead of to their own shortcomings. ("If he's going to buy me all these gifts, why shouldn't I take them?" "I didn't break up his marriage - if his marriage was any good in the first place, he wouldn't have wanted to go to bed with me.")
I find that most men do understand that their actions can have lasting negative effects on the women in their lives, and they just do not care.
I'm not sure which one is worse, although they are equally guilty.