Sure, but that does mean the void is one thing alone that is infinite in all possible ways, as in that there is only one void thing that is completely non-bounded. The void is not God, it cannot create something from nothing, it is just the domain where things originate. Not being God, the void cannot create differentiated things without itself being differentiated. Nor can the void contain more than two differentiations, for with any more than two differentiations it automatically must be a thing. The massive array of different appearances we can observe can all be deconstructed down to dualistic causes - providing these dualistic causes are both capable of being bounded to a degree and non-bounded to a degree.Nevertheless, we can logically know and "fathom" that the hidden void cannot possibly be identified as a finite thing.
Even if the void has parts but is conceptualised as a whole, as a "void totality", it still seems to be bounded by the "finite totality". If the void was not bounded by the "finite totality", then I cannot see how any thing could exist, because no separation at all between the void and things could occur and everything would be the same as the void – yet, even though things themselves consist entirely “of the void†there is a form of separation. All the general properties things have are an indication that there is such separation. If anything exists, as does the set of all physical things, then this existence is causal, and it is dualistically causal in that its action flows both forwards (the causes flow on to affect something else) and backwards (existing existence changes the nature of the preceding cause by merging with it to become the causal form that flows forward). Backwards causal action is just another name for “boundariesâ€.
These last points are rather interesting – it may be an indication the word boundary is not a sufficiently appropriate term for what I’m talking about here. Nothing fully bounded can unify, yet without the existence of a boundary to block the causal action and cause it to change into a unified thing, neither will anything be caused to unify. All differentiation in the physical universe is an Effect, thus every point in the universe is an effect (even a point one micron away from another in empty space is different to the other). The unification of opposites creates the static nature of Effects, which will then result in the boundary of backwards causal action to non-unified forward causal action, while the non-unification contained in a thing, provides for the movement of these unified Effects (the forwards causal effect which will be bounded by existing unified causes).
