And yet you responded to my comment rather than just ignoring it. Your actions do not match your words. Furthermore, you seem to have incorrectly assumed that my entire post was entirely directed at you, and none of it for the benefit of Kunga - whose quote I re-included before my response.Carmel wrote:I'm not interested in a having a discussion with you.
Perhaps I should have addressed Kunga's patience and tolerance point previously on this point, and I do accept culpability for my late response to that point. I can see how my tardiness would contribute to your incorrect assumption.
These are a string of excellent examples of ad hominems. Here, Carmel starts of with an unrequested opinion of my philosophical progress with the obvious intent to hurt or insult. This was followed by a number of unsubstantiated statements presented as fact for the purpose of attacking me rather than anything in particular that I said.Carmel wrote:I don't think you are wise or enlightened by any stretch of the imagination. You also have poor reasoning skills and worst of all, you are meddlesome and gossipy.
Thank you Carmel for posting such great examples so quickly after my example of what would be very close to, but not quite, an ad hominem.
One can contrast these easily:
Elizabeth Isabelle wrote:Oh, and there's another snide remark tagged on the end. Prince appears to be addicted to those things.
As you can see, my comment directs a person to a specific example of what I was referring to. In contrast, Carmel's points are vague and are not linked to any kind of example.Carmel wrote:You also have poor reasoning skills and worst of all, you are meddlesome and gossipy.