the actual position is 'I am that that I am that''
a declaration.
meaning 'held'.
ground to stand in.
imputed,
what's the base of designation.
Will/conflict brouhaha is a straw man thrown in for distraction.
Those are conditional designators out of a point of view.
How can there be conflict out of what isn't broken.
You weren't always the position 'I am that that I am that'.
You read it in a book and took it on for suitability.
A nominal description.
You had to be prior to putting on the dress for dress up.
causes/conditions.
(I read this chapter on conflict/desire...thanks again Cahoot :) )
I can relate to that.. looking at my own lack of creativity, when there is no peace in my life & vice versa...
I think that what we know of Jiddu Krishnamurti are merely tracks of a great conduit of energy that transcends duality in the sense that it transcends time to exist in mind, that ports of awareness can access.
the actual position is 'I am that that I am that''
a declaration.
meaning 'held'.
ground to stand in.
imputed,
what's the base of designation.
I am That is sufficient to indicate one's absolute nature. Subject-object unification. A declaration of certainty as to position of being unmoving-mover. Knowing Self rather than believing something of self. All relative positions dropped.
Will/conflict brouhaha is a straw man thrown in for distraction.
Those are conditional designators out of a point of view.
How can there be conflict out of what isn't broken.
On the road to realizing one's absolute nature, will-as-if-in-conflict is the sword that cuts through the doubt cloud of relativity. Having said this, the absolute position is "I will" rather than "perhaps."
You weren't always the position 'I am that that I am that'.
You read it in a book and took it on for suitability.
A nominal description.
You had to be prior to putting on the dress for dress up.
causes/conditions.
I did it!
I did it!
geddit?
I was always the position of I am That but not consciously. Generations of inherited crap blocking the view of my single eye. It's being conscious of absoluteness that is game changer. I am it. I say it. I said it. I do it. I did it. I know it. I knew it. With the biggest game changer being the realization that not only is the object 'that' an it, but that the subject 'I' is also an It.
The perpetual knowing of the absolute, which must be as effortless as a heartbeat in order to be perpetual, makes the conditional separatist identity of I absolutely fluid, when not obscured by the relative, transitory, impermanent psychological afflictions everyone recognizes.
Considering that in the absolute sense all questions addressed to simulacra and their imagined qualities are actually addressed to singular undivided Self, then the answers to questions are liable to appear in an unanticipated form of the one Self. Examples abound: the benzene ring, the structure of DNA strands, not to mention answers born of synchronicity or serendipity.
When the questioner ceases to obscure answers with the limitations of arrogance or whatever, i.e., in the relative sense pay attention, the answer reveals in proportion to the sincerity of the question, unbound by former limitations.
Ask, and it shall be given, sometimes in ways unanticipated by limitations of the known.
The machinery to unobscure?
It’s rumored that Buddha only succeeded in offering just eighty-four thousand of them.
By which one can impute, a whole lota imputin goin on, like JK, a jnani.
absolute means 'set free, disengaged, detached, loosened up.
absolved of, acquitted.
an action.
to have it as a 'noun thingy' like a king set apart from his loyal subjects and they relative nonentities 'in respect to' doesn't work out.
that is a conceptual thingy and what is to be freed of.
the imputing mind generates environment, bodies, pleasures, sorrows, activities in order to.
always figuring out a new angle to come from.
setting up winning formulas.
oh well, back to the drawing board.
to talk of 'my absolute nature' and 'my relative nature' as thingies?
nouns like transcendent, immanent, absolute, relative look like characters in a saloon drinkin' whisky.
an argument about bragging rights in respect to pecking order
Yes Dennis, as you so often intimate, what we know of the phenomenal world beyond direct sensory experience is always a chain of inferences. Each link in the chain is a probability.
This is easily proven by entering an empty room and closing the door. Mind assigns varying probabilities to what lies beyond the door. Some of those probabilities are so high that they are erroneously called certainties. Some possibilities are definitely low probability. Attention and distraction influence the mind that assigns these probabilities, and as Heisenberg discovered, intent can influence phenomena in ways that also affects probabilities.
The chain of inference also applies to the world of direct sensory experience, though that world is so habitual that experiencing the world as a construct of probabilities is a more subtle affair.
when a tree is looked at summarily, it's characteristics, properties and functions look 'real' and it stands out as it's own thing.
Under a forensic analysis it isn't that way at all.
The conventional mode of apprehending the tree in it's own thing is valid and not crazy.
for instance, the eye sees a cup and the cup is picked up in the hand from where the cup is seen to be, it isn't a mirage like heat haze in the distance looks like water.
and yet the cup isn't its own thing.
The causes/conditions that contributed to it's appearance are invisible to the conventional mode.
The 'conventional mode of appearing function' is mistaken under analysis.
Where the tree appears to be in it's ownness there's actually clear space, nothing there at all.
WTF?
The tree in its owness looks like a trick.
The 'conventional mode of appearing function' or imputing mind looks like a tool to get things going aka belief.
The intent of that mind is to make it real come what may.
Accepting both conditions,
the thing's mode of appearing and the thing's actual mode of existing gets an access to being in command of the situation somewhat for dasein.
the other guys thingness and emptiness operating simultaneously.
What's the intent now?
Did Heisenborg provide a clue to deal with it?
What do you do?
Throw your hands up in the air in consternation?
Oh well, back to the drawing board.
What's the intent now?
Did Heisenborg provide a clue to deal with it?
What do you do?
Throw your hands up in the air in consternation?
Oh well, back to the drawing board.
That’s just conditioned intent.
Unconditioned intent is manifested in the elemental balancing forces that hold the tree, and everything else, in dynamic stillness.
All unconditioned movement is a movement to balance.
Dennis, subject-object union does not imply relativity. Nor is it a script. Nor is it a declaration. Subject-object union is consciousness aware of something. Not things in relation to other things, not subject in relation to object, but subject analyzing this thing.
Jesus speaks of the transcendence of male / female, not the annihilation thereof. The Absolute transcends duality, it does not negate it or reconcile it This is a very important distinction: the transcendence of dualism vs the nullification of dualism. Anyone who tells you that transcendence is nullification of good / evil, or male/female, or positive / negative, is a false prophet, a charlatan, or an ignoramus. The New Age movement appears to be primarily responsible for propagating this lie. No, to transcend is to rise above into a higher unity. The Absoute stands above all dualism, not because it nullifies or reconciles male and female, but because it is the higher unity that created all dualism. Male is still male, and female is still female. The good is still the enemy of evil. To destroy dualism is to destroy existence.
This is why Christ said, Love thy enemy, and not: Thy enemy is thy friend. The enemy is still the enemy. Love transcends, not annihilates dualism. It is also why he said: I came not to bring peace, but to bring a sword. He came to set good and evil against each other.
The conflation of transcendence with nullification is serpentine deception. The hermaphrodite is the demonic imposture of the Divine Androgyne; the bastard progeny of hydraheaded Mother Chaos. It is not the Heavenly Father, much less the Divine Androgyne. Whispers from the abyss can destroy the soul.