Already have. My ideas are a projection of 30 years study.Trevor Salyzyn wrote:Pincho,It is not a virtue to pretend an understanding. You are playing make-believe with something that has frustrated a generation of specialists. None of your blather has impressed me in any way. Maybe you should start on smaller problems that you can resolve, and work yourself up to the trickier things.Or, you just don't try to understand it.
Post Enlightenment...
- Pincho Paxton
- Posts: 1305
- Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 10:05 am
Re: Post Enlightenment...
- Pincho Paxton
- Posts: 1305
- Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 10:05 am
Re: Post Enlightenment...
Everything is a pair. Matter, and energy. However, your mental projection just changes the 0/1 state of a particle. So it would be still connected to the matter no matter where it was.Ignis Fatuus wrote:Pincho PaxtonWhat makes perfect sense?It's not fucked up. It all makes perfect sense to me.
If I'm physically at home, but mentally project myself to a different place, does this mean I'm in two places at once? ...Which one is real, how can you possibly know this to be without a doubt?
If this makes perfect sense, then it's wrong. It always is...
I keep using 0/1 to explain dual state, but really it should be thought of as -1/+1, and the zero state is when neither has been decided yet.
- Trevor Salyzyn
- Posts: 2420
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:52 pm
- Location: Canada
Re: Post Enlightenment...
Pincho,
Not designed to be true.
It sounds like something Gary Gygax came up with in his bathtub one morning, though.Already have. My ideas are a projection of 30 years study.
Not designed to be true.
- Pincho Paxton
- Posts: 1305
- Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 10:05 am
Re: Post Enlightenment...
Well it's a subject that is mostly invisible to our sensual environment, and therefore seems to be a form of magic. However, the tests cause results that we can perceive once we fit a lot of things together. We see the jigsaw after it was made, and we see a full picture, and we never realised that it was made from funny shaped pieces. I have managed to strip the jigsaw apart, but I still have some missing pieces. I am getting close to an even better understanding, I am working on the distance at the moment. Distanct effects without connection.Trevor Salyzyn wrote:Pincho,It sounds like something Gary Gygax came up with in his bathtub one morning, though.Already have. My ideas are a projection of 30 years study.
Not designed to be true.
Re: Post Enlightenment...
Precisely. That simple and honest sentence encapsulates all resistance to philosophical realization. And you are correct, of course. One's fundamental concept of self is drastically altered by the absence of delusion, to the point that from the perspective of that self-concept (ego), it looks and feels like total annihilation. The concept of a "true self" (one which "actually exists" in some independent or objective sense) is in fact the core delusion that supports all of the others, and it's always the last one to go.How do I rid myself of delusion (LOL)-->I think I'd disappear if I did this!
So yeah, the "you" you know now would dissapear. But the "other you," which is Nature itself, would not be fazed in the least. And since Nature is all there is and the "you" you know is just a dream, nothing whatsoever would actually happen outside your own mind. This is where the ability of language to transmit meaning breaks down due to the impossibility of conveying non-duality using dualistic concepts, so it would be pointless to try to point any further. Just go do it and find out for yourself.
I live in a tub.
Re: Post Enlightenment...
I usually don't encourage use of the Captain Crunch Secret Decoder ring "enlightenment" badge because of all the baggage associated with it and the ego-reactions it gets, but I do like this definition.1ntel: when all delusions have been destroyed, only truth remains. That is enlightenment.
And here's a helpful cheat-sheet:
Any sentence that starts with the following words is a delusion which must be dropped:
"Reality is..."
"Nature is..."
"God is..."
"I am..."
All of those statements (and others of their kind) are wrong if they include anything after the word "is." In their two-word form, such as "Reality is" with no further elaboration, they are tautologically correct but entirely superfluous.
Of course, even though such statements are necessarily false, they can sometimes be useful as pointers in communication - just as works of fiction often point to important realities. This is harmless as long as they are taken in that spirit rather than being believed in and of themselves. No inherently dualistic concept, idea, thought, or image is a true or complete representation of a non-dualistic (or trans-dualistic) reality. Only reality, directly percieved above and beyond all conceptualization, is a true representation of itself.
I live in a tub.