Dennis Mahar wrote:
the definition of spaciousness I'm referring to is relatively unattached to form,
So was I. Sadly for the world, and for this forum, most people’s minds are more than capable of holding much nonsense. This situation arises because they do not take their own lives seriously enough to care what goes in or what tumbles out of their minds. They just don’t care.
because form is causes/conditions,
it's nature is impermanent and lacks selfhood.
What caused you to come onto this forum and write posts such as you do?
that doesn't mean form doesn't exist.
it just means how it exists.
When you go to cross a street, do you look left and right to see if any cars are coming before you cross?
Kierkegard is a meaning maker.
there is no intrinsic meaning,
it seems Kierkegaard thinks there is as his story unfolds.
the nature of human being is meaning maker.
we can't go on assuming there's fixed condions which meaning making attempts to establish.
Saying that Kierkegaard is a “meaning maker” is like saying Einstein was a doodler! It is criminal of you to label the mind of such a man as glibly as you have. Kierkegaard’s deep love of truth is present in all he wrote. His words jump off the page they are so full of life.
Your scratchings, and those of your ilk that post on this forum, show how much you despise life, and despise truth by your constant evasion of everything. You go on and on saying nothing at all. You pretend that you are removed from humanity by rejecting it. But all you prove is that you are frightened by everything.
First place your feet on the ground and then write what you are.