Hexagon Universe?

[Pincho Paxton]

I'm an artist, and have to paint faces a lot. their faces have hardly any matches. The most obvious difference is the noses. One flat, the other protruding. Plastic surgery of that scale is usually easy to spot.

[Pincho Paxton]

Science takes another step towards my theory.....
BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Hints of 'time before Big Bang'

[Tomas]

Science takes another step towards my theory.....
BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Hints of 'time before Big Bang'

As that Professor Carroll says in the article "...no one gets confused about which is yesterday and which is tomorrow."

Pincho, there is no way to measure what happened before the Big Bang, this is what it is. I'd rather settle on what is rather than what was.

When we (each collectively) pass from this human body then you'll know what is to come. If this, maybe that, how about that, etc will have no bearance on whatever happened before the Big bang Baby took place (if it even happened).

[Pincho Paxton]

Science takes another step towards my theory.....
BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Hints of 'time before Big Bang'

As that Professor Carroll says in the article "...no one gets confused about which is yesterday and which is tomorrow."

Pincho, there is no way to measure what happened before the Big Bang, this is what it is. I'd rather settle on what is rather than what was.

When we (each collectively) pass from this human body then you'll know what is to come. If this, maybe that, how about that, etc will have no bearance on whatever happened before the Big bang Baby took place (if it even happened).

The Big Bang is a religion just like God. Neither are true. That is why the God argument continues, because it is up against another human brain tumour. One side of the brain V's the other. If the truth were available to compare God with than I doubt that God would stand a chance.

[mensa-maniac]

Pincho, you never cease to amaze me with your intelligence and knowledge. I have to ask you if you've ever tried to find the Golden Angle using fibonacci sequence? My older friend who is 66 has been working on this for many years and believes he has found the Golden Angle.

I find this article of yours in Hexagon Universe interesting enough to follow the thread, understanding will come by how much interest I show in reading it over again. Interest comes from interesting material.

Thanks for the educating experience

[Pincho Paxton]

Pincho, you never cease to amaze me with your intelligence and knowledge. I have to ask you if you've ever tried to find the Golden Angle using fibonacci sequence? My older friend who is 66 has been working on this for many years and believes he has found the Golden Angle.

I find this article of yours in Hexagon Universe interesting enough to follow the thread, understanding will come by how much interest I show in reading it over again. Interest comes from interesting material.

Thanks for the educating experience

Thanks, the Golden Angle... I was thinking about the natural lengths of human joints, how they are mathematically a percentage of one another. I didn't realise that this mathematical formula spread all through nature.

[1456200423]

Pincho, enjoy. ;-)

It's a Fractal Universe
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bE2EiI-UfsE

[1456200423]

Action Movie of Individual Atoms in Action
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EogdalfXF4c

Hexagonal Spirallohedra
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Js0evCum83o

Three years of X flakes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q2Zty3aSd2w

Dream
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFChFhSrRpc

[Pincho Paxton]

Been looking at the Fibonacci sequence, and I wonder if man has accidentally arranged the sequence in the order of value. we do tend to arrange thing that way we think looks nice. But I prefer...

2,1,1,3,5,8.... etc

This makes more sense. Working with many things.. it take two to create 1 is the main difference. The tree trunk is 2, and the branches are both 1. So I would rather swap them around. I just think that we have created a slightly nonsensical order to make the pattern look pretty.

[1456200423]

The tree trunk is 2, and the branches are both 1.

Why is a tree trunk 2?

[Pincho Paxton]

The tree trunk is 2, and the branches are both 1.

Why is a tree trunk 2?

Well the current pattern for a tree trunk is 1,1, which is really 2. Just going by general height, and thickness I would rather just call it 2. I would rather say that 2 people create 1 child, and then another 1. It sounds better than 1 person, and another 1 create 2 children. But mostly I prefer that the universe started with 2 particles, and then from those two created a new one. So I much prefer to rearrange the pattern.

There could be an equally nice pattern going backwards too. being as the branches are halving in size, you could have two combined mathematical equations evening each other out. All adding up to no gain.

1,1,2,3,5,8 Number
1,1,0,-1,-3,-6 Mass

these two parallel equations all add up to 2, and they allow for E=Mc2 I think. Although I don't like the zero in there, so it needs shuffling around a bit.

[Pincho Paxton]

Galaxy with Aether overlayed to show how I think that Gravity really works. The old theory currently used is that planets are pulled together in a spiral fashion. But I think that you would get saucer shaped planets if that really happened. So my model shows why planets are round, and not saucer shaped....

[TIMELOOP]

Expanding and contracting 3d hexagonal grid fractals in a Bose Einstein condensate state seen as a boson field of energy EMF carriers, where photons don't move but are points in space/time where only their information or observable EM frequency state is passed on. Now the BEC field is creating the quantum entanglement phenomena, where none frequency energy without space/distance or time interacts through the fractal inner structure....only when energy flows through matter it is turned into EMF you can see or detect,with the dimensional constants of observable space, as the EM waves are indeed representing moments in observable time. Or is that not what you are thinking?

[Tomas]

Or is that not what you are thinking?

Hey Loop. You may need to PM Pincho. He's been away for some time now, not much interest from the folks here at Genius - so some of us tend to 'fade away'. Ultimate reality, you dig?

[Pincho Paxton]

Hi!

So now it's 2012, and the Hexagon Universe that this thread opened with has been with me for a few years. I continued with my studies, and I created some computer simulations. Over the years I came to the conclusion that the hexagons were the result of Newton's Kissing Problem...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kissing_number_problem

...That 12 same size sphere can surround a single sphere. Spacetime is made from scalar particles. Through entropy the particles eventually scale to the same size. Once scaled to the same size the physics are that of Newtons Kissing Problem, but combined with negative mass holes as the centre particle. From any angle the energy will pass through these particles as a hexagon flow. You get a fractal with energy passing chaotically through the fractal. The chaos in the energy flow is due to the fact that a 13th ball area is available in Newton's Kissing Problem, but Newton decided that it was impossible to fit the 13th ball into the gaps. The gaps allow freedom of spin, and rotation around the central hole. The hole is the nucleus, the flow, and scalar influences, and pulses are time.

This is just a quickly typed update.

[ForbidenRea]

Y