that's the problem with you. You consider every point of view to be valid, not if it's True or not.brokenhead wrote:He has his point of view and it's valid. I just don't view the world the same way.
Search found 643 matches
- Thu Jan 31, 2008 10:49 am
- Forum: GENIUS FORUM
- Topic: Making peace with femininity
- Replies: 794
- Views: 92260
Re: Making peace with femininity
- Thu Jan 31, 2008 10:46 am
- Forum: GENIUS FORUM
- Topic: Making peace with femininity
- Replies: 794
- Views: 92260
Re: Making peace with femininity
actually no. I quoted her because her choice of words and tone fit perfectly the real thing.Elizabeth Isabelle wrote:Haha - he even has to quote a female to communicate his thoughts about how females can't think.Faust13 wrote: The feminine mind is like, in the words of Sue, a "swirling, half-formed, tangled thing."
- Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:48 am
- Forum: GENIUS FORUM
- Topic: Making peace with femininity
- Replies: 794
- Views: 92260
Re: Making peace with femininity
Here's another good example of feminine logican oxymoron of a word. This is a very interesting sentence. What does it mean? there was supposed to be a space there, don't tell me you didn't notice that. Feminine logic is an oxymoron because there's nothing logical about the feminine. The feminine mi...
- Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:42 am
- Forum: GENIUS FORUM
- Topic: Making peace with femininity
- Replies: 794
- Views: 92260
Re: Making peace with femininity
It's so plainly obvious that harboring contempt is counteproductive, that it's difficult to know how to respond. harbouring contempt isn't counterproductive, it's a test to see if someone actually cares about something or if someone just wants to be validated by them. You can respond with a reasone...
- Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:22 am
- Forum: GENIUS FORUM
- Topic: Making peace with femininity
- Replies: 794
- Views: 92260
Re: Making peace with femininity
But let's go with your definition that a misogynist is a man who hates women's feeble-mindedness. Now if you have contempt for a person's feeblemindedness, you have contempt for that person. Agreed? yes, what's your point? You use the term "quantitative." Where do you get the idea that wo...
- Sun Jan 27, 2008 4:21 pm
- Forum: Help Desk
- Topic: Unemployment: Best Indicator of Integrity
- Replies: 475
- Views: 36181
Re: Unemployment: Best Indicator of Integrity
a real disability is a physical one such as being paralyzed, or mentally retarded with an IQ of 50. Unidian is a phony disability, because there's a difference between not wanting to do something, and not being able to do it. Shahrazad, the problem with that is that anyone can willfully keep getting...
- Sun Jan 27, 2008 3:52 pm
- Forum: GENIUS FORUM
- Topic: Making peace with femininity
- Replies: 794
- Views: 92260
Re: Making peace with femininity
What is a 'misogynist' and why would they be one? Use a dictionary. There are many of them on the Web. And "they" can't be "one." The first is plural, the second singular. the dictionary provides a piss poor definition of misogyny. I consider misogyny to be not some vague and mi...
- Sun Jan 27, 2008 3:37 pm
- Forum: GENIUS FORUM
- Topic: logical proof of causality without empirical?
- Replies: 39
- Views: 7856
Re: logical proof of causality without empirical?
"Exist" and "thing" are relative terms. X exists relative to not-X. The concept of causality is implied by the notion of a thing and existence, since things are dependent on other things to exist. An "independent thing" is a contradiction, since it would have no parts ...
- Wed Jan 23, 2008 6:04 pm
- Forum: GENIUS FORUM
- Topic: logical proof of causality without empirical?
- Replies: 39
- Views: 7856
Re: logical proof of causality without empirical?
Now let's get back to the ORIGINAL dilemma of this thread. How does QRS prove that causality is not empirical and 'logical'??? Saying that nothing can exist on its own, is empirical, how is this 'logical'??
How does "nothing can exist on its own" relate to and prove causality?
How does "nothing can exist on its own" relate to and prove causality?
- Tue Jan 22, 2008 5:27 pm
- Forum: GENIUS FORUM
- Topic: Making peace with femininity
- Replies: 794
- Views: 92260
Re: Making peace with femininity
Could you be more full of shit? "Attacking the feminine" is what misogynists do. What is the 'feminine' to you? What is a 'misogynist' and why would they be one? It seems to me that you can't accept that women are much more disabled to be enlightened than men. Look around you, everywhere ...
- Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:54 pm
- Forum: Help Desk
- Topic: Leg hair debate
- Replies: 83
- Views: 20661
Re: Leg hair debate
Carl, here is what I foresee in the next few hundred years. Nanotechnology will eventually be able to create small bachelor size living complexes constructed out of some sort of metal-organic substance for less than $5000.00, and cars will get smaller, like the smart car, and cheaper, maybe around ...
- Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:44 pm
- Forum: Help Desk
- Topic: Leg hair debate
- Replies: 83
- Views: 20661
Re: Leg hair debate
but overall, women are more likely to cooperate to make everything better for everyone than what you are saying, or than how men tend to do. uhhh, no. Women are mostly herd animals, and this 'herding' is not cooperating to make things better. If men do not perceive the stakes as particularly direct...
- Tue Jan 15, 2008 3:34 pm
- Forum: GENIUS FORUM
- Topic: Making peace with femininity
- Replies: 794
- Views: 92260
Re: Making peace with femininity
Femininity is far different from the QRS WOMAN. She is actually not very feminine at all. That is like taking the worst traits common to males and calling that masculinity. Saying 'she is not feminine at all' warrants the definition of the usual femininity. Perhaps the worst traits common to men is...
- Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:46 pm
- Forum: GENIUS FORUM
- Topic: Kelly's Truth Paper
- Replies: 428
- Views: 155353
Re:
I was reading this and I need to take a Devil's Advocate position to kelly's post It is the instinct to find a mate to complete oneself, believing that perfection is created by coupling . do you think that all coupling is motivated to be complete? What about to satisfy lust? What about unattached me...
- Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:46 am
- Forum: GENIUS FORUM
- Topic: Society for ego validation.
- Replies: 103
- Views: 8869
Re: Society for ego validation.
Absolutely. Boundaries, causes. No boundaries, no causes. Isn't there a lack of boundaries BECAUSE there ARE causes? [quote]Also, not sure I've ever heard you actually address this directly, but surely you must have: do causes themselves lack inherent existence? [/quote] Of course. Causes are merel...
- Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:35 am
- Forum: GENIUS FORUM
- Topic: Society for ego validation.
- Replies: 103
- Views: 8869
Re: Society for ego validation.
The great truths of life aren't empirically-testable, but they do apply to everything within the empirical world and beyond out of logical necessity. what are these great truths of life? Where does a cause end and an effect begin? That's a good question. In a deeper sense, there is no beginning or ...
- Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:54 am
- Forum: GENIUS FORUM
- Topic: Overcoming the Ego
- Replies: 28
- Views: 2966
Re: Overcoming the Ego
which delusions exactly? What is this 'self-conflicting' identification?Diebert van Rhijn wrote:A collection of delusions that are kept alive about the self. A perspective on self - an interpretation of ego. A form of self-conflicting identification.sagerage wrote:What is the ego to a Buddhist?
- Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:53 am
- Forum: GENIUS FORUM
- Topic: Overcoming the Ego
- Replies: 28
- Views: 2966
Re: Overcoming the Ego
In other words, laughter always emanates out of attachment and is essentially a process of the ego overcoming oppression and experiencing an increase of power. It is always egotistical in nature. what "oppression" are you exactly talking about? What is the problem of laughter being egotis...
- Sat Jan 05, 2008 8:19 am
- Forum: Help Desk
- Topic: Quit Electing Lawyers...
- Replies: 32
- Views: 3964
Re: Quit Electing Lawyers...
If you legalize drugs police can't fuck you over.
Ron Paul's a physician, wants to abolish IRS, end war on drugs, legalize drugs, et al. Iowa is full of intellectual imbeciles.
Ron Paul's a physician, wants to abolish IRS, end war on drugs, legalize drugs, et al. Iowa is full of intellectual imbeciles.
Re: Cui Bono?
The narrative is formed through a lie. The lie is believed. The belief functions and operates, gains a following, as with *genuflections* Mr. Tex Mars . yawn, yeah Mr. Texe Mars' well documented conclusions that the leaders of the US have unquestioning, zealous support of the rogue state even if it...
Re: Cui Bono?
I think Faust needs to accept that the Protocols are a forgery, because it's pretty well established. However, one might reasonably suggest that this is of lesser significance than the possibility of the verity of its content. I don't have anything specific to say on that; I'm just making the point...
Re: Cui Bono?
How about the fact that complete passages from protocols were lifted nearly verbatim from another book which was published decades earlier?.. hah. How about the fact that you didn't read my links at all? Makow explicitly writes about this here http://www.savethemales.ca/000298.html According to Gra...
Re: Cui Bono?
wrong, it hasn't been made public yet stupid. That article was in 2006 and it still hasn't happened has it.Alex Jacob wrote:Nazi Archive Made Public
- Thu Nov 29, 2007 2:38 pm
- Forum: GENIUS FORUM
- Topic: logical proof of causality without empirical?
- Replies: 39
- Views: 7856
logical proof of causality without empirical?
I'm still confused about how causality is logically proven without relying on any empirical observations. It's said that causality is logically proven because something can't exist on its own, but isn't this essentially empirical?
Re: Cui Bono?
Aren't you happy to have a believer in Protocols back you up, Diebert ? You must be veritably jumping for joy. Things in the Protocol are happening in the world. The next question is asking who is doing it. There's still no evidence that it's a forgery, and Henry Makow proves that quite well, but o...