GENIUS FORUMS

Russell: Well you didn't say that. I will assume you understand then If your consciousness is limited by distance could you give us that distance and prove your statement? If your consciousness is limited by time could you tell us when consciousness ends and begins and prove your statement? If your ...

Beingof1: Your series of questions leads to that state of awareness but one must make the leap into the infinite. Gustav Bjornstrand: Well as you see I am none-too-favorable to this viewstructure. And that is how I see it: an imposing structure of view. And while I might be influenced toward leaps ...

It's all about knowledge of the Absolute. A=A is the starting place. From there we can gather that existence is merely that which is perceived, and that any further inferences about the perceived lies in the realm of empiricism, which introduces inherent uncertainties. Obviously, uncertainties and ...

Gustav Bjornstrand: That predication is possible (A=A), when examined, may hold surprising 'mysteries' if you'll permit the term. But I do not see why in this instance you place as much empphasis on it. What is one supposed to gather from it? The three laws of thought or A=A allows us to determine i...

Rod wrote:We have a pest on the thread. He brings to mind an epigram attributed to Winston Churchill:

"The trouble with being the right is the company one must keep."

Gustav, kindly don't feed or encourage this 'performer'.

Are you ready to put your big boy pants on?

Beingof1: I meant to point out that projection always occurs in this format and is one of the main dark-spots to Internet association. Additionally, I confess to not well understanding this particular thread: what it is asserting, and why it is asserting it. I appreciate that - honesty - what a fri...

Russell: You missed my point. That for me to say the infinite is infinite is to imply there are two infinities? Was that your point? Could you point to that which is not contained by consciousness so we can see the line of demarcation between what is consciousness and what is not? No, I cannot point...

Unfortunatley for us all, and yet I am not complaining necessarily, the medium itself tends to elicit projections from each participant. In order to have a conversation on metaphysics - a tough philosophical, mythological and mystical topic - requires many many different layers of pre-definition. I...

Beingof1, It was hard but finally you managed to realize that your initial claims were simply not true. At least we can agree now that you're capable of telling a lie or make some (honest) mistake and making things seem untrue? It's important to establish this first. But you seem still to convenien...

Beingof1 wrote: I did not deny I have researched this event and I posted a video. Diebert: You're a professional, habitual liar, Ken. Your claim was that you never mentioned 911 on this forum and challenged me to a search. OK Diebert, you really want to do this? Now I am a "habitual liar"?...

Russell: Well in my opinion, phrases like "infinite energy" and "infinite set" shouldn't even be stated. It creates a false impression; that there are multiple infinites (unless we're talking about mathematical concepts, rather than Ultimate Reality). There is only one Infinite. ...

To those I care about: This is a great example of why it is critical to be rigid and never compromise with self honesty. It leads to infinite regressive loops that need to constantly be compartmentalized and separate to keep up cognative dissonance as "logical." It leads to insanity. The r...

When oh when are we going to do some work in philosophy?

Russell I think you are creating a false dichotomy. You are proposing that there is an "infinite energy" that is separate from all things, which somehow still leaves room for all things. Things and energy are ultimately one, and all that there is is the Infinite. I already said that. If yo...

Gustav Bjornstrand This one is for you in the video exchanges of who has the mostest culture of mystical traditions. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9v3xjf1kGlg BTW, stop telling everyone we have a secret alliance to undermine the new mother hen. Mommy is not happy with us right now. Mommy thought I...

Gustav Bjornstrand: As I have attempted to describe, all of my experience has been mystical (non-rational, and coming through channels other than rational and studious processes), but I came to a point of realizing that mystic vision, if it does not translate into concrete activity, is incomplete. M...

Russell: 11.There is an infinite amount of energy propelling all things. There's no such thing as an "infinite amount" because it would be impossible to quantify. Point this out please. OK I will revamp 11. There is infinite energy propelling all things. Do you assert consciousness to be s...

Rod: I would say you do not understand mathematics. Hey, you introduced relativity and that is all about math. It is yes and no. Relativity at the empirical level is all maths. Relativity at a metaphysical level does not involve maths. You say it is I that does not understand but after rereading our...

Hi Being The issue is in your first line. I would say you do not understand mathematics. Hey, you introduced relativity and that is all about math. It is yes and no. Relativity at the empirical level is all maths. Relativity at a metaphysical level does not involve maths. Rod, Please excuse the bri...

Rod: I think we make a triangle of views. Being, you seem to both understand metaphysics and not understand. The quotes you made indicate you understand, but your question indicates that you do not. My impression is that you are a mathematician who wants to make a détente / rapport with metaphysics....

I honestly can't say I know what Rod is on about. To me it just looks like a bunch of concepts clumped together with nothing really profound being said. Maybe I'm not reading carefully enough. His laying out of conceptual thought in the objective results in philosophical bantering over which finite...

Hello Rod and once again, thank you for your lifes work. I can only cherry pick as this thing called life gets in the way. Absolutes have no subject. The avoidance of sentences [to make absolute statements in the first instance] by the employment of diagrams avoids creating a subject where there is ...

Diebert: You really don't understand that there are situations where a nail gun might be more fitting than a hammer or the reverse? Duh? Why do you think I asked the question? To be able to tell me that my answer is wrong? It will depend on context, and the questioner. My first answer was correct. ...

Diebert: But I did not claim you "mentioned" the word 911. That's how you now change what I wrote to fit your conception of it Diebert said: I remember you as someone into 9/11 conspiracies What are you missing here? I did not deny I have researched this event and I posted a video. You cha...

Diebert:

You really don't understand that there are situations where a nail gun might be more fitting than a hammer or the reverse?

Duh?

Why do you think I asked the question?