Search found 1305 matches
- Sun Mar 31, 2013 10:06 pm
- Forum: Worldly Matters
- Topic: The Universe was created by a Dummy
- Replies: 31
- Views: 27626
Re: The Universe was created by a Dummy
Just in case you are reading the thread from the end without reading the beginning... The sun is an octopus sucker's fractal physics. My theory is fractal based, and the fractal is not only scalar, but also alters the physics at the same time. It can be programmed into a computer to create the entir...
- Sun Mar 31, 2013 9:55 pm
- Forum: Worldly Matters
- Topic: The Universe was created by a Dummy
- Replies: 31
- Views: 27626
Re: The Universe was created by a Dummy
Posting the same crap has strengthened your resolve, and science resolve. I can program my crap into a computer, and it works. It proves itself, I don't need any outside proof. Download, and then run it, and press the space bar.... http://homepage.ntlworld.com/pinchopaxton/Snowflake.rar You see, the...
- Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:07 am
- Forum: Worldly Matters
- Topic: The Universe was created by a Dummy
- Replies: 31
- Views: 27626
Re: The Universe was created by a Dummy
Perhaps you could point us to some peer reviews of your various theories. I'm always 10 years ahead of science, they have no way to examine work so different to the standard model. I have changed the proof from maths to a computer simulation of the Universe. Scientists do not understand how my comp...
- Sun Mar 31, 2013 6:38 am
- Forum: Worldly Matters
- Topic: The Universe was created by a Dummy
- Replies: 31
- Views: 27626
Re: The Universe was created by a Dummy
The Gravity Tearing of Spacetime This is a very important post for those that can follow it. It describes the creation of everything. Spacetime is made from a scalar grain structure. All you have to do is imagine a lot of bubbles that obey particle stacking rules... they do not stick together in oth...
- Sun Mar 31, 2013 12:48 am
- Forum: GENIUS FORUM
- Topic: Man VS Machine
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1804
Re: Man VS Machine
Do you think that the forces of distance and time intertwine to make simultaneity betwixt here and now, and galaxies far far away, impossible? I just use time as an energy. For example an atom has a nucleus which is the middle of the atom. I imagine time entering that hole as a liquid, and compress...
- Sun Mar 31, 2013 12:22 am
- Forum: GENIUS FORUM
- Topic: I was wrong I am totally delusional!...
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4484
I was wrong I am totally delusional!...
...isn't the title of the thread! :) The title of the thread is... A forum isn't the place to change opinions I want you to watch this video, and imagine that Richard Feynman is talking directly to you... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3pYRn5j7oI What you might have noticed is the pleasure in his f...
- Sat Mar 30, 2013 8:06 pm
- Forum: GENIUS FORUM
- Topic: Man VS Machine
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1804
Re: Man VS Machine
Identifying differences in two materials is hard. I mean the difference between metal, and wood, and organic materials is thought to be down to molecules, and atoms. But I also include time in the mix. If time is an energy, then radioactive material is made from a lot of time squashed into an atom. ...
- Mon Mar 25, 2013 11:23 am
- Forum: GENIUS FORUM
- Topic: Scientists exhibit a form of mass hysteria
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1357
Scientists exhibit a form of mass hysteria
The standard model of science is a business. Billions of pounds are spent on space satellites, and telescopes, and colliders. The people involved spend their whole lives living the Big Bang, and following the rules of science. But they have created a form of mass hysteria similar to the Tourette's i...
- Sun Mar 24, 2013 9:23 am
- Forum: GENIUS FORUM
- Topic: the universe doesnt have to be infinite
- Replies: 197
- Views: 23518
Re: the universe doesnt have to be infinite
Your comment was based on I "admit the mind has to be physical then", what does that mean? Particles are only something seen of the mind, they don't create the mind. They create the mind. We can't yet see atoms, or electrons, they are too small to see properly even with the best equipment...
- Sun Mar 24, 2013 6:27 am
- Forum: GENIUS FORUM
- Topic: Enlightened One Seeks Translator
- Replies: 9
- Views: 5040
Re: Enlightened One Seeks Translator
First and foremost is that you are communicating through a personality that is dysfunctional. Your posts are like Alice In Wonderland. Nothing you say is real. That is my translation of you. You call yourself enlightened but you are just about burning a pilot light. You are fading away into a singu...
- Fri Mar 22, 2013 1:14 am
- Forum: GENIUS FORUM
- Topic: the universe doesnt have to be infinite
- Replies: 197
- Views: 23518
Re: the universe doesnt have to be infinite
I tried to shorten all of your quotes to a single line. Your mind is made from particles. If you have a stroke, and the particles get effected you can't think properly anymore.SeekerOfWisdom wrote:You quoted me but you were making the quote up and then called it a paradox.
- Thu Mar 21, 2013 12:07 am
- Forum: GENIUS FORUM
- Topic: the universe doesnt have to be infinite
- Replies: 197
- Views: 23518
Re: the universe doesnt have to be infinite
When you test for them that is also something only seen of the mind. But you admit that you have a mind. It sounds like you are arguing with yourself. "I have a mind, but it is seen by the mind, so it might not be real..." Which is a paradox. Then later you say that we do have a mind. It'...
- Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:55 pm
- Forum: GENIUS FORUM
- Topic: the universe doesnt have to be infinite
- Replies: 197
- Views: 23518
Re: the universe doesnt have to be infinite
Your comment was based on I "admit the mind has to be physical then", what does that mean? Particles are only something seen of the mind, they don't create the mind. They create the mind. We can't yet see atoms, or electrons, they are too small to see properly even with the best equipment...
- Tue Mar 19, 2013 9:53 pm
- Forum: GENIUS FORUM
- Topic: the universe doesnt have to be infinite
- Replies: 197
- Views: 23518
Re: the universe doesnt have to be infinite
What are you talking about, of course we have a mind, how else would we think and do all those other things that depend on consciousness? So the mind has to be physical then, and not a dream. So you admit that the Universe is physical, and you admit that particles must exist. So you admit that delu...
- Tue Mar 19, 2013 12:47 am
- Forum: GENIUS FORUM
- Topic: the universe doesnt have to be infinite
- Replies: 197
- Views: 23518
Re: the universe doesnt have to be infinite
Chikoka/Pincho How is "depends" not the correct word? Can there be a concept without a mind? Clearly not. Then, clearly, the concept depends on mind. When you think, that depends on mind. Unless you can explain how you can think without one. When you see matter, that depends on mind. Unle...
- Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:18 pm
- Forum: GENIUS FORUM
- Topic: the universe doesnt have to be infinite
- Replies: 197
- Views: 23518
Re: the universe doesnt have to be infinite
I will ask you guys to just pause the neverending dependancies to consider that only what i posit in this post is true and that it is not dependant. Being persuaded me with his reasoning that "is independant of mind" is meaningless but that same reasoning shows that its is a concept so is...
- Sun Mar 17, 2013 5:49 am
- Forum: GENIUS FORUM
- Topic: the universe doesnt have to be infinite
- Replies: 197
- Views: 23518
Re: the universe doesnt have to be infinite
We have a mind. is that entity existing in its own right independent of conceptual designation? no, because it is known by 'attributes'. it has those attributes and cannot be equated with them. nothing can be found that exists in its own nature independent of conceptual designation. The physicist l...
- Sun Mar 17, 2013 1:22 am
- Forum: GENIUS FORUM
- Topic: the universe doesnt have to be infinite
- Replies: 197
- Views: 23518
Re: the universe doesnt have to be infinite
The mind becomes enamored by the infinite amount of things it can behold and convinces itself there must be more things that can be and are. The stunning reality is - the entire drama of the universe, never once, leaves your consciousness. The mind tricks itself by being entangled with a single obj...
- Sat Mar 16, 2013 10:35 pm
- Forum: GENIUS FORUM
- Topic: the universe doesnt have to be infinite
- Replies: 197
- Views: 23518
Re: the universe doesnt have to be infinite
It takes physics to think, it is impossible to redirect the mind from the mind. It is impossible for the mind to be relative to the mind. Your just using words to redirect the outcome of a losing argument. Losing the argument creates your delusion to throw in a false claim. Your false claim however...
- Sat Mar 16, 2013 8:23 pm
- Forum: GENIUS FORUM
- Topic: the universe doesnt have to be infinite
- Replies: 197
- Views: 23518
Re: the universe doesnt have to be infinite
Mind creates mind = paradox = false. I said mind is a condition, produced by causes. It doesn't exist in and of itself. because it's causal in nature it can't exist ultimately. because it's conditional it's changeable, transformable, it's possibilities are delusion and enlightenment. it can realise...
- Sat Mar 16, 2013 9:36 am
- Forum: GENIUS FORUM
- Topic: the universe doesnt have to be infinite
- Replies: 197
- Views: 23518
Re: the universe doesnt have to be infinite
Yes, but you are using the word 'mind'. So you admit that the mind exists. therefore you accept particles exist. You are making the same mistake as SeekerOfWisdom. To accept that the mind exists is to accept physics. If you accept that physics exist then you accept that the electron can exist. The ...
- Sat Mar 16, 2013 12:04 am
- Forum: GENIUS FORUM
- Topic: the universe doesnt have to be infinite
- Replies: 197
- Views: 23518
Re: the universe doesnt have to be infinite
your theory depends on your mind. interdependent. a mind that conceives of an electron. the electron that is conceived by it does not exist independently of that mind, nor does that mind exist independently of the electron it conceives. The relationship between the two is not a sequential one. It's...
- Fri Mar 15, 2013 9:22 am
- Forum: GENIUS FORUM
- Topic: the universe doesnt have to be infinite
- Replies: 197
- Views: 23518
Re: the universe doesnt have to be infinite
Dennis Mahar wrote:'snowflake fractal' depends.
causes/conditions.
if it depends it exists conditionally.
What does that mean? Strange use of English.
- Fri Mar 15, 2013 6:49 am
- Forum: GENIUS FORUM
- Topic: the universe doesnt have to be infinite
- Replies: 197
- Views: 23518
Re: the universe doesnt have to be infinite
the theory depends on the instruments used for measure and the inferences made thereupon concerning phenomena. causes/conditions. dependent arising. there is no evidence phenomena is infinite in any sense of the word. phenomenal existence could shut down at 6 o'clock tonight, you can't guarantee th...
- Thu Mar 14, 2013 11:05 pm
- Forum: GENIUS FORUM
- Topic: the universe doesnt have to be infinite
- Replies: 197
- Views: 23518
Re: the universe doesnt have to be infinite
Here's why my theory says that the Universe is infinite, and made up from particles. This image is part of a scientific survey of all of the matter in space, and its location. I have put a hexagon grid over the image, and changed the colours. Now you should see that the Universe has a hidden hexagon...