GENIUS FORUMS

804 wrote:http://balancingeverything.com/ and the like. It makes my biological clock come to a screeching halt.

Yikes, I know that B&N. IF needs a mommy blogger registry.

Cory Duchesne wrote:Queerer than we can Suppose

When I get some free time I might share my thoughts on this one.

Bump.

Tomas wrote:.Moderators Can Now Read Your PMs

A script'sn't necessary. Anyone with access to the database can read PMs.

This [pdf] ran in the NYT on July 4th, 2008.

Brokenhead, Worldly Matters has definitely returned from vacation. Admins, perhaps you should unlock its house so it doesn't need to couchsurf at its neighbor, GENIUS FORUM?

brokenhead wrote:Isn't this a "Worldly Matters" kind of thread...?

Dan better call in backup before a riot breaks out.

Mikiel, feed the trolls and they'll shit all over your discussion. I doubt anyone wants to wade through this thread now. You might get some responses if you posted a distillation of your argument from this thread to your website.

A disturbing case study

Internet + email's another huge addiction but not as visible as phone addiction.

The time is ripe to rename this place to Flowy Forum.

samadhi wrote:Make all the utilitarian judgments you want, just don't moralize about them to others.

What if I judge moralizing to have utility?

mikiel, Internet 101: Don't feed the trolls.

And what is it with your mixing up grammatical number ("...allows the Christian [singular] to fulfill their [plural] emotional desire...") Where you home schooled or something? Many use "their" as a singular pronoun, rather than a gender pronoun or one of the other constructions...

New website, eh? Good luck.

What happened to TowardsProgress's reply?

If two things were perfectly identical then they would be in the same place at the same time, and in fact there would only be one thing. The Totality? No, if you see two identical things in the same place and time then you have double vision. If they're not in the same place at the same time, they'...

mikiel and elderwoodxxx, a match made in heaven.

A video actually on-topic: Royksopp - Remind Me

http://panagiotisemmanouil.com/philosophy.html

Lorem Ipsum: the Ultimate Truth.

I was kinda hinting at independent verification. I was suspicious when I scored high on an online IQ test, and my suspicions were confirmed when I got someone else to do the test and they scored off the charts as well. The fact that this institution doesn't even want to be identified makes me suspe...

You are avoiding the argument. Fancy dancing is not an argument. Do you believe fatness precludes enlightenment ot not? A straight answer would be just fine, if you can muster it up. That's rich coming from someone that denies he made an assertion after stating something four times. I already answe...

Bump. You still here, brad, or give up the argument. It's fine either way. What argument? I'd have to assert something to make an argument. Cynical quips can be said at least four times before turning into assertions. I've only questioned your cynical quip a few times, so we're not yet arguing. For...

mikiel wrote:Actually, brad, I don't have such a need. How important is it to you to verify that Buddha was not an enlightened fat man?

Just the burden of proof on your assertion.