GENIUS FORUMS

It makes them cyberbullies. You have got to be kidding, Trevor. For the last two years, Alex has been spitting in David's virtual lunchbox. You (plural) should go pick on someone (plural) your own size (plural). You mean you cannot see the irony of saying this (above) and then right away saying thi...

Alex and his "ilk" leave you and yours in the dust. A remark only very natural coming from someone who was so impressed with the "breadth" and "depth" of the channeled Urantia Book quite recently. At least Alex channels with the intent to demonstrate the problem with a...

That slant of yours is what I’m speaking about. Having a point of view takes the place of actually thinking a thing through. With a point of view, you’re free to be as contradictory as you please, for the point of view need have nothing to do with what is true and what is not. Its job is to facilit...

Sue Hindmarsh wrote:It’s that simple truth that Alex and his ilk cannot afford to take on board

Alex and his "ilk" leave you and yours in the dust. He jokes about his macaw, but you are always the one who shows the understanding and regurgitation of a parrot.

Sue Hindmarsh wrote:It’s “grasping” in the same way people believe in angles, fairies, gurus, unicorns, and godheads. It's cowardice.

I believe in angles. Because obtuse people like you always think they are right, and they give me acute dyspepsia.

Shahrazad wrote:Ah, you seem to be admitting that you can't always get through his kilometric ramblings.

Not at all, my dear. I just don't always start. But when I do, I am sucked in, almost compulsively so. Maybe it's a character flaw, what can I say?

Am not.

Broken, I wonder, Nick, do you actually read what he writes? I'd be surprised to find someone who does. Shah, I read a lot of what Alex writes. He's hilarious. This is all up for grabs, mind you. If you went back and culled his posts, you would have enough material to last you a lifetime as a stand...

prince wrote:Is too.

Is not.

[quote=""prince""]Actually he's both, and a lot more.[/quote]
Is not.

The problem with women today is that too many of them are getting tattoos.

Nick Treklis wrote:You're an arrogant fool, Alex.

He is neither. I wonder, Nick, do you actually read what he writes?

It is my personal belief that the magnitude of life, of phenomenal existence, of the manifestation of this matter and energy in which we also appear, is not reducible to simple logical predicates. One cannot interpret existence, or respond to existence, soley through a logical mindset. Mine, too, a...

Robert wrote:

Shahrazad wrote:I am a VHEMT supporter. The less humans there are, the better.

More humans, less people.

More humans, fewer people.

I second this. I'd also settle for Alex on the Reasoning Show, if only because I'm curious to hear the tone of voice he uses. Reasoning Show, nothing. I'd like to see Alex on the Letterman show. He could do a "stupid human trick" and Weisenheimer could do a "stupid pet trick." O...

As an extension to b: if you only want to quote a specific part of someone else's post in your response, when posting your reply first select the text that interests you, then click on the "quote" button. The selected text with the all the proper quote tags are then placed into your respo...

Oh, man, these guys are great . Interesting how there are almost only women in that picture. Yeah, they don't look like a group of breeders to me. Easy for them to say don't have kids, there's probably no overabundance of males breaking down their doors to get them pregnant. But the lesbian said ab...

I'm the kind of person who thinks that my kind of people aren't recorded in history. The real heroes for me are the people who didn't make it into the history books, the hundreds of thousands of individuals who put their families before their legacy or had more passion for truth than for fame. Peop...

I'm sorry, but can someone just ban Alex already? He's taken a forum about Genius and Enlightenment and twisted it into a repository for his daily ego-maniacal mental masturbation. His is a kind of madness that will not be cured, "there is no cure for willful ignorance." He is in polar op...

Deontology and consequentialism are both too limited to base decisions off of, and decisions are a stupid waste of time that make inaccurate metaphysical assumptions in the first place. Argument over? (This is the first and last time I'm posting drunk.) Really, Trev, the first time? Swear to God? I...

You like to quote Jesus from the scripture---the standard quotes---but (and I only mention this because it is interesting) you fail to allude to the hundreds of instances where Jesus of the Gospels speaks about demonstrating concern for the poor. I read somewhere that there are something like 200 d...

I claimed that an exclusively male vote would have caused fewer problems. Now, if you've got a problem with that claim, state why. We have been stating why. It is an opinion, and one which you make without any argument that is remotely convincing or factual. For the record, I admit that making thes...

I don't care about the women you know, and either way it's the same thing whether they want it [abortion] on demand, or just 'available'. You sound like you don't care about the women anybody knows. And no, it is not the same thing. "On demand" means "paid for." "Available&...

DQ wrote:It is through such irrationality that the ego thrives.

I paint what I see, child.

DQ wrote:But that's not what you want, of course. You want a finite thing (consciousness) to be infinite.

I will agree on the finiteness of your consciousness, Quinn.