GENIUS FORUMS

Look at the sexual organs of both men and women. Women absorb knowledge easier than men. They like to grab and shut things in. Men like to give it and are positive.

mensa-maniac wrote: What was that something?

An original thought.

Transcending is not an ism, it is the activity of quitting or leaving behind, a pattern of thinking. For example, when one quits smoking, one has left that pattern of thinking about smoking behind. Same with sex. When one quits thinking of sex, one has left that pattern of thinking behind. If one d...

jufa wrote: What is not comprehended with the floating back and forth of these entities is that the outer objective visions and inner subjective feelings are the source of one another's existence.

I don't understand this. what entities ?

movingalways wrote: ...or you can not accept this condition of memory, and transcend this memory you have put upon your being.

I cannot accept it being paranoïd, but i can neither transcend it, or are you identifying transcendentalism with acceptance ?

movingalways wrote:If you can feel the propensity for expression, then you have objectified a shape of a thought that awaits your aha of a revelation, have you not?

I have no memory of it.
I know i can lift a rope on the other hand in the other hand.

non-dual objectification just does not make any sense. One can feel the propensity for expression, but it goes no further than this if it has to have any meaning. The pure idea stays in the mind. If you want solid evidence, i cannot give the solid words of somebody else. I'm usually trying to think ...

For if identification with some subject were a continuous process, then man would be focused on his subconscious activity, which is exactly the opposite of a discrete process, which is not. I do not know what you are pointing to here, please explain. You aren't differentiating between a continuous ...

How do you define non-duality? How do you describe non-duality in detail? How do you argue for non-duality? What are the implications of non-duality, in general and for the way that you live/approach your life? non-duality is the oscillatory process of becoming one with objects through constant int...

pegasus wrote: jesus!! (was paranoid) How do you know this? Explain please! because he said: do not cast your pearls before swine or something like this and yet he is throwing his own pearls. This sounds paranoïd to me even if he claims to be simply a reflection. Non-dual objectification is paranoï...

Does persuasion and salesmanship count as lying? Where can you draw the line? If instead of a car salesman saying, "We got a new blue Cadillac in today", he said "We got a beautiful new blue Cadillac in today", did he turn that statement into a lie? lies are good for linear prog...

You sure do protesteth and preacheth a lot. When someone enters another's thought world, as you do mine, with retorts and curses, it is not because he is wise, but because he is unable to challenge what is being said with his logic or his spirit discernment or lack thereof. 2,000 years ago, you wou...

imagination precedes reality, if reality is interpreted as consensus. Imagination stands alone as in a stand alone complex; its ideas are not shared. Someone once said: the present era dreams the next one.

Since thought is a continuum of I am interpretation, it is not possible for man to stand still on one platform of I-dentification. Man is always being nudged or pricked of his conscience of consciousness to expand beyond this moment of I am interpretation unto the next moment of I am interpretation...