Search found 2336 matches

by SeekerOfWisdom
Sun May 29, 2016 11:59 pm
Forum: GENIUS FORUM
Topic: All you get without chocolate
Replies: 48
Views: 40505

Re: All you get without chocolate

is a sign of attachment. Attachment to what? Or instead answer this first if you like: Are you certain of who/what you are and could you tell me? What happens next if the piano dropped on you? (as I asked earlier) "Since there is no penance like patience, you must give anger no opportunity to ...
by SeekerOfWisdom
Sun May 29, 2016 11:51 pm
Forum: GENIUS FORUM
Topic: All you get without chocolate
Replies: 48
Views: 40505

Re: All you get without chocolate

Another: "Do your homework!"- Diebsby Legge's Translation "When we renounce learning we have no troubles." Susuki's Translation "Abandon learnedness, and you have no vexation." Goddard's Translation "Avoid learning if you would have no anxiety. " I like this p...
by SeekerOfWisdom
Sun May 29, 2016 10:24 pm
Forum: GENIUS FORUM
Topic: All you get without chocolate
Replies: 48
Views: 40505

Re: All you get without chocolate

True. But it's still a more creative, fertile world than one where you're the single one object, the "Self"! I do not live in a world where I am the single one object, the "Self"! Sorry :) The wise do not instruct. They teach by setting example Did you read that in the tao te ch...
by SeekerOfWisdom
Sun May 29, 2016 9:03 pm
Forum: Worldly Matters
Topic: The Fall of the West
Replies: 20
Views: 23722

Re: The Fall of the West

H8 to break it to you. But you're not going to die.

It's "the good news".

Notta thing gonna change for you when the beaper goes flat. (Well, nothing important)
by SeekerOfWisdom
Sun May 29, 2016 8:54 pm
Forum: GENIUS FORUM
Topic: The nature of consciousness
Replies: 259
Views: 159413

Re: The nature of consciousness

Dan Rowden wrote:
A=A is that which cannot be spoken or thought about. It is the primality of all. As soon as you think about it, you've lost it, and yet, paradoxically, when you understand this, you never lose it.

Hello Eckhart Tolle.
by SeekerOfWisdom
Sun May 29, 2016 8:51 pm
Forum: Worldly Matters
Topic: The Fall of the West
Replies: 20
Views: 23722

Re: The Fall of the West

Oh my god, it's alive!
by SeekerOfWisdom
Sun May 29, 2016 8:15 pm
Forum: GENIUS FORUM
Topic: All you get without chocolate
Replies: 48
Views: 40505

Re: All you get without chocolate

.
by SeekerOfWisdom
Sun May 29, 2016 6:55 pm
Forum: GENIUS FORUM
Topic: All you get without chocolate
Replies: 48
Views: 40505

Re: All you get without chocolate

.
by SeekerOfWisdom
Sun May 29, 2016 6:01 pm
Forum: GENIUS FORUM
Topic: All you get without chocolate
Replies: 48
Views: 40505

Re: All you get without chocolate

.
by SeekerOfWisdom
Sun May 29, 2016 5:55 pm
Forum: GENIUS FORUM
Topic: All you get without chocolate
Replies: 48
Views: 40505

Re: All you get without chocolate

..
by SeekerOfWisdom
Sun May 29, 2016 5:30 pm
Forum: GENIUS FORUM
Topic: All you get without chocolate
Replies: 48
Views: 40505

Re: All you get without chocolate

.
by SeekerOfWisdom
Sun May 29, 2016 4:46 pm
Forum: GENIUS FORUM
Topic: All you get without chocolate
Replies: 48
Views: 40505

Re: All you get without chocolate

.
by SeekerOfWisdom
Sat May 28, 2016 10:59 pm
Forum: GENIUS FORUM
Topic: All you get without chocolate
Replies: 48
Views: 40505

Re: All you get without chocolate

.
by SeekerOfWisdom
Sat May 28, 2016 9:45 pm
Forum: GENIUS FORUM
Topic: All you get without chocolate
Replies: 48
Views: 40505

Re: All you get without chocolate

.
by SeekerOfWisdom
Sat May 28, 2016 7:25 pm
Forum: GENIUS FORUM
Topic: All you get without chocolate
Replies: 48
Views: 40505

Re: All you get without chocolate

..
by SeekerOfWisdom
Sat May 28, 2016 3:20 pm
Forum: GENIUS FORUM
Topic: All you get without chocolate
Replies: 48
Views: 40505

Re: All you get without chocolate

..
by SeekerOfWisdom
Sat May 28, 2016 2:24 pm
Forum: GENIUS FORUM
Topic: All you get without chocolate
Replies: 48
Views: 40505

Re: All you get without chocolate

..
by SeekerOfWisdom
Sat May 28, 2016 1:55 am
Forum: GENIUS FORUM
Topic: All you get without chocolate
Replies: 48
Views: 40505

Re: All you get without chocolate

.
by SeekerOfWisdom
Sat May 28, 2016 1:04 am
Forum: GENIUS FORUM
Topic: All you get without chocolate
Replies: 48
Views: 40505

Re: All you get without chocolate

..
by SeekerOfWisdom
Sat May 28, 2016 12:57 am
Forum: GENIUS FORUM
Topic: All you get without chocolate
Replies: 48
Views: 40505

Re: All you get without chocolate

Moving, you're not asking very good questions in my view.
by SeekerOfWisdom
Sat May 28, 2016 12:06 am
Forum: GENIUS FORUM
Topic: All you get without chocolate
Replies: 48
Views: 40505

Re: All you get without chocolate

..
by SeekerOfWisdom
Fri May 27, 2016 10:17 pm
Forum: GENIUS FORUM
Topic: All you get without chocolate
Replies: 48
Views: 40505

Re: All you get without chocolate

No, I am not currently aware of your causality of killing ants.
by SeekerOfWisdom
Fri May 27, 2016 9:16 pm
Forum: GENIUS FORUM
Topic: All you get without chocolate
Replies: 48
Views: 40505

Re: All you get without chocolate

movingalways wrote:You won't present an argument or reason,
See, more "Quick to speak make believe". ^


You are telling me "I will not" do something, for me?

And to answer the 6 other things:

No,No,No(how would killing ants possibly achieve that outcome? are you crazy?),No,Yes,No.
by SeekerOfWisdom
Fri May 27, 2016 8:56 pm
Forum: GENIUS FORUM
Topic: All you get without chocolate
Replies: 48
Views: 40505

Re: All you get without chocolate

haha, tell me you really believe that? ^ (See what I'm talking about?) And you didn't actually ask me any questions. You said "present your argument against the truth of causality." I don't have an argument against the "truth of causality". Get it? Maybe just learn to word your q...
by SeekerOfWisdom
Fri May 27, 2016 7:17 pm
Forum: GENIUS FORUM
Topic: All you get without chocolate
Replies: 48
Views: 40505

Re: All you get without chocolate

Diebert van Rhijn wrote:Just present your argument against the truth of causality then.
Forgot my argument debate cards. What'd you expect?